Determining the research priorities for patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis

Background The importance of engaging key stakeholders, and patients in particular, in determining research priorities has been recognized. We sought to identify the top 10 research priorities for patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD), their caregivers, and the clinicians and policy-makers involved in their care. Methods We used the four-step James Lind Alliance process to establish the top 10 research priorities. A national survey of patients with non-dialysis CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), their caregivers, and the clinicians and policy-makers involved in their care was conducted to identify research uncertainties. A Steering Group of patients, caregivers, clinicians and researchers combined and reduced these uncertainties to 30 through a series of iterations. Finally, a workshop with participants from across Canada (12 patients, 6 caregivers, 3 physicians, 2 nurses, 1 pharmacist and 1 policy-maker) was held to determine the top 10 research priorities, using a nominal group technique. Results Overall, 439 individuals responded to the survey and identified 1811 uncertainties, from which the steering group determined the top 30 uncertainties to be considered at the workshop. The top 10 research uncertainties prioritized at the workshop included questions about treatments to prevent progression of kidney disease (including diet) and to treat symptoms of CKD, provider- and patient-targeted strategies for managing CKD, the impact of lifestyle on disease progression, harmful effects of medications on disease progression, optimal strategies for treatment of cardiovascular disease in CKD and for early identification of kidney disease, and strategies for equitable access to care for patients with CKD. Conclusions We identified the top 10 research priorities for patients with CKD that can be used to guide researchers, as well as inform funders of health-care research.

[1]  I. Chalmers,et al.  Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch , 2015, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[2]  I. Chalmers,et al.  Erratum to: Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch , 2015, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[3]  B. Hemmelgarn,et al.  Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review. , 2015, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[4]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Assessing the extent to which current clinical research is consistent with patient priorities: a scoping review using a case study in patients on or nearing dialysis , 2015, Canadian journal of kidney health and disease.

[5]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Setting research priorities for patients on or nearing dialysis. , 2014, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[6]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[7]  R. Grol,et al.  Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial , 2014, Implementation Science.

[8]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set , 2014, The Lancet.

[9]  Ray Moynihan,et al.  Chronic kidney disease controversy: how expanding definitions are unnecessarily labelling many people as diseased , 2013, BMJ.

[10]  A. Webster,et al.  Characteristics of dialysis important to patients and family caregivers: a mixed methods approach. , 2011, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[11]  S. Obaro,et al.  Hydroxycarbamide use in young children with sickle-cell anaemia , 2011, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Liberati Need to realign patient-oriented and commercial and academic research , 2011, The Lancet.

[13]  C. McCulloch,et al.  NIH Disease Funding Levels and Burden of Disease , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  J. Scadding,et al.  The James Lind Alliance: tackling research mismatches , 2010, The Lancet.

[15]  P Snelling,et al.  The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Bryan R Luce,et al.  Rethinking Randomized Clinical Trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Need for Transformational Change , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  S. Chadban,et al.  Patients' priorities for health research: focus group study of patients with chronic kidney disease. , 2008, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[18]  B. Psaty,et al.  Generalizability of the results of randomized trials. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  B. Psaty,et al.  Cardiovascular disease risk status in elderly persons with renal insufficiency. , 2002, Kidney international.

[20]  D Elbourne,et al.  Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  A. Levin,et al.  Cardiac risk factors and the use of cardioprotective medications in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. , 2001, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[22]  Paul Dieppe,et al.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer , 2000, The Lancet.