Debates about changing the current paradigm of medical education and medical practice have become fairly common in recent years. Based on my experience as a research director of a prepaid group practice program and as chair of a medical school department of public health and preventive medicine, I contend that the traditional one-to-one physician-patient role obligations should be expanded to include a set of "one-to-n" physician-population obligations. The latter include at least three components: (1) a resource allocation component, (2) a component focusing on the epidemiologic nature of clinical practice, and (3) a component focusing on members of the population who are not regularly attended to within the normal context of physician care. Discussing these in turn, I argue for a population-based clinical practice model of medical education that preserves the Hippocratic tradition while better preparing physicians for the complex practice and insurance realities of the 21st century.
[1]
Abraham Flexner,et al.
MEDICAL EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA.
,
1910,
Science.
[2]
J. Howie.
Research in general practice: pursuit of knowledge or defence of wisdom?
,
1984,
British medical journal.
[3]
S. Nuland.
Doctors: The Biography of Medicine
,
1988
.
[4]
W. Donnelly.
Medical Language as Symptom: Doctor Talk in Teaching Hospitals
,
2015,
Perspectives in biology and medicine.
[5]
R. Johnson,et al.
Course and prognosis of sarcoidosis in a nonreferral setting. Analysis of 86 patients observed for 10 years.
,
1985,
The American journal of medicine.
[6]
G. L. Engel.
The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine
,
1977
.
[7]
A. Feinstein,et al.
An informal appraisal of the current status of 'medical sociology'.
,
1981,
JAMA.