Branching, blending, and the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations

It has been claimed that blending processes such as trade and exchange have always been more important in the evolution of cultural similarities and differences among human populations than the branching process of population fissioning. In this paper, we report the results of a novel comparative study designed to shed light on this claim. We fitted the bifurcating tree model that biologists use to represent the relationships of species to 21 biological data sets that have been used to reconstruct the relationships of species and/or higher level taxa and to 21 cultural data sets. We then compared the average fit between the biological data sets and the model with the average fit between the cultural data sets and the model. Given that the biological data sets can be confidently assumed to have been structured by speciation, which is a branching process, our assumption was that, if cultural evolution is dominated by blending processes, the fit between the bifurcating tree model and the cultural data sets should be significantly worse than the fit between the bifurcating tree model and the biological data sets. Conversely, if cultural evolution is dominated by branching processes, the fit between the bifurcating tree model and the cultural data sets should be no worse than the fit between the bifurcating tree model and the biological data sets. We found that the average fit between the cultural data sets and the bifurcating tree model was not significantly different from the fit between the biological data sets and the bifurcating tree model. This indicates that the cultural data sets are not less tree-like than are the biological data sets. As such, our analysis does not support the suggestion that blending processes have always been more important than branching processes in cultural evolution. We conclude from this that, rather than deciding how cultural evolution has proceeded a priori, researchers need to ascertain which model or combination of models is relevant in a particular case and why.

[1]  R. Gray,et al.  Hop, step and gape: do the social displays of the Pelecaniformes reflect phylogeny? , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Alice B. Kehoe.  Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins , 1989, American Antiquity.

[3]  M. Collard,et al.  Cultural Historical Context of Qwu?gwes (Puget Sound, USA): a Preliminary Investigation , 2005 .

[4]  O. Bininda-Emonds.  The phylogenetic relationships of the extant phocid seals (Mammalia: Carnivora: Phocidae) , 1995 .

[5]  G. Wainwright.  The Making of Egypt , 1939, Nature.

[6]  A. Ortolani,et al.  A Study of East African Kinship and Marriage Using a Phylogenetically Based Comparative Method , 2001 .

[7]  A. Yoder,et al.  Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor , 2003, Nature.

[8]  Stephen Shennan,et al.  Cultural transmission, language, and basketry traditions amongst the California Indians , 2003 .

[9]  M. Ghiselin,et al.  Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity , 1991, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[10]  Diana J. Kao,et al.  Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  The making of Egypt , 1939 .

[12]  B. Hewlett,et al.  Cultural variation in Africa: role of mechanisms of transmission and adaptation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  K. M. Kelly,et al.  Foregone Conclusions? , 2001, Current Anthropology.

[14]  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder,et al.  Using phylogenetically based comparative methods in anthropology: More questions than answers , 2001 .

[15]  W. Hennig.  Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik , 1950 .

[16]  N. Warren.  Studies in cross-cultural psychology , 1977 .

[17]  Barry S. Hewlett,et al.  Cultural Transmission Among Aka Pygmies , 1986 .

[18]  J. Jorgensen,et al.  Salish language and culture , 1969 .

[19]  H. Spencer,et al.  PHYLOGENY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND TAXONOMY OF AUSTRALASIAN TEALS , 2000 .

[20]  Luisa Maffi,et al.  On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment , 2001 .

[21]  E. Wilson,et al.  Genes, mind, and culture : the coevolutionary process , 1982 .

[22]  R DeSalle,et al.  Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[23]  Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  The Neolithic Transition and the Genetics of Populations in Europe. , 2009 .

[24]  B. Wood,et al.  How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Gray,et al.  The phylogenetic relationships of the shags and cormorants: can sequence data resolve a disagreement between behavior and morphology? , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[26]  Kevin de Queiroz,et al.  Phylogenetic Relationships and Tempo of Early Diversification in Anolis Lizards , 1999 .

