Impact and Opportunities of Agroecological Intensification Strategies on Farm Performance: A Case Study of Banana-Based Systems in Central and South-Western Uganda

Agroecological intensification (AEI) practices relying on on-farm diversity tend to close nutrient cycles and reduce dependency on external inputs in agricultural systems. These practices improve the productivity of banana-based systems in Uganda, but their extent of implementation differs between and within regions. However, the impact of AEI practices on a broader range of objectives including environmental and nutritional objectives, is hardly quantified. Additionally, recommendations to improve the farm performance, given these options, are lacking. We, therefore, analyzed the current farm performance for these broad range of objectives and explored optimal farm reconfigurations in two Ugandan districts, one in Central Uganda and one in Southwestern (SW) Uganda. Given the heterogeneity of smallholder farms, a farm typology based on the applied AEI practices was developed. It classified the subsistence farms in Central Uganda into two extreme groups with an average of 11.0 and 16.4 AEI practices applied per farm. Farms in SW Uganda were moderately intensified (i.e., 13.0 practices). The FarmDESIGN model revealed a higher species diversity, relatively higher profitability (2,039 – 3,270 $/ha/year) and nutritional yield on farms in Central Uganda. However, relatively high soil erosion levels (0.243 – 0.240) and negative nitrogen (N) balances (−72 to −50 kg N/ha/year) were indicative of unsustainable practices. In contrast, farms in SW Uganda were less diverse and more market oriented. Their commercial orientation allowed investments in soil fertility management, resulting in more sustainable [low soil erosion level (0.172) and positive N balance (5 kg/ha/year)], but less profitable (506 $/ha/year) systems. To improve farm performance, bananas and other perennials played a key role. Explorations with Calliandra calothyrsus (Calliandra) hedgerow or Mucuna pruriens (Mucuna) cover crop increased on-farm mulch production, improved sustainability indicators and profitability. We conclude that AEI practices can improve farm performance, and a more intensive use would be beneficial. In addition, the FarmDESIGN model provides a useful tool for redesigning these farms, proposing different redesigns depending on farmers' objectives (profitability, productivity or sustainability), and for evaluating ex ante the impact of new agricultural measures on farm performance.

[1]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[2]  J. Rojas‐Sandoval.  Invasive species compendium. , 2020 .

[3]  R. Swennen,et al.  Optimizing Soil Fertility Management Strategies to Enhance Banana Production in Volcanic Soils of the Northern Highlands, Tanzania , 2020, Agronomy.

[4]  J. Groot,et al.  A model to examine farm household trade-offs and synergies with an application to smallholders in Vietnam , 2019, Agricultural Systems.

[5]  C. Staver,et al.  Assessing the potential of trees to sustain soil fertility in the banana agroforestry system in Uganda , 2019, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems.

[6]  I. Nuberg,et al.  Contrasting water use patterns of two important agroforestry tree species in the Mt Elgon region of Uganda , 2019, Australian Forestry.

[7]  R. Naghdi,et al.  Effect of skid trail curvature on residual tree damage , 2019, Australian Forestry.

[8]  E. Kikulwe,et al.  Challenges and opportunities for smallholders in banana value chains , 2018, Burleigh Dodds Series in Agricultural Science.

[9]  R. Swennen,et al.  Molecular and Cytogenetic Study of East African Highland Banana , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[10]  J. Groot,et al.  Capturing farm diversity with hypothesis-based typologies: An innovative methodological framework for farming system typology development , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  P. V. van Asten,et al.  Farm diversity and resource use efficiency: Targeting agricultural policy interventions in East Africa farming systems , 2017 .

[12]  K. Nyombi,et al.  Farmers’ knowledge of the banana ( Musa Sp.) agroforestry systems in Kiboga District, Central Uganda , 2017 .

[13]  M. Michalscheck,et al.  Characterising the diversity of smallholder farming systems and their constraints and opportunities for innovation: A case study from the Northern Region, Ghana , 2016 .

[14]  S. McClelland,et al.  The blurred boundaries of ecological, sustainable, and agroecological intensification: a review , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[15]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion? , 2011, Journal of Classification.

[16]  B. Vanlauwe,et al.  Agro-Ecological Intensification of Agricultural Systems in the African Highlands , 2013 .

[17]  A. Mabiso,et al.  Agricultural Commercialization, Land Expansion, and Homegrown Large-Scale Farmers: Insights from Ghana , 2013 .

