Ethics and Big Data in health

Abstract With the EU General Data Protection Regulation entering into force in 2018, the stage is set for international debate on Big Data sharing in health. Considering the fact that health data (and especially genetic data) are considered “sensitive”, is there a way to structure the debate on the barriers, and risk-benefit ratio that moves away from the traditional pros and cons of potential privacy and discrimination risks? Potential discrimination has been addressed in legislation and the balancing of privacy rights against the potential benefits of data sharing in intensive science is leading to a more proportionate approach. We postulate that an important catalyst that will further shift this debate from its traditional contours would be to activate the “right to science” as enshrined in international law. Of note, the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health has developed a Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomics and Health-Related Data based on that human right. Similarly, recent guidelines from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, as well as from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics contain provisions that promote data sharing indicating that data intensive science may gradually come to be founded on a more communal ethos.

[1]  Jessica M. Wyndham,et al.  Data Rights and Responsibilities , 2015, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[2]  Nicolae V. Dură,et al.  International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights , 2000, Judicial Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

[3]  Steven N Goodman,et al.  An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. , 2013, The Hastings Center report.

[4]  R. Pyeritz,et al.  "Use it or lose it" as an alternative approach to protect genetic privacy in personalized medicine. , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[5]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research , 2011, Genome Medicine.

[6]  J. Dickinson,et al.  Precision Medicine: Drowning in Regulatory Soup? , 2016 .

[7]  Robert Cook-Deegan,et al.  Public variant databases: liability? , 2016, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  Eric Puybaret,et al.  Universal Declaration of Human Rights , 2006 .

[9]  Yann Joly,et al.  Comparative Approaches to Genetic Discrimination: Chasing Shadows? , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  R. Andorno Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. , 2009, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[11]  E. Meslin,et al.  Biobanking and public health: is a human rights approach the tie that binds? , 2011, Human Genetics.

[12]  Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects , 1993, Research on social work practice.

[13]  Rieke van der Graaf,et al.  International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research involving Humans , 2017 .

[14]  Kevin M Gowdie Privacy and security policy , 2011 .

[15]  Sumio Sugano,et al.  International code of conduct for genomic and health-related data sharing , 2014, The HUGO Journal.

[16]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Data Sharing and Privacy , 2017 .

[17]  Jorge L. Contreras,et al.  Bermuda's Legacy: Policy, Patents and the Design of the Genome Commons , 2010 .

[18]  Damian Smedley,et al.  Sustaining the Data and Bioresource Commons , 2010, Science.

[19]  Bartha Maria Knoppers,et al.  Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data , 2014, The HUGO Journal.

[20]  Magnus Rattray,et al.  Making sense of big data in health research: Towards an EU action plan , 2016, Genome Medicine.