[27]  L. Morgan.  Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family , 2021, Politics and Kinship.

[28]  R. Wayne,et al.  Molecular systematics of the Canidae. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[29]  Peter J. Richerson,et al.  Are Cultural Phylogenies Possible ? , 1997 .

[30]  K. V. Flannery,et al.  Predicting Similarity in Material Culture among New Guinea Villages from Propinquity and Language: A Log-linear Approach [and Comments and Reply] , 1995, Current Anthropology.

[31]  A. Romney,et al.  Material Culture, Geographic Propinquity, and Linguistic Affiliation on the North Coast of New Guinea: A Reanalysis of Welsch, Terrell, and Nadolski (1992) , 1994 .

[32]  R. Mace,et al.  The evolution of cultural diversity : a phylogenetic approach , 2005 .

[33]  Stephen Shennan,et al.  Cultural learning in hominids: a behavioural ecological approach , 1999 .

[34]  M. Hurles,et al.  Untangling Oceanic settlement: the edge of the knowable , 2003 .

[35]  Comment on Foregone Conclusions? In Search of Papuans and Austronesians by JJ E Terrell, K M Kelly, and P Rainbird , 2001 .

[36]  Peter Bellwood.  Phylogeny vs reticulation in prehistory , 1996, Antiquity.

[37]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Genes, Mind and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. , 1982 .

[38]  Bernard Wood,et al.  Homoplasy and earlyHomo: an analysis of the evolutionary relationships ofH. habilissensu stricto andH. rudolfensis , 1996 .

[39]  K. M. Kelly,et al.  Foregone Conclusions? , 2001, Current Anthropology.

[40]  W.-R. Schmidt,et al.  The culture historical method of ethnology , 1939 .

[41]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Cladistics Is Useful for Reconstructing Archaeological Phylogenies: Palaeoindian Points from the Southeastern United States , 2001 .

[42]  W. Rivers,et al.  The history of Melanesian society , 1973 .

[43]  P. Kirch,et al.  History, Phylogeny, and Evolution in Polynesia [and Comments and Reply] , 1987, Current Anthropology.

[44]  Randall T. Schuh,et al.  Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications , 1999 .

[45]  K. Gibson,et al.  Mammalian social learning : comparative and ecological perspectives , 1999 .

[46]  P. Greenfield.  A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. , 1984 .

[47]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Homoplasy and early Homo: an analysis of the evolutionary relationships of H. habilis sensu stricto and H. rudolfensis , 1996 .

[48]  John A. Endler,et al.  Speciation and Its Consequences , 1989 .

[49]  M. Schaller,et al.  Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices , 2003 .

[50]  Niles Eldredge,et al.  Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology , 1981 .

[51]  A Piazza,et al.  Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Peter Bellwood.  EARLY AGRICULTURALIST POPULATION DIASPORAS ?F ARMING ,L ANGUAGES, AND GENES , 2001 .

[53]  James S. Farris,et al.  The retention index and homoplasy excess , 1989 .

[54]  Kenneth M. Halanych,et al.  Multiple Substitutions Affect the Phylogenetic Utility of Cytochrome b and 12S rDNA Data: Examining a Rapid Radiation in Leporid (Lagomorpha) Evolution , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[55]  Terry L. Hunt,et al.  Human Diversity and the Myth of the Primitive Isolate , 1997, Current Anthropology.

[56]  A. Di Fiore,et al.  Evolution of social organization: a reappraisal for primates by using phylogenetic methods. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  W. Durham.  Applications of Evolutionary Culture Theory , 1992 .

[58]  Colin Renfrew,et al.  ARCHAEOLOGY, GENETICS AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY* , 1992 .

[59]  R. Dewar.  Of nets and trees: Untangling the reticulate and dendritic in Madagascar's prehistory , 1995 .

[60]  J. Farris.  EXCESS HOMOPLASY RATIOS , 1991 .

[61]  S. Shennan,et al.  Ethnogenesis versus phylogenesis in prehistoric culture change: a case-study using European Neolithic pottery and biological phylogenetic techniques , 2000 .

[62]  Doug Jones.  Kinship and Deep History: Exploring Connections between Culture Areas, Genes, and Languages , 2003 .

[63]  Fredrick Barth,et al.  Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture , 1971 .

[64]  C. Guyer,et al.  Oadistic relationships among anoles (Sauria: Iguanidae) , 1986 .

[65]  P. Kirch,et al.  History, Phylogeny, and Evolution in Polynesia , 1992, Current Anthropology.

[66]  Z. Yang,et al.  Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[67]  C. Guglielmino,et al.  Semes and Genes in Africa1 , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[68]  James W. Archie,et al.  A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data , 1989 .

[69]  P. Greenfield,et al.  History, Culture, Learning, and Development , 2000 .

[70]  I. Hodder.  Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture , 1982 .

[71]  J. Farris.  THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[72]  F. Boas.  Race, Language and Culture , 1940 .

[73]  H. S. HARRISON,et al.  The Diffusion of Culture , 1933, Nature.

[74]  J. Geisler,et al.  The position of Cetacea within mammalia: phylogenetic analysis of morphological data from extinct and extant taxa. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[75]  B. Wood,et al.  Soft‐tissue anatomy of the extant hominoids: a review and phylogenetic analysis , 2002, Journal of anatomy.

[76]  I. Kitching.  Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis , 1998 .

[77]  A. Yoder.  Relative position of the Cheirogaleidae in strepsirhine phylogeny: a comparison of morphological and molecular methods and results. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[78]  M. Collard,et al.  Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles , 2002 .

[79]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Comparison of likelihood and Bayesian methods for estimating divergence times using multiple gene Loci and calibration points, with application to a radiation of cute-looking mouse lemur species. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[80]  F. Gil-White,et al.  Are Ethnic Groups Biological “Species” to the Human Brain? , 2001, Current Anthropology.

[81]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Mapping our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Methods in Anthropology and Prehistory , 2006 .

[82]  W. Goodenough.  Outline of a Framework for a Theory of Cultural Evolution , 1999 .

[83]  J. Terrell.  Archaeology, Language, and History: Essays on Culture and Ethnicity , 2001 .

[84]  J. H. Moon.  Putting Anthropology Back Togedier Again: The Ethnogenetic Critique of Cladistic Theory 925 , 1994 .

[85]  D. F. Roberts,et al.  The History and Geography of Human Genes , 1996 .

[86]  F. Noll,et al.  Behavioral Phylogeny of Corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), with Special Reference to Social Behavior , 2002, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[87]  C. Renfrew,et al.  Archaeogenetics : DNA and the population prehistory of Europe , 2000 .

[88]  S. Emlen,et al.  Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[90]  J. Diamond,et al.  Farmers and Their Languages: The First Expansions , 2003, Science.

[91]  R. Mcelreath,et al.  Shared Norms and the Evolution of Ethnic Markers , 2003, Current Anthropology.

[92]  Robert L. Welsch,et al.  Language and Culture on the North Coast of New Guinea , 1992 .

[93]  K. Laland,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: IS HUMAN CULTURAL EVOLUTION DARWINIAN? EVIDENCE REVIEWED FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[94]  J. Terrell.  History as a family tree, history as an entangled bank: constructing images and interpretations of prehistory in the South Pacific , 1988, Antiquity.

[95]  A. Meyer,et al.  Platyrrhine systematics: a simultaneous analysis of molecular and morphological data. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[96]  J. Alden Mason,et al.  : University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Volume 21, 1924-1927 . , 1928 .

[97]  Newton E. Morton,et al.  The Neolithic Transition and the Genetics of Populations in Europe. , 2022 .

[98]  H. G. Barnett.  Culture element distributions : VII : Oregon Coast , 1937 .

[99]  Gareth Nelson,et al.  Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance , 1981 .