Impact of Three-Dimensional Vision in Laparoscopic Training

BackgroundSimulators are being used to teach laparoscopic skills before residents get to the operating room. It is unknown whether the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision will facilitate laparoscopic training. Therefore, our objective was to compare the effectiveness of using 3D imaging over the traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging to teach laparoscopic simulator skills to novice individuals and assess whether 3D imaging ameliorates laparoscopic performance for surgeons who have already adapted to working within a 2D surgical environment.MethodsThis prospective study involved 36 surgical residents and students. Inexperienced participants included medical students and first- and second-year surgical residents (n = 25). Experienced participants included third- and fifth-year surgical residents (n = 11). Participants were tested on six laparoscopic skills using 2D or 3D imaging systems and then retested about 3 months later using the opposing imaging system. Evaluation of performance was based on the time elapsed to task completion and the errors committed during that time.ResultsThe experienced participants performed better than the inexperienced participants regardless of the imaging system. Inexperienced participants initially tested using 2D imaging required significantly more time and/or made more errors to complete five of the six laparoscopic tasks compared to those initially tested using 3D imaging (p < 0.05). After initial testing on 3D imaging, inexperienced participants retested using 2D imaging performed significantly better on five of six tasks compared to the scores of inexperienced participants initially tested on 2D imaging (p < 0.05). In contrast, the inexperienced participants’ retested on 3D after initial 2D imaging did not improve on any laparoscopic task compared to the scores of inexperienced participants initially tested on 3D imaging. Among the experienced participants, no significant difference in time or errors to task completion was observed under 2D imaging compared to 3D imaging during the first or second testing session.ConclusionsOur study indicates that 3D imaging offers significant advantages in the teaching of laparoscopic skills to inexperienced individuals.

[1]  A. Darzi,et al.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[3]  R. Clayman,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. , 1996, Journal of endourology.

[4]  J. Rosser,et al.  Surgeon-specific factors in the acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[5]  D. Bentrem,et al.  Hand dominance and performance in a laparoscopic skills curriculum , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[6]  M. Walz,et al.  A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[7]  Teodor P Grantcharov,et al.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[8]  M. Thomsen,et al.  An experimental comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic systems in a model. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  J. Windsor,et al.  The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees: testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills. , 2005, Surgical endoscopy.

[10]  A. Li,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  G. Andriole,et al.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System. , 2005, Reviews in urology.

[12]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1998, The Lancet.

[13]  D. Jones,et al.  The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[14]  G. Fried,et al.  Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  A. Darzi,et al.  The role of the Basic Surgical Skills course in the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skill , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[17]  A. Szold,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[18]  J. Reed Analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials in emergency medicine. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  Luke S. Chang,et al.  Assessment of a Three-Dimensional Operating System with Skill Tests in a Pelvic Trainer , 2000, Urologia Internationalis.

[20]  Timothy D Lee,et al.  Learning to Use Minimal Access Surgical Instruments and 2-Dimensional Remote Visual Feedback: How Difficult is the Task for Novices? , 2002, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[21]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Influence of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Imaging on Endoscopic Bowel Suturing , 2000, World Journal of Surgery.