Knowledge, technology trajectories, and innovation in a developing country context: evidence from a survey of Malaysian firms

This paper investigates the applicability of contemporary firm-level innovation concepts to a developing country context by drawing on the results of a survey of Malaysian manufacturing and service establishments. We build on Keith Pavitt's 'technology trajectories' framework to empirically test the effect of firms' structure, strategy, resources, and environment on the probability of their product, process, and organisational innovations across various sectors. We find that Malaysian firms possess relatively high process and organisational innovation capabilities, but lag in new product development. Further, they more frequently utilise a variety of 'soft factors' like employee training, knowledge management practices, and collaboration with market actors as inputs to innovation rather than formal R&D. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings about Malaysian firms' technology trajectories to innovation policy in that country.

[1]  Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe,et al.  R & D cooperation and innovation activities of firms : Evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2002 .

[2]  Bogota Manual Standardisation of Indicators of Technological Innovation in Latin American and Caribbean Countries , 2001 .

[3]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[4]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[6]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation , 2002 .

[7]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  AGENCY COSTS AND INNOVATION , 1989 .

[8]  Roberto Basile,et al.  Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation , 2001 .

[9]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[10]  S. Mani Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis , 2002 .

[11]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Sources of innovative activities and industrial organization in Italy , 1991 .

[12]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[14]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation and Technological Change , 2003 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[16]  M. Freel,et al.  Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity , 2003 .

[17]  J. Sutz,et al.  LOOKING AT NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION FROM THE SOUTH , 2000 .

[18]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[19]  J. Boudreau Strategic Knowledge Measurement and Management , 2002 .

[20]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[21]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Professional Associations in Technology Diffusion , 1995 .

[22]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[24]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle , 1984 .

[25]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[26]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in large and small firms , 1987 .

[27]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[28]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[29]  H. Evers Transition towards a Knowledge Society: Malaysia and Indonesia in Comparative Perspective , 2003 .

[30]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .