The effects of slice thickness and radiation dose level variations on computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) nodule detection performance in pediatric chest CT scans

For pediatric oncology patients, CT scans are performed to assess treatment response and disease progression. CAD may be used to detect lung nodules which would reflect metastatic disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of reducing radiation dose and varying slice thickness on CAD performance in the detection of solid lung nodules in pediatric patients. The dataset consisted of CT scans of 58 pediatric chest cases, from which 7 cases had lung nodules detected by radiologist, and a total of 28 nodules were marked. For each case, the original raw data (sinogram data) was collected and a noise addition model was used to simulate reduced-dose scans of 50%, 25% and 10% of the original dose. In addition, the original and reduced-dose raw data were reconstructed at slice thicknesses of 1.5 and 3 mm using a medium sharp (B45) kernel; the result was eight datasets (4 dose levels x 2 thicknesses) for each case An in-house CAD tool was applied on all reconstructed scans, and results were compared with the radiologist’s markings. Patient level mean sensitivities at 3mm thickness were 24%, 26%, 25%, 27%, and at 1.5 mm thickness were 23%, 29%, 35%, 36% for 10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% dose level, respectively. Mean FP numbers were 1.5, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7 at 3 mm and 11.4, 3.5, 2.8, 2.8 at 1.5 mm thickness for 10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% dose level respectively. CAD sensitivity did not change with dose level for 3mm thickness, but did change with dose for 1.5 mm. False Positives increased at low dose levels where noise values were high.

[1]  Lukas Ebner,et al.  Optimal Dose Levels in Screening Chest CT for Unimpaired Detection and Volumetry of Lung Nodules, with and without Computer Assisted Detection at Minimal Patient Radiation , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[4]  Eran A Barnoy,et al.  Toward clinically usable CAD for lung cancer screening with computed tomography , 2014, European Radiology.

[5]  Gabriele Benz-Bohm,et al.  Radiation protection in pediatric radiology. , 2011, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[6]  C. McCollough,et al.  Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  C. McCollough,et al.  Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Robert G. Gould,et al.  Image quality and dose optimisation for infant CT using a paediatric phantom , 2016, European Radiology.

[9]  R W Günther,et al.  Performance evaluation of a computer-aided detection algorithm for solid pulmonary nodules in low-dose and standard-dose MDCT chest examinations and its influence on radiologists. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  M. Callahan,et al.  CT dose reduction in practice , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  H Rusinek,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[13]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Variability in CT lung-nodule volumetry: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods. , 2015, Medical physics.