Changes in contrast sensitivity induced by defocus and their possible relations to emmetropization in the chicken.

PURPOSE To test whether the level of contrast adaptation (CA) relates to refractive development in the chicken. (CA refers to a spatial frequency-selective increase of suprathreshold contrast sensitivity after exposure to low-contrast patterns). METHODS CA was determined in individual chicks by comparing their optomotor gain in response to drifting low-contrast stripe patterns before and after treatment with spectacle lenses. The amount of CA was compared with the loss of contrast predicted from defocus at the tested spatial frequency. The reversion of CA and recovery from deprivation myopia were studied while the retinal image features were controlled by forcing the animals to watch spatially filtered digital video clips. RESULTS CA was induced by wearing positive and negative lenses for 1.5 hours, both without and with cycloplegia, but was less pronounced in the case of positive lenses when accommodation was intact. The amount of CA at a tested spatial frequency was predicted from the loss of contrast calculated from the modulation transfer function for a defocused optical system. Watching low-pass-filtered video clips induced deprivation myopia and inhibited recovery from it. It also prevented the reversal of CA that was previously induced by deprivation. Both recovery from deprivation myopia and recovery from CA occurred with sharp video clips, although less so than with normal visual exposure. CONCLUSIONS CA changes with retinal image sharpness and occurs even when accommodation is intact. Because CA correlates with myopia induced by frosted occluders, negative lenses, and low-pass-filtered video clips, and its reversal correlates with recovery from myopia, it is possible that shifts in CA may represent a signal related to refractive error development.

[1]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens , 1988, Vision Research.

[2]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity. , 1977, Vision research.

[3]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  How good is the match between the plane of the text and the plane of focus during reading? 1 , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Interactions among spatial frequency and orientation channels adapted concurrently , 1988, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Millodot,et al.  Retinoscopy and Eye Size , 1970, Science.

[7]  T. Collett,et al.  Lower-field myopia and astigmatism in amphibians and chickens. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of intravitreal pirenzepine on deprivation myopia and lens-induced refractive errors in chickens. , 1995, Experimental eye research.

[9]  J Turkel,et al.  Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. , 1978, Science.

[10]  R. Masland,et al.  Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  M Millodot,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REFRACTIVE ERROR ON THE ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSE GRADIENT * , 1986, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  K. Schmid,et al.  The sensitivity of the chick eye to refractive defocus. , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxy dopamine treatment. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Long-term changes in retinal contrast sensitivity in chicks from frosted occluders and drugs: relations to myopia? , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Constant light affects retinal dopamine levels and blocks deprivation myopia but not lens-induced refractive errors in chickens , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Chapter 6 Retinal control of eye growth and refraction , 1993 .

[17]  W N Charman,et al.  Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[19]  F. A. Young.  THE EFFECT OF RESTRICTED VISUAL SPACE ON THE REFRACTIVE ERROR OF THE YOUNG MONKEY EYE. , 1963, Investigative ophthalmology.

[20]  K. D. Valois.  Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity , 1977, Vision Research.

[21]  E. Irving,et al.  Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[22]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Pattern electroretinogram threshold does not show contrast adaptation. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  James R Tresilian,et al.  Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.