Colour correspondence of a ceramic system in two different shade guides.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to test by means of a clinical spectrophotometer the ability of a ceramic system to correctly reproduce the selected shade with reference to two available shade guides. METHODS One shade for each guide of Vita Omega 900 ceramic system (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) was selected: A3 for the system based on Vitapan Classical; 2M3 for the system based on Vitapan 3D Master. Fifteen discs were fabricated for each ceramic using a proprietary steel mould that allowed to control the thickness of each layer. The total thickness of the specimen was 1.6mm. The thickness of the metal base disc was 0.3mm, while opaque was layered in 0.15mm. Dentin opaque (0.25-0.45mm), dentin (0.5-0.7mm), and enamel (0.1-0.3mm) were then layered following manufacturer's patterns. Each layer thickness was checked after firing. Easyshade (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) clinical spectrophotometer was used for colour comparison. "Restoration" mode was selected using A3 and 2M3 shades as comparison. The obtained DeltaE values were statistically analyzed with the Two-Way Analysis of Variance and the Tukey Test. RESULTS A closer colour correspondence resulted for the ceramic based on Vitapan 3D Master (DeltaE=1.80+/-0.42) than for Omega 900 in Vitapan Classical (DeltaE=2.94+/-0.12) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The shade matching ability of the VITA 3D-Master Tooth Guide was found to be more reliable than that of the VITA Classical Shade Guide for Omega 900.

[1]  A Baltzer,et al.  Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices. , 2005, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[2]  William M Johnston,et al.  Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  R. Paravina,et al.  Color comparison of two shade guides. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[4]  R. D. Douglas,et al.  Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  R. D. Douglas Precision of in vivo colorimetric assessments of teeth. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  R D Douglas,et al.  Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  S R Okubo,et al.  Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  Hans-Peter Weber,et al.  Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Stefan J Paul,et al.  Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[10]  Eugene Hittelman,et al.  The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  Ihab A Hammad,et al.  Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  C. Hämmerle,et al.  Visual and Spectrophotometric Shade Analysis of Human Teeth , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[13]  William M Johnston,et al.  Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.