[18]  S. Weise,et al.  Effectiveness of agro-ecological intensification practices in managing pests in smallholder banana systems in East and Central Africa , 2013 .

[19]  Jeroen C.J. Groot,et al.  Multi-objective optimization and design of farming systems , 2012 .

[20]  Jeroen C.J. Groot,et al.  Model‐aided learning for adaptive management of natural resources: an evolutionary design perspective , 2011 .

[21]  P. Legendre,et al.  Ward's Hierarchical Clustering Method: Clustering Criterion and Agglomerative Algorithm , 2011, ArXiv.

[22]  Guy Faure,et al.  How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review , 2011 .

[23]  A. Fermont,et al.  Drought is a major yield loss factor for rainfed East African highland banana , 2011 .

[24]  C. Staver,et al.  Agro-ecological intensification in banana and plantain (Musa spp.): an approach to develop more sustainable cropping systems for both smallholder farmers and large-scale commercial producers. , 2010 .

[25]  P. V. Asten,et al.  The agronomic and economic benefits of fertilizer and mulch use in highland banana systems in Uganda , 2010 .

[26]  P. V. Asten,et al.  Abiotic constraints override biotic constraints in East African highland banana systems , 2010 .

[27]  Keith D. Shepherd,et al.  The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa - A typology of smallholder farms , 2010 .

[28]  A. Kiggundu,et al.  Management options for highland banana pests and diseases in East and Central Africa. , 2009 .

[29]  Ken E. Giller,et al.  Increasing land pressure in East Africa: The changing role of cassava and consequences for sustainability of farming systems , 2008 .

[30]  C. Ong,et al.  Tree growth and management in Ugandan agroforestry systems: effects of root pruning on tree growth and crop yield. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[31]  J. Vrugt,et al.  Analysing trade-offs in resource and labour allocation by smallholder farmers using inverse modelling techniques: A case-study from Kakamega district, western Kenya , 2007 .

[32]  W. Rossing,et al.  Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality—A methodology to support discussions on land-use perspectives , 2007 .

[33]  M. Wijk,et al.  Nutrient use efficiencies and crop responses to N, P and manure applications in Zimbabwean soils: Exploring management strategies across soil fertility gradients , 2007 .

[34]  M. K. van Ittersum,et al.  A method for exploring sustainable development options at farm scale: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay , 2005 .

[35]  M. Bekunda,et al.  Use of the partial nutrient budget as an indicator of nutrient depletion in the highlands of southwestern Uganda , 2003, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[36]  C. Yamoah,et al.  Yield stability of cassava, maize, soya bean and cowpea intercrops , 2003, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[37]  D. Karamura,et al.  DIVERSITY, DISTRIBUTION AND FARMER PREFERENCE OF MUSA CULTIVARS IN UGANDA , 2002, Experimental Agriculture.

[38]  G. Schroth,et al.  Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry , 1995, Agroforestry Systems.

[39]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Root architecture in relation to tree-soil-crop interactions and shoot pruning in agroforestry , 1995, Agroforestry Systems.

[40]  K. Giller,et al.  Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems , 1993 .

[41]  W. Ocimati,et al.  Agronomic practices for Musa across different agro-ecological zones in Burundi, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda. , 2013 .

[42]  C. Staver,et al.  The use of trees and shrubs to improve banana productivity and production in central Uganda: an analysis of the current situation. , 2013 .

[43]  P. Baret,et al.  Coffee/banana intercropping as an opportunity for smallholder coffee farmers in Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. , 2013 .

[44]  G. Sileshi,et al.  Contributions of agroforestry to ecosystem services in the miombo eco-region of eastern and southern Africa , 2007 .

[45]  Edgar E. Twine,et al.  Food security in Eastern Africa and the Great Lakes , 2007 .

[46]  R. Fao,et al.  Cattle and small ruminant production systems in sub-Saharan Africa. A systematic review , 2002 .

[47]  J. Tenywa,et al.  Decomposition characteristics of mixed grass and banana residues and their effects on banana plant perfomance , 1997 .

[48]  R. Gutteridge,et al.  Forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture , 1994 .

[49]  J. Stoorvogel,et al.  Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in sub-Saharan Africa: 1983-2000. , 1990 .

[50]  A. Trichopoulou.  Food Composition Table , 1987 .