Energizing organizational research: Advancing the energy field with group concepts and theories

While energy research has examined behaviors and decision-making in residential settings, it has largely failed to study these behaviors within the commercial sector. It has also neglected investigating these dimensions from a group level of analysis. Yet groups influence behaviors like energy consumption in addition to individuals, and forms of such influence – like collective outcome efficacy or team cohesion – requires research at the group level. This review offers an overview of the area and tools to start this work, first by examining how three levers of behavior change in energy studies – cognitions, social structures and technologies – have mainly been studied from an individual level of analysis. Second, it reviews energy research in commercial environments and finds that only a small number of studies since 1980 have been undertaken with a group level focus. Given this gap, a typology of key group constructs and levels of analysis was developed and measures were reviewed that fit into this typology. This led to the identification of types of questions that can be asked in each of the technological, structural and cognitive energy areas with a group focus.

[1]  Christopher Payne,et al.  The Commercial Energy Consumer: About Whom Are We Speaking? , 2006 .

[2]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  Building communities and social potential: Between and beyond organizations and individuals in commercial properties , 2014 .

[3]  James M. White The Normative Interpretation of Life Course Event Histories , 1998 .

[4]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[5]  W. Michele Simmons,et al.  Participation and Power , 2007 .

[6]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Employee Green Behavior , 2015 .

[7]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Conceptual Framework and Statistical Procedures for Delineating and Testing Multilevel Theories of Homology , 2005 .

[8]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  The ‘Four Dimensions of Behaviour’ framework: a tool for characterising behaviours to help design better interventions , 2014 .

[9]  Corinna Fischer Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[10]  C. Abraham,et al.  A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Between Messages and People , 2005, Communication Research.

[12]  R. Berk,et al.  Varieties of Normative Consensus , 1985 .

[13]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Making Sense of Intractable Multiparty Conflict: A Study of Framing in Four Environmental Disputes , 2008 .

[14]  Amir Goldberg Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined1 , 2011, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION , 2005 .

[16]  T. Scheff TOWARD A SOCIOLOGICAL MODEL OF CONSENSUS , 1967 .

[17]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[18]  J. Hackman Learning more by crossing levels: evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras , 2003 .

[19]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[20]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  From causes to conditions in group research , 2012 .

[21]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Energy‐Related Behaviors in Office Buildings: A Qualitative Study on Individual and Organisational Determinants , 2012 .

[22]  R. Ashmore,et al.  An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[24]  T. Newcomb An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[25]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective , 2009 .

[26]  L. Lutzenhiser Social and Behavioral Aspects of Energy use , 1993 .

[27]  J. Robertson,et al.  Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors , 2013 .

[28]  Scott Finlinson,et al.  How Organizations Can Drive Behavior-Based Energy Efficiency , 2011 .

[29]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  The Role-Set: Problems in Sociological Theory , 1957 .

[30]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Through the energy efficiency looking glass , 2014 .

[31]  P. S. Komor,et al.  Behavioral determinants of energy use in small commercial buildings; Implications for energy efficiency , 1988 .

[32]  W. Adger,et al.  Integrating social-ecological dynamics and resilience into energy systems research , 2014 .

[33]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Commonality and the Complexity of “We”: Social Attitudes and Social Change , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  Ingo Kastner,et al.  Implementing web-based interventions to promote energy efficient behavior at organizations – a multi-level challenge , 2014 .

[35]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use , 2007, Renewable Energy.

[36]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  The Group Dynamics Q-Sort in Organizational Research: A New Method for Studying Familiar Problems , 1999 .

[37]  E. Paluck,et al.  The salience of social referents: a field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  A. Carrico,et al.  Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education , 2011 .

[39]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  From “if only” to “social potential” in schemes to reduce building energy use , 2014 .

[40]  U. Franklin The real world of technology , 1993 .

[41]  R. Dawes,et al.  A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[42]  Katherine A. McComas,et al.  Using Comparative Feedback to Influence Workplace Energy Conservation , 2015 .

[43]  C. Midden,et al.  INNOVATING ‘DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION’ THEORY: INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THE INTENTION OF UTILITY COMPANIES TO ADOPT ENERGY CONSERVATION INTERVENTIONS , 2002 .

[44]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Interpersonal Approaches to Communication Research , 1973 .

[45]  Richard Jenkins,et al.  Categorization: Identity, Social Process and Epistemology , 2000 .

[46]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[47]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[48]  Nina Eliasoph,et al.  Culture in Interaction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  B. Lawrence,et al.  Identifying Organizational Faultlines With Latent Class Cluster Analysis , 2011 .

[50]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Team capability beliefs over time: Distinguishing between team potency, team outcome efficacy, and team process efficacy , 2010 .

[51]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Social Influence, Consumer Behavior, and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions , 2012 .

[52]  S. Svendsen,et al.  Residential and commercial buildings , 2012 .

[53]  Mel Schnake,et al.  Levels of measurement and analysis issues in organizational citizenship behaviour research , 2003 .

[54]  Rebecca Mancy,et al.  Which efficacy constructs for large-scale social dilemma problems? Individual and collective forms of efficacy and outcome expectancies in the context of climate change mitigation , 2011 .

[55]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[56]  Chia-jung Chou Hotels' environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: Interactions and outcomes , 2014 .

[57]  P. Steinglass The home observation assessment method (HOAM): real-time naturalistic observation of families in their homes. , 1979, Family process.

[58]  Richard Osbaldiston,et al.  Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science , 2012 .

[59]  D. Chan Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[60]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[61]  G. Lakoff Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment , 2010 .

