A learning program that ensures prompt and versatile vocal imitation

Here we show how a migratory songbird, the chipping sparrow (Spizella passerina), achieves prompt and precise vocal imitation. Juvenile chipping sparrow males develop five to seven potential precursor songs; the normal development of these songs requires intact hearing but not imitation from external models. The potential precursor songs conform with general species-typical song parameters but differ from the song of wild, adult territorial males. As chipping sparrow males return from migration to start their first breeding season, they settle close to an older adult. The young male then stops producing all but one of its precursor songs, retaining the one that most resembles that of its neighbor. This single song then becomes more variable and, in a matter of days, is altered to closely match the neighbor's song. This elegant solution ensures species specificity and promptness of imitation.

[1]  W. Thorpe COMMENTS ON ‘THE BIRD FANCYER'S DELIGHT’: TOGETHER WITH NOTES ON IMITATION IN THE SUB-SONG OF THE CHAFFINCH. , 2008 .

[2]  SONG LEARNING BY CHIPPING SPARROWS: WHEN, WHERE, AND FROM WHOM , 2006 .

[3]  P. Marler,et al.  Selection-based learning in bird song development. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  F. Nottebohm Neural lateralization of vocal control in a passerine bird , 1971 .

[5]  Charles T. Snowdon,et al.  Social Influences on Vocal Development , 2005 .

[6]  R. B. Payne,et al.  Song learning and social interaction in indigo buntings , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[8]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Acoustic communication in birds , 2003 .

[9]  Social influences on vocal development: Social interaction and sensitive phases for song learning: A critical review , 1997 .

[10]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  John D. Newman Social Influences on Vocal Development. , 1998 .

[12]  P. Marler,et al.  Song structure without auditory feedback: emendations of the auditory template hypothesis , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Imprinting and Cortical Plasticity , 1988, Neurology.

[14]  D. A. Nelson Song overproduction and selective attrition lead to song sharing in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  D. Bell,et al.  Song learning and vocal tradition in Nuttall's white-crowned sparrows , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  L. Baptista,et al.  Social interaction, sensitive phases and the song template hypothesis in the white-crowned sparrow , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  P. Marler Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[18]  D. Kroodsma Using appropriate experimental designs for intended hypotheses in ‘song’ playbacks, with examples for testing effects of song repertoire sizes , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Imprinting and cortical plasticity , 1987 .

[20]  C. E. Ho,et al.  A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity , 2000, Animal Behaviour.