A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making

A field experiment was conducted to analyze the process and contents of group discussions. Groups solved a case study either orally or through an asynchronous computer-mediated communication system. Findings show that asynchronous groups had broader discussions and submitted more complete reports than their face-to-face counterparts. However, there was no difference in the ability to transfer information from the discussion to the report; under both conditions, about 15% of the issues mentioned in the discussion were omitted from the final report. In terms of coordination, face-to-face teams covered the case study questions sequentially, while asynchronous groups were more focused on solving their general disagreements.

[1]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Impacts of Asynchronous Learning Networks on Individual and Group Problem Solving: A Field Experiment , 1999 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Distributed group support systems: Social dynamics and design dilemmas , 1991 .

[4]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome , 1992, CSCW '92.

[6]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An assessment of group support systems research: results , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[7]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Improving student learning of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions , 1978 .

[10]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[11]  Michael T. Vanecek,et al.  Computer conferencing and task-oriented decisions: Implications for group decision support , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Karol I. Pelc,et al.  The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks , 1996 .

[13]  R. Rice.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation , 1987 .

[14]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed group support: a preliminary analysis of the effects of the use of voting tools and sequential procedures , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  A descriptive investigation of the possible communication‐based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making , 1983 .

[18]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich.  Guidelines for using case scenarios to teach computer ethics , 1998, CSOC.

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[20]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Task and technology interaction (TTI): a theory of technological support for group tasks , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[22]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Issues and Concepts in Research on Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1989 .

[23]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[24]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed Group Support Systems , 1993, MIS Q..