[62]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[63]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Peak electricity demand and social practice theories: Reframing the role of change agents in the energy sector , 2012 .

[64]  A. Meade,et al.  Using Indices of Group Agreement in Multilevel Construct Validation , 2007 .

[65]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[66]  Michael T. Braun,et al.  Advancing Multilevel Research Design , 2013 .

[67]  Paul Parker,et al.  Residential energy efficiency programs, retrofit choices and greenhouse gas emissions savings: a decade of energy efficiency improvements in Waterloo Region, Canada , 2011 .

[68]  Arnold Vedlitz,et al.  Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming , 2007 .

[69]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[70]  Dancker D.L. Daamen,et al.  Improving Environmental Behavior in Companies , 2001 .

[71]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours , 2010 .

[72]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions , 2008 .

[73]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[74]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Changing energy-related behavior: An Intervention Mapping approach , 2011 .

[75]  M. S. Poole Generalization in Process Theories of Communication , 2007 .

[76]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Heider vs Simmel: Emergent Features in Dynamic Structures , 2006, SNA@ICML.

[77]  Chelsea Schelly,et al.  Reducing Energy Consumption and Creating a Conservation Culture in Organizations: A Case Study of One Public School District , 2011 .

[78]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior , 2007 .

[79]  M. Savitz,et al.  Rethinking energy innovation and social science , 2014 .

[80]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  Group Behavior and Performance , 2010 .

[81]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus , 1979 .

[82]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[83]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[84]  Dennis J. Devine A Review and Integration of Classification Systems Relevant to Teams in Organizations , 2002 .

[85]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  Organizational Culture: Beyond Struggles for Intellectual Dominance , 2004 .

[86]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[87]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[88]  Barbara Wejnert Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[89]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[90]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines , 2005 .

[91]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[92]  B. Schneider,et al.  Organizational climate and culture. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[93]  Formative Coorientation Research: A Tool to Assist with Environmental Decision Making , 2008 .

[94]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[95]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Economic Sociology and the Social Problem of Energy Inefficiency , 2007 .

[96]  B. Sovacool What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[97]  Kajsa Ellegård,et al.  Linköping University Post Print Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for developing effective policy , 2011 .

[98]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[99]  C. Midden,et al.  Communication Network Influences on Information Diffusion and Persuasion , 1991 .

[100]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  A Review of Determinants of and Interventions for Proenvironmental Behaviors in Organizations , 2012 .

[101]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A cultural model of household energy consumption , 1992 .

[102]  J. Bonito The Analysis of Participation in Small Groups , 2002 .

[103]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Time Scales and Organizational Theory , 1999 .

[104]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[105]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[106]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct , 2010 .

[107]  D. Meadows Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development , 2021, The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities.

[108]  W. Boyce,et al.  The family routines inventory: development and validation. , 1983, Social science & medicine.

[109]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[110]  Derek G. Ross Common Topics and Commonplaces of Environmental Rhetoric , 2013 .

[111]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  The Study of Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[112]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[113]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Environmentally sustainable household consumption: from aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action , 2002 .

[114]  Bryan D. Edwards,et al.  A Longitudinal Examination of the Comparative Criterion-Related Validity of Additive and Referent-Shift Consensus Operationalizations of Team Efficacy , 2007 .

[115]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[116]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Multiple Models to Inform Climate Change Policy: A Pragmatic Response to the ‘Beyond the ABC’ Debate , 2011 .

[117]  P. Shah,et al.  Who Are Employees' Social Referents? Using a Network Perspective to Determine Referent Others , 1998 .

[118]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  New thinking on the agentive relationship between end-use technologies and energy-using practices , 2008 .

[119]  Y. Fried,et al.  Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research* , 2001 .

[120]  I. Janis Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[121]  B. Brohmann,et al.  Connecting research to practice to improve energy demand-side management (DSM) , 2011 .

[122]  R. Shwom Strengthening Sociological Perspectives on Organizations and the Environment , 2009 .

[123]  Tanzeem Choudhury,et al.  Passive and In-Situ assessment of mental and physical well-being using mobile sensors , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[124]  C. Schermuly,et al.  The Discussion Coding System (DCS)—A New Instrument for Analyzing Communication Processes , 2012 .

[125]  P. Stern,et al.  Decision making for the environment : social and behavioral science research priorities , 2005 .

[126]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[127]  C. Bonjean,et al.  Sociological measurement : an inventory of scales and indices , 1969 .

[128]  Robyn Thomas,et al.  Managing Organizational Change: Negotiating Meaning and Power-Resistance Relations , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[129]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Navigating Environmental Attitudes , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[130]  Gary Blau,et al.  Enacting Ecological Sustainability in the MNC: A Test of an Adapted Value-Belief-Norm Framework , 2005 .

[131]  Roy Suddaby,et al.  Traditions as Institutionalized Practice: Implications for De-Institutionalization , 2007 .

[132]  P. Stenner,et al.  Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation , 2005 .

[133]  B. Biddle RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ROLE THEORY , 1986 .

[134]  Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al.  Public Praise vs. Private Pay: Effects of Rewards on Energy Conservation in the Workplace , 2013 .

[135]  G. Seijts,et al.  The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[136]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[137]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[138]  Louise Reid,et al.  Theorizing the meso level: the household as a crucible of pro-environmental behaviour , 2010 .

[139]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Behavioral Norms and Expectations , 1988 .

[140]  T. Webler,et al.  Social Narratives Surrounding Dolphins: Q Method Study , 2006 .