Simulation‐based Learning in Engineering Education: Performance and Transfer in Learning Project Management

This paper reports empirical findings on the impact of keeping and reviewing learning history in a dynamic and interactive simulation environment of engineering education. The simulator for engineering project management had two learning history keeping modes: automatic (simulator-controlled) and manual (studentcontrolled), and a version with no history keeping. A group of industrial engineering students performed four simulation-runs divided into three identical simple scenarios (single project) and one complicated scenario (multi-project). The performances of participants running the simulation with the manual history mode were significantly better than users running the simulation with the automatic history mode. Moreover, the effects of using the history mechanism with the ability to undo further enhanced the learning process. The findings imply that students’ decision when to record the history during their engineering training process can have a particularly strong enhancing effect on learning. In addition, the simulator as educational innovation improves students learning and performance. The practical implications of using simulators in the field of engineering learning are discussed.

[1]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (Erp): The Dynamics of Operations Management , 1999 .

[2]  Avi Parush,et al.  Learning histories in simulation-based teaching: the effects on self-learning and transfer , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[3]  J. Wolfe.  A History of Business Teaching Games in English-Speaking and Post-Socialist Countries: The Origination and Diffusion of a Management Education and Development Technology , 1993 .

[4]  Phillip C. Wankat,et al.  Integrating the Use of Commercial Simulators into Lecture Courses , 2002 .

[5]  A Martin,et al.  A simulation engine for custom project management education , 2000 .

[6]  V. Ruohomäki,et al.  Viewpoints on learning and education with simulation games , 1994 .

[7]  James S. Collofello.  University/industry collaboration in developing a simulation-based software project management training course , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[8]  Tracy A. Thompson,et al.  Building a Strong Foundation: Using a Computer Simulation in an Introductory Management Course , 1997 .

[9]  Dorscine Spigner-Littles,et al.  CONSTRUCTIVISM: A PARADIGM FOR OLDER LEARNERS , 1999 .

[10]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  User interface design , 1990, ACM Press Frontier Series.

[11]  Fred B. Schneider,et al.  User Recovery and Reversal in Interactive Systems , 1984, TOPL.

[12]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  A framework for teaching and training in the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) era , 2001 .

[13]  Clifford E. Brown,et al.  An Evaluation of Computer-Supported Backtracking in a Hierarchical Database , 1992 .

[14]  R. Leach.  The learning curve , 1992 .

[15]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The Collaboratory Notebook , 1996, CACM.

[16]  D. Jonassen.  Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[17]  M. Nahvi,et al.  Dynamics of student-computer interaction in a simulation environment: reflections on curricular issues , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[18]  Jeffrey Scott Vitter.  US&R: A New Framework for Redoing , 1984, IEEE Software.

[19]  Lutz Prechelt.  Accelerating Learning from Experience: Avoiding Defects Faster , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[20]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[21]  B Hesketh,et al.  Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence , 2000, Ergonomics.

[22]  Sheng-Jen Tony Hsieh,et al.  Integrated Virtual Learning System for Programmable Logic Controller , 2004 .

[23]  Yiya Yang.  Undo Support Models , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Steven Beyerlein,et al.  The Learning Assessment Journal as a tool for structured reflection in process education , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[26]  A. Shtub,et al.  Learning and forgetting in mental and mechanical tasks: a comparative study , 1997 .

[27]  Hiroshi Toriya,et al.  UNDO and REDO Operations for Solid Modeling , 1986, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  Jimmy Nguyen,et al.  Development of Online Ultrasound Instructional Module and Comparison to Traditional Teaching Methods , 2002 .

[29]  Ezey M. Dar-El,et al.  A dual-phase model for the individual learning process in industrial tasks , 1995 .

[30]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[31]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  A CBT module with integrated simulation component for software project management education and training , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[32]  W. Estes.  Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. , 1955, Psychological review.