Educational robotics as learning tools within the teaching and learning practice

The current study examines the integration of robotics as a learning tool (mindtool) in the teaching and learning process and its effectiveness in achieving specific learning objectives. Study's sample was twenty-one, 2nd graders that attended eleven lessons, in October - November 2012. To achieve the above the educational robotics package Lego Mindstorms NXT was used. Case study methodology was employed and 3 data collection methods were used: reflective journals, classroom observations and an evaluation assignment. The students managed to easily build the robots and relatively easily program the robots. The study highlights robotics' effectiveness as a tool to develop students' knowledge and skills, and achieve specific learning objectives and its important role in developing student-centered environments.

[1]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Designing, Developing, and Implementing a Course on LEGO Robotics for Technology Teacher Education , 2003 .

[2]  Henrik Hautop Lund,et al.  Robotics as an educational tool , 1999 .

[3]  Allison Bauerle,et al.  Toying With Technology: Bridging the Gap Between Education and Engineering , 2003 .

[4]  Russell K. Schutt,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 2011 .

[5]  J. Woodward.  Computers As Mindtools For Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[6]  L. Kyriakides,et al.  School Factors Explaining Achievement on Cognitive and Affective Outcomes: Establishing a Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness , 2010 .

[7]  Douglas Williams,et al.  A Preliminary Study Exploring the Use of Fictional Narrative in Robotics Activities , 2010 .

[8]  Florence R. Sullivan,et al.  Robotics and Discovery Learning: Pedagogical Beliefs, Teacher Practice, and Technology Integration , 2009 .

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[10]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[11]  J. Kolodner,et al.  Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design , 2005 .

[12]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Teaching with and about computers in secondary schools , 1993, CACM.

[13]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World , 1996 .

[14]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice , 1999 .

[15]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[16]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[17]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education. , 2002 .

[18]  Susan W. Haugland.  What Role Should Technology Play in Young Children's Learning? Part 2. Early Childhood Classrooms in the 21st Century: Using Computers to Maximize Learning , 2000 .

[19]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[20]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Computer Use by Teachers: Are Cuban's Predictions Correct? , 2001 .

[21]  Amy Eguchi.  Educational Robotics for Elementary School Classroom , 2007 .

[22]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation , 2000 .