Perceptual structure of the desired functionality of internet-based health information systems

With the emergence of the Internet, new health information systems are being designed and implemented that focus on coordination between providers, patients, payors and other constituents. While the importance of end user input in identifying the desired functionality of systems has long been recognized, very little work focuses on how users perceive the desired functionalities of these new systems to group together, and the implications of these groupings for the organization of functionalities into program modules and associated user interfaces. In this paper, we advance the construct, user based perceptual structure of desired functionality, in the context of these new coordination-intensive health information systems. Perceptual structure depicts how users perceive different desired system functions to group together. A conceptual framework is advanced which links perceptual structure to two broad categories of components, external coordination and internal coordination, which are related to prospective beliefs about system value. The framework is tested empirically via two field studies conducted by a hospital chain focusing on two major user groups, physicians and office administrators. The setting involves a proposed Internet-based health information system that links various constituencies in the service delivery chain. The empirically generated perceptual structure is found to be largely supportive of its conceptual counterpart. Implications for the design and development of this new class of systems, and public policy implications of such new systems are presented.

[1]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Involvement in Information System Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical Test , 1982 .

[2]  N. Melone A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[3]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[4]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Review: Computer-based Guideline Implementation Systems: A Systematic Review of Functionality and Effectiveness , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  H. Kaiser An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[6]  Treister Nw Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: the field of dreams. , 1998 .

[7]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[8]  Alok Gupta,et al.  User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: an empirical exploration , 2004 .

[9]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[10]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[12]  M Hagland,et al.  Power to the patient. , 1996, Hospitals & health networks.

[13]  Kevin J Leonard,et al.  The Role of Patients in Designing Health Information Systems: The Case of Applying Simulation Techniques to Design an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) Interface , 2004, Health care management science.

[14]  William R. King,et al.  Note-Participative Design of Strategic Decision Support Systems: An Empirical Assessment , 1981 .

[15]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. , 2005, Health affairs.

[16]  Charles A. Gallagher Perceptions of the Value of a Management Information System , 1974 .

[17]  William A. Knaus,et al.  Implementation Brief: A User-centered Model for Web Site Design: Needs Assessment, User Interface Design, and Rapid Prototyping , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[19]  A. Sartore Implementing a management information system : the relationship of participation, knowledge, performance and satisfaction in an academic environment , 1976 .

[20]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Customer-developer links in software development , 1995, CACM.

[21]  James M. Walker,et al.  Electronic medical records and health care transformation. , 2005, Health affairs.

[22]  Jane M. Orient,et al.  Health Care Policy , 2004 .

[23]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[24]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[25]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[26]  Y A Ozcan,et al.  Towards a science of the management of health care , 1998, Health care management science.

[27]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[28]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Consensus Systems Design: An Evaluation of this Approach , 1979 .

[29]  Alok Gupta,et al.  GIST: A Model for Design and Management of Content and Interactivity of Customer-Centric Web Sites , 2004, MIS Q..

[30]  Víctor M. González,et al.  "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres , 2004, CHI.

[31]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  The Process and Product of System Design , 1978 .

[32]  GoesPaulo,et al.  User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design , 2004 .

[33]  A. H. Schainblatt,et al.  The Researcher and The Manager: A Dialectic of Implementation , 1965 .

[34]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  Computers and coordination in manufacturing , 1992 .

[35]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .