Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT) - 22 to Brazilian Portuguese

UNLABELLED Quality of life questionnaires have been increasingly used in clinical trials to help establish the impact of medical intervention or to assess the outcome of health care services. Among disease-specific outcome measures, SNOT-22 was considered the most suitable tool for assessing chronic rhinosinusitis and patients with nasal polyps. AIMS To perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SNOT-22 to Brazilian Portuguese. METHODS Prospective study involving eighty-nine patients with chronic rhinosinusitis or nasal polyps submitted to functional endoscopic sinus surgery, who answered the questionnaire before and after surgery. Furthermore, 113 volunteers without sinonasal disease also answered the questionnaire. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measure validity, responsiveness and clinical interpretability were assessed. RESULTS Mean preoperative, postoperative and no sinonasal disease scores were 62.39, 23.09 and 11.42, respectively (p<0.0001); showing validity and responsiveness. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.9276). Reliability was sufficiently good, considering inter-interviewers (r=0.81) and intra-interviewers within a 10 to 14 day-interval (r=0.72). Surgery effect size was 1.55. Minimally important difference was 14 points; and scores up to 10 points were considered normal. CONCLUSION The Brazilian Portuguese SNOT-22 version is a valid instrument to assess patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.

[1]  J. Varni,et al.  Quality of life of children and adolescents from São Paulo: reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic Core Scales. , 2008, Jornal de pediatria.

[2]  V. Lund,et al.  Psychometric validity of the 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test , 2009, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[3]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  C. Hopkins,et al.  A pilot study of the SNOT 22 score in adults with no sinonasal disease , 2009, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[5]  Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli,et al.  Qualidade de vida de crianças e adolescentes de São Paulo: confiabilidade e validade da versão brasileira do questionário genérico Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM versão 4.0 , 2008 .

[6]  Ralph Metson,et al.  The Health Impact of Chronic Sinusitis in Patients Seeking Otolaryngologic Care , 1995 .

[7]  C. Hopkins,et al.  Patient reported outcome measures in rhinology. , 2009, Rhinology.

[8]  A D Morley,et al.  A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems – which is best? , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[9]  G P Samsa,et al.  Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  W. Fokkens,et al.  Quality‐assessment of disease‐specific quality of life questionnaires for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: a systematic review , 2007 .

[11]  J. Piccirillo,et al.  Psychometric and Clinimetric Validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (Snot-20) , 2002, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  M. J. B. C. Girão,et al.  Validação do questionário de qualidade de vida (King's Health Questionnaire) em mulheres brasileiras com incontinência urinária , 2005 .

[13]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.