Modifying Paradigms: Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation

In today's networked economy, ideas that challenge existing business models and paradigms are becoming more important. This study investigated how individual differences, groupware-based creativity techniques, and ideas from others influenced the type of ideas that individuals generated. While individual differences were important (in that some individuals were inherently more likely to generate ideas that followed the existing problem paradigm while others were more likely to generate paradigm-modifying ideas that attempted to change the problem paradigm), the exposure to paradigm-modifying ideas from others and the use of intuitive groupware-based creativity techniques rather than analytical groupware-based creativity techniques were found to increase the number of paradigm-modifying ideas produced.

[1]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[2]  M. Kirton Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[3]  George P. Huber,et al.  Response to Rao, et al: How to Deal with Cognitive Style , 1992 .

[4]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[5]  P. Costa,et al.  Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. , 1989, Journal of personality.

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  R. Saavedra,et al.  A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work‐groups , 1996 .

[8]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Response to Rao, et al.: more ado about cognitive style and DSS design , 1992 .

[9]  R. Payne,et al.  A Two-Dimensional Person-Environment Fit Analysis of the Performance, Effort and Satisfaction of Research Scientists , 1990 .

[10]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[11]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  The Dependent Variable in Research Into the Effects of Creativity Support Systems: Quality and Quantity of Ideas , 1998, MIS Q..

[12]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Management;: A contingency approach , 1974 .

[13]  Muayyad Jabri,et al.  The Development of Conceptually Independent Subscales in the Measurement of Modes of Problem Solving , 1991 .

[14]  C. Benaim The creative edge , 1988 .

[15]  J. Hackman,et al.  Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups , 1974 .

[16]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[17]  C. Gettys,et al.  Hypothesis plausibility and hypothesis generation , 1979 .

[18]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[19]  D. Robey Cognitive Style and DSS Design: A Comment on Huber's Paper , 1983 .

[20]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Stimulating ideas through creativity software , 1994 .

[21]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Creative Process: The Effects of Group Memory on Individual Idea Generation , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Creativity enhancement in problem solving: through software or process? , 1997 .

[23]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”☆ , 1992 .

[24]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Implications for problem‐solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literature , 1978 .

[25]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[26]  J. Couger Creative problem solving and opportunity finding , 1995 .

[27]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[29]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  Cognitive process as a basis for MIS and DSS design , 1987 .

[30]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[31]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[32]  B. Hennessey The Social Psychology of Creativity , 2003, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[33]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Can Software Influence Creativity? , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  A. Dennis,et al.  When a Group Is Not a Group , 1993 .

[35]  Brenda Massetti,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation , 1996, MIS Q..

[36]  J. Anderson,et al.  Automaticity and the ACT* theory. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  RobeyDaniel Cognitive Style and DSS Design , 1983 .

[38]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Hemispheric specialization, cognitive differences, and their implications for the design of decision support systems , 1992 .

[39]  P HuberGeorge Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs , 1983 .

[40]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[41]  Richard A. Cosier,et al.  Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance , 1990 .

[42]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  (Un)Structured Creativity in Information Systems Organizations , 1993, MIS Q..

[43]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[44]  A. Furnham The big five versus the big four: the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality , 1996 .

[45]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[46]  G. Huber Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[47]  M. Lorr An empirical evaluation of the MBTI typology , 1991 .

[48]  K. J. Evans,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-solving , 1990 .

[49]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[50]  C. Ford A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[51]  E. Bono Lateral thinking: Creativity Step by Step , 1970 .

[52]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[53]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas , 1981 .

[54]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .