Effects of growth rate, cell size, motion, and elemental stoichiometry on nutrient transport kinetics

Nutrient acquisition is a critical determinant for the competitive advantage for auto- and osmohetero- trophs alike. Nutrient limited growth is commonly described on a whole cell basis through reference to a maximum growth rate (Gmax) and a half-saturation constant (KG). This empirical application of a Michaelis-Menten like description ignores the multiple underlying feedbacks between physiology contributing to growth, cell size, elemental stoichiometry and cell motion. Here we explore these relationships with reference to the kinetics of the nutrient transporter protein, the transporter rate density at the cell surface (TRD; potential transport rate per unit plasma-membrane area), and diffusion gradients. While the half saturation value for the limiting nutrient increases rapidly with cell size, significant mitigation is afforded by cell motion (swimming or sedimentation), and by decreasing the cellular carbon density. There is thus potential for high vacuolation and high sedimentation rates in diatoms to significantly decrease KG and increase species competitive advantage. Our results also suggest that Gmax for larger non-diatom protists may be constrained by rates of nutrient transport. For a given carbon density, cell size and TRD, the value of Gmax/KG remains constant. This implies that species or strains with a lower Gmax might coincidentally have a competitive advantage under nutrient limited conditions as they also express lower values of KG. The ability of cells to modulate the TRD according to their nutritional status, and hence change the instantaneous maximum transport rate, has a very marked effect upon transport and growth kinetics. Analyses and dynamic models that do not consider such modulation will inevitably fail to properly reflect competitive advantage in nutrient acquisition. This has important implications for the accurate representation and predictive capabilities of model applications, in particular in a changing environment.

[1]  André W. Visser,et al.  Plankton motility patterns and encounter rates , 2006, Oecologia.

[2]  Susanne Menden-Deuer,et al.  Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton , 2000 .

[3]  Jason G. Bragg,et al.  Allometry and stoichiometry of unicellular, colonial and multicellular phytoplankton. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[4]  P. Harrison,et al.  Sinking rate response to depletion of nitrate, phosphate and silicate in four marine diatoms , 1982 .

[5]  K. Flynn.  Variations in the maximum transport rates for ammonium and nitrate in the prymnesiophyte Emiliania huxleyi and the raphidophyte Heterosigma carterae , 1999 .

[6]  M. R. Droop,et al.  The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture , 1974, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[7]  N. Crawford,et al.  Proteins for Transport of Water and Mineral Nutrients across the Membranes of Plant Cells , 1999, Plant Cell.

[8]  M. Fasham,et al.  A short version of the ammonium-nitrate interaction model , 1997 .

[9]  Daniel E Koshland.  The application and usefulness of the ratio k(cat)/K(M). , 2002, Bioorganic chemistry.

[10]  K. Flynn.  The determination of nitrogen status in microalgae , 1990 .

[11]  A. Visser,et al.  Modelling emergent trophic strategies in plankton , 2015 .

[12]  R. Geider,et al.  Redfield revisited: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis , 2002 .

[13]  T. Smayda.  The suspension and sinking of phytoplankton in the sea , 1970 .

[14]  G. Riley,et al.  Absorption of nutrients by aquatic plants , 1952 .

[15]  G. Bødtker,et al.  Relationship between phosphate affinities and cell size and shape in various bacteria and phytoplankton , 2009 .

[16]  R. Tollrian,et al.  Chemical cues, defence metabolites and the shaping of pelagic interspecific interactions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  F. Healey.  Slope of the Monod equation as an indicator of advantage in nutrient competition , 1980, Microbial Ecology.

[18]  G. Rhee,et al.  The effect of environmental factors on phytoplankton growth: Temperature and the interactions of temperature with nutrient limitation1 , 1981 .

[19]  S. Bressler,et al.  Nitrogen storage and use of biochemical indices to assess nitrogen deficiency and growth rate in natural plankton populations , 1985 .

[20]  Aditee Mitra,et al.  Promotion of harmful algal blooms by zooplankton predatory activity , 2006, Biology Letters.

[21]  M. Fasham,et al.  Accounting for grazing dynamics in nitrogen‐phytoplankton‐zooplankton (NPZ) models , 2007 .

[22]  Peter Franks,et al.  Planktonic ecosystem models: perplexing parameterizations and a failure to fail , 2009 .

[23]  Ø. Fiksen,et al.  Scaling Laws in Phytoplankton Nutrient Uptake Affinity , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[24]  Robert Eisenthal,et al.  Catalytic efficiency and kcat/KM: a useful comparator? , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[25]  K H Andersen,et al.  Characteristic Sizes of Life in the Oceans, from Bacteria to Whales. , 2016, Annual review of marine science.

[26]  V. Smetácek.  Role of sinking in diatom life-history cycles: ecological, evolutionary and geological significance , 1985 .

[27]  M. Fasham,et al.  Modelling the interactions between ammonium and nitrate uptake in marine phytoplankton , 1997 .

[28]  Jonathan Sharples,et al.  Phytoplankton motility and the competition for nutrients in the thermocline , 2007 .

[29]  K. Flynn.  HOW CRITICAL IS THE CRITICAL N:P RATIO?1 , 2002 .

[30]  Stephanie Dutkiewicz,et al.  Patterns of Diversity in Marine Phytoplankton , 2010, Science.

[31]  K. Flynn,et al.  Why Plankton Modelers Should Reconsider Using Rectangular Hyperbolic (Michaelis-Menten, Monod) Descriptions of Predator-Prey Interactions , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[32]  K. Flynn,et al.  Interactions between nitrate and ammonium in Emiliania huxleyi , 1999 .

[33]  K. Flynn,et al.  GROWTH OF HETEROSIGMA CARTERAE (RAPHIDOPHYCEAE) ON NITRATE AND AMMONIUM AT THREE PHOTON FLUX DENSITIES: EVIDENCE FOR N STRESS IN NITRATE‐GROWING CELLS , 1995 .

[34]  Y. Tsay,et al.  Nitrate transporters and peptide transporters , 2007, FEBS letters.

[35]  J. Gavis,et al.  Transport limited nutrient uptake rates in Ditylum brightwellii1 , 1975 .

[36]  D. Caron,et al.  Defining Planktonic Protist Functional Groups on Mechanisms for Energy and Nutrient Acquisition: Incorporation of Diverse Mixotrophic Strategies. , 2016, Protist.

[37]  J. Okie.  General Models for the Spectra of Surface Area Scaling Strategies of Cells and Organisms: Fractality, Geometric Dissimilitude, and Internalization , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Mridul K. Thomas,et al.  Allometric scaling and taxonomic variation in nutrient utilization traits and maximum growth rate of phytoplankton , 2012 .

[39]  Y. Collos.  Transient situations in nitrate assimilation by marine diatoms. 1. Changes in uptake parameters during nitrogen starvation1 , 1980 .

[40]  Y. Collos.  Transient situations in nitrate assimilation by marine diatoms. III. short-term uncoupling of nitrate uptake and reduction , 1982 .

[41]  R. Zwanzig.  Diffusion-controlled ligand binding to spheres partially covered by receptors: an effective medium treatment. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  K. Flynn.  Going for the slow burn: why should possession of a low maximum growth rate be advantageous for microalgae? , 2009 .

[43]  K. Flynn,et al.  Variation in elemental stoichiometry of the marine diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii (Bacillariophyceae) in response to combined nutrient stress and changes in carbonate chemistry , 2014, Journal of phycology.

[44]  B. Ward,et al.  MOLECULAR CLONING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH‐AFFINITY NITRATE TRANSPORTERS IN MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON 1 , 2007 .

[45]  Thomas Kiørboe,et al.  Turbulence, Phytoplankton Cell Size, and the Structure of Pelagic Food Webs , 1993 .

[46]  G. Pettersson.  Effect of evolution on the kinetic properties of enzymes. , 1989, European journal of biochemistry.

[47]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[48]  Sallie W. Chisholm,et al.  Emergent Biogeography of Microbial Communities in a Model Ocean , 2007, Science.

[49]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[50]  Dag L. Aksnes,et al.  A theoretical model for nutrient uptake in phytoplankton , 1991 .

[51]  D. L. Aksnes,et al.  Inherent and apparent traits in microbial nutrient uptake , 2011 .

[52]  K. Flynn.  Nitrate transport and ammonium-nitrate interactions at high nitrate concentrations and low temperature , 1999 .

