Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Anjo Anjewierden,et al. Detecting knowledge flows in weblogs , 2005 .
[2] S. Herring,et al. Women and Children Last: The Discursive Construction of Weblogs , 2004 .
[3] G. W. Milligan,et al. An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms , 1980 .
[4] Barbara M Koehler,et al. Scholarly communications program: force for change , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.
[5] A. Rubin,et al. Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .
[6] Paul E. Green,et al. Numerical Taxonomy in Marketing Analysis: A Review Article , 1968 .
[7] Steve Cayzer,et al. Semantic blogging and decentralized knowledge management , 2004, CACM.
[8] Erinn E Aspinall,et al. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Policy on Enhancing Public Access: tracking institutional contribution rates. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[9] Joann M. Wleklinski,et al. Studying google scholar: Wall to wall coverage? , 2005 .
[10] J. D. Johnson. Cancer-Related Information Seeking , 1997 .
[11] Julie Hillan. Physician use of patient-centered weblogs and online journals. , 2003, Clinical medicine & research.
[12] Eugene Barsky,et al. A look at Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scirus: comparisons and recommendations , 2005 .
[13] G. A. Mishne,et al. Expiriments with mood classification in blog posts , 2005, SIGIR 2005.
[14] Frederick J. Friend,et al. Google Scholar: potentially good for users of academic information , 2006 .
[15] R. Steinbrook. Searching for the right search--reaching the medical literature. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[16] Susan Gardner,et al. Gaga over Google? Scholar in the Social Sciences , 2005 .
[17] Jim Giles,et al. Science in the web age: Start your engines , 2005, Nature.
[18] R. Greg,et al. Notess. Scholarly Web Searching : Google Scholar and Scirus , 2005 .
[19] Michael D. Cooper,et al. Using clustering techniques to detect usage patterns in a Web-based information system , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[20] Douglas Kellner,et al. New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging , 2004, New Media Soc..
[21] Jim Henderson,et al. Google Scholar: A source for clinicians? , 2005, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[22] Kamran Abbasi,et al. Simplicity and complexity in health care: what medicine can learn from Google and iPod. , 2005, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[23] Dean Giustini,et al. How Google is changing medicine , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[24] P. Jacsó. As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .
[25] Laura M. Felter,et al. Google scholar, scirus, and the scholarly search revolution , 2005 .
[26] Sherrie S. Bergman. The scholarly communication movement: highlights and recent developments , 2006 .
[27] Jeffrey M Burns,et al. Exploring new ways of publishing: a library-faculty partnership. , 2003, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[28] John McKechnie,et al. Modelling information seeking behaviour of AEC professionals on online technical information resources , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..
[29] Jana Bradley,et al. Modeling public health interventions for improved access to the gray literature. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[30] Michelle Gumbrecht,et al. Blogs as “Protected Space” , 2004 .
[31] Marilyn Domas White,et al. Questioning Behavior on a Consumer Health Electronic List , 2000, The Library Quarterly.
[32] G. Mishne. Experiments with Mood Classification in , 2005 .
[33] R. Mojena,et al. Hierarchical Grouping Methods and Stopping Rules: An Evaluation , 1977, Comput. J..
[34] Sarah Barbara Watstein,et al. Google Scholar™ and libraries: point/counterpoint , 2005 .
[35] Kristin Yiotis,et al. The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications , 2005 .
[36] Richard K Johnson. Will Research Sharing Keep Pace with the Internet? , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.