When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples.

Diversity in biological communities frequently is compared using species accumulation curves, plotting observed species richness versus sample size. When species accumulation curves intersect, the ranking of communities by observed species richness depends on sample size, creating inconsistency in comparisons of diversity. We show that species accumulation curves for two communities are expected to intersect when the community with lower actual species richness has higher Simpson diversity (probability that two random individuals belong to different species). This may often occur when comparing communities that differ in habitat heterogeneity or disturbance, as we illustrate using data from neotropical butterflies. In contrast to observed species richness, estimated Simpson diversity always produces a consistent expected ranking among communities across sample sizes, with the statistical accuracy to confidently rank communities using small samples. Simpson diversity should therefore be particularly useful in rapid assessments to prioritize areas for conservation.

[1]  F. W. Preston Noncanonical Distributions of Commonness and Rarity , 1980 .

[2]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[3]  R. Lande,et al.  Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruit‐feeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest , 1997 .

[4]  R. Lande Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities , 1996 .

[5]  A. Chao,et al.  Estimating the Number of Classes via Sample Coverage , 1992 .

[6]  E. H. Simpson Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[7]  H. L. Sanders,et al.  Marine Benthic Diversity: A Comparative Study , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Yosiaki Itǒ,et al.  Effects of undergrowth removal on the species diversity of insects in natural forests of Okinawa Hontô , 1997 .

[9]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Fitting species-accumulation functions and assessing regional land use impacts on avian diversity , 1996 .

[10]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[12]  R. A. Kempton,et al.  Log-Series and Log-Normal Parameters as Diversity Discriminants for the Lepidoptera , 1974 .

[13]  F. W. Preston The Commonness, And Rarity, of Species , 1948 .

[14]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice , 1996 .

[15]  I. Good THE POPULATION FREQUENCIES OF SPECIES AND THE ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PARAMETERS , 1953 .

[16]  S. Engen,et al.  Stochastic abundance models. , 1978 .

[17]  S. Hurlbert The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[18]  J. Bunge,et al.  Estimating the Number of Species: A Review , 1993 .

[19]  R. A. Kempton,et al.  The Structure of Species Abundance and Measurement of Diversity , 1979 .

[20]  K Hutcheson,et al.  A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  S. Hubbell,et al.  SPECIES-AREA AND SPECIES-INDIVIDUAL RELATIONSHIPS FOR TROPICAL TREES : A COMPARISON OF THREE 50-HA PLOTS , 1996 .

[22]  Ian F. Spellerberg,et al.  Monitoring Ecological Change: Index , 1991 .

[23]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  Patterns in the Balance of Nature , 1966 .

[24]  THE STRUCTURE OF DIATOM COMMUNITIES UNDER VARYING ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS , 1963, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.