[53]  K. Flynn.  The importance of the form of the quota curve and control of non-limiting nutrient transport in phytoplankton models , 2008 .

[54]  J. Beardall,et al.  Protein turnover in relation to maintenance metabolism at low photon flux in two marine microalgae , 2003 .

[55]  Peter A. Jumars,et al.  Physical constraints on marine osmotrophy in an optimal foraging context , 1993 .

[56]  J. Monod.  The Growth of Bacterial Cultures , 1949 .

[57]  S. Maeda,et al.  Nitrite Transport Activity of the ABC-Type Cyanate Transporter of the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[58]  Kevin J. Flynn,et al.  Predator–prey interactions: is ‘ecological stoichiometry’ sufficient when good food goes bad? , 2005 .

[59]  Antje Chang,et al.  BRENDA, the enzyme information system in 2011 , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[60]  A. Cembella,et al.  Vertical migration, nutrition and toxicity in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense , 1997 .

[61]  K. Flynn.  Estimation of kinetic parameters for the transport of nitrate and ammonium into marine phytoplankton , 1998 .

[62]  R. Sanders,et al.  Phagotrophy by the picoeukaryotic green alga Micromonas: implications for Arctic Oceans , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[63]  C. Molloy,et al.  EFFECTS OF NITROGEN DEPRIVATION ON RATES OF UPTAKE OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS BY THE DIATOM, PHAEODACTYLUM TRICORNUTUM BOHLIN. , 1986, The New phytologist.

[64]  J. Raven,et al.  What is the limit for photoautotrophic plankton growth rates? , 2017 .

[65]  K. Davidson,et al.  Accounting for nutrient processing time in mathematical models of phytoplankton growth , 1996 .

[66]  K. Flynn,et al.  N‐ASSIMILATION IN THE NOXIOUS FLAGELLATE HETEROSIGMA CARTERAE (RAPHIDOPHYCEAE): DEPENDENCE ON LIGHT, N‐SOURCE, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE1 , 2002 .

[67]  N. Garcia,et al.  Variability in Nitrate Uptake Kinetics of Phytoplankton Communities in a Mediterranean Coastal Lagoon , 1997 .

[68]  K. Flynn.  Modelling multi-nutrient interactions in phytoplankton; balancing simplicity and realism , 2003 .

[69]  K. Flynn,et al.  Nitrogen sources for the growth of marine microalgae: role of dissolved free amino acids , 1986 .

[70]  K. Flynn,et al.  The large capacity for dark nitrate-assimilation in diatoms may overcome nitrate limitation of growth. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[71]  S. Heaney,et al.  Light, temperature and nitrogen as interacting factors affecting diel vertical migrations of dinoflagellates in culture , 1981 .

[72]  E. Ceccarelli,et al.  Efficiency function for comparing catalytic competence. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[73]  J. Raven.  Nutrient transport in microalgae. , 1980, Advances in microbial physiology.

[74]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere , 2002 .

[75]  M. Follows,et al.  Trait‐based models of nutrient uptake in microbes extend the Michaelis‐Menten framework , 2013 .

[76]  Kevin J. Flynn,et al.  A mechanistic model for describing dynamic multi-nutrient, light, temperature interactions in phytoplankton , 2001 .

[77]  C. Klausmeier,et al.  Nutrient utilization traits of phytoplankton , 2015 .

[78]  Zoe V. Finkel,et al.  Phytoplankton in a changing world: cell size and elemental stoichiometry , 2010 .

[79]  K. Flynn,et al.  Do we need complex mechanistic photoacclimation models for phytoplankton? , 2003 .

[80]  Transient situations in nitrate assimilation by marine diatoms. 4. Non-linear phenomena and the estimation of the maximum uptake rate , 1983 .

[81]  T. Kana,et al.  Dynamic model of phytoplankton growth and acclimation: responses of the balanced growth rate and the chlorophyll a:carbon ratio to light, nutrient-limitation and temperature , 1997 .

[82]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Physiological stress and cell death in marine phytoplankton: Induction of proteases in response to nitrogen or light limitation , 1998 .

[83]  U. Sommer.  Some size relationships in phytoflagellate motility , 1988, Hydrobiologia.