Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization

It is widely known that industrialized building systems can positively impact construction projects in terms of efficiency, duration, safety, and quality. Although the use of industrialized building systems can potentially simplify the production process on-site, the complexity of the overall delivery system tends to be high, especially in engineered-to-order (ETO) environments, due to factors such as uncertainty related to goals and methods, conflicts between different trades on-site, and interdependence between supply chain members. This paper explores the concept of modularity, which has proven to be useful in different industries as a way of dealing with complex systems. The aim of this paper is to illustrate how modularity can reduce the complexity of ETO industrialized building systems, in companies that adopt a mass customization strategy. This investigation is based on two descriptive case studies on the development of modular structural steel systems for buildings that have adopted innovative beam-to-column connections. The main contribution of this research is demonstrating the need to adopt an integrated product and process-oriented conceptualization of modularity in industrialized building systems. Moreover, the comparison between the two case studies pointed out that the management of tolerances plays a key role in achieving high productivity and short lead times in structural steel building systems. This investigation also illustrates how the adoption of a limited set of modular components can be used to decouple design decisions, and standardize different types of processes.

[1]  Slavik Jablan,et al.  Modularity in Art , 2002 .

[2]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Improving the Delivery Process for Engineered-To-Order Products - Lessons Learned from Power Distribution Equipment , 2004 .

[3]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Jwm Will Bertrand,et al.  Production control in engineer-to-order firms , 1993 .

[6]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Modularity and the independence of functional requirements in designing complex systems , 1994 .

[7]  Jerker Lessing,et al.  Industrialised House-Building. Concept and Processes , 2006 .

[8]  David R. Riley,et al.  Decision support for construction method selection in concrete buildings: Prefabrication adoption and optimization , 2010 .

[9]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[10]  Nam P. Suh Development of the science base for the manufacturing field through the axiomatic approach , 1984 .

[11]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  Automated Erection of Structures Utilizing ATLSS Connections and a Robotic Crane , 1995 .

[12]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  Fundamental Modes of Operation for Mass Customization , 2003 .

[13]  Iamara Rossi Bulhões,et al.  Continuous Flow For Structural Design In Prefabricated Concrete Structures , 2008 .

[14]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  More Just-in-Time: Location of Buffers in Structural Steel Supply and Construction Processes , 1999 .

[15]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  The four roles of supply chain management in construction , 2000 .

[16]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach , 2005 .

[17]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Toward a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Fundamentals of Product Modularity , 1994 .

[19]  B. J. Pine Mass customizing products and services , 1993 .

[20]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[21]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  ATLSS Connections -- Concept, Development and Experimental Investigation , 1990 .

[22]  Joakim Wikner,et al.  Mass customization in terms of the customer order decoupling point , 2004 .

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[24]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[25]  H. Voordijk,et al.  Matching supply networks to a modular product architecture in the house-building industry , 2009 .

[26]  Gregory Howell,et al.  The Underlying Theory of Project Management Is Obsolete , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[27]  Asko Riitahuhta,et al.  DYNAMIC MODULARISATION - A CHALLENGE FOR DESIGN PROCESS AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE , 2003 .

[28]  M. Naim,et al.  Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda , 2009 .

[29]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  Studying the client's role in construction management , 1984 .

[30]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  4D CAD models to support the coordination of construction activities between contractors , 2015 .

[31]  Charles Crichton,et al.  Interdependence and uncertainty : a study of the building industry , 2001 .

[32]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Learning to see work flow: an application of lean concepts to precast concrete fabrication , 2003 .

[33]  Mazlin Mokhtar,et al.  Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study , 2012 .

[34]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  Automated Construction in the ATLSS Integrated Building Systems , 1993 .

[35]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modularity in design of products and systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[36]  Carlos Torres Formoso,et al.  Adopting Product Modularity in House Building to Support Mass Customisation , 2015 .

[37]  Johannes T. Voordijk,et al.  The concept of modularity in supply chains : A multiple case-study in the construction industry , 2006 .

[38]  Helena Johnsson,et al.  Platform use in systems building , 2014 .

[39]  N. D. Burns,et al.  Implications of postponement for the supply chain , 2003 .

[40]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Complexity - A Guided Tour , 2009 .

[41]  Terry Williams,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects , 1999 .

[42]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  A review of production planning and control: the applicability of key concepts to the make-to-order industry , 2005 .

[43]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[44]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[45]  Erwin Rauch,et al.  Synchronization of the Manufacturing Process and On-site Installation in ETO Companies , 2014 .

[46]  Carlos Torres Formoso,et al.  Guidelines for integrated planning and control of engineer-to-order prefabrication systems , 2013 .

[47]  Thomas Olofsson,et al.  Supply chains in the construction industry , 2010 .

[48]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Modular Product Design: A Life-Cycle View , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[49]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  Design and Implementation of ATLSS Connections , 1995 .

[50]  John M. Usher,et al.  Sequencing jobs in an engineer-to-order engineering environment , 2015 .

[51]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  Automated Construction and ATLSS Connections; Development, Analysis, Experimentation, and Implementation of ATLSS Connections for Automated Construction , 1993 .

[52]  Ronald O. Hamburger,et al.  Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05 , 2006 .

[53]  Hossein Zabihi,et al.  Definitions, concepts and new directions in Industrialized Building Systems (IBS) , 2013 .

[54]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  ATLSS Connections with Moment Capacity , 1993 .

[55]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Pull-Driven Scheduling for Pipe-Spool Installation: Simulation of Lean Construction Technique , 1998 .

[56]  Charles H. Fine CLOCKSPEED‐BASED STRATEGIES FOR SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN1 , 2009 .

[57]  Dave Alford,et al.  Mass customisation } an automotive perspective , 2000 .

[58]  Lars Hvam,et al.  Utilizing platforms in industrialized construction A case study of a precast manufacturer , 2017 .