On size, distance, and visual angle perception

University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, Wisconsin Standard descriptions of visual spatial experiences, especially illusions, create destructive paradoxes because, along with the perceived distance variable (D’), they use only one “perceived size” variable (S′) in the equation S′/D′ = V′ rad, to describe perception of a target’s linear size, S m, its distance, D m, from the eye, and the visual angle, V deg, its outer edges subtend at the eye. Simple paradoxes vanish in descriptions using the different equation, S’/D’ = V’ rad, which adds the perceived visual angle variable, V′ rad. Redefining classic illusions as illustrations primarily of misperceived direction difference (V) values removes the pseudoparadoxes that have made Extant explanations of illusions seem unsatisfactory.

[1]  K. Koffka Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[2]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[3]  E. Brunswik,et al.  Distal focussing of perception: Size-constancy in a representative sample of situations. , 1944 .

[4]  Robert E. Bannon,et al.  SPATIAL SENSE AND MOVEMENTS OF THE EYE , 1948 .

[5]  R. B. Joynson The Problem of Size and Distance , 1949 .

[6]  Accuracy of Visual Estimation of Azimuth Position , 1950 .

[7]  A. H. Hastorf,et al.  The influence of suggestion on the relationship between stimulus size and perceived distance. , 1950, The Journal of psychology.

[8]  H SCHLOSBERG,et al.  A note on depth perception, size constancy, and related topics. , 1950, Psychological review.

[9]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[10]  A. S. Gilinsky Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[11]  J. Gibson,et al.  The visual field and the visual world: a reply to Professor Boring. , 1952, Psychological review.

[12]  E. Boring,et al.  Visual perception as invariance. , 1952, Psychological review.

[13]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  The size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1953, Psychological review.

[14]  R C BOLLES,et al.  Importance of object recognition in size constancy. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  R. B. Joynson An Experimental Synthesis of the Associations and Gestalt Accounts of the Perception of Size: Part I , 1958 .

[16]  C. O. Roelofs,et al.  Considerations on the visual egocentre , 1959 .

[17]  Jacob Nachmias,et al.  The Effect of Oculomotor Adjustments on Apparent Size , 1959 .

[18]  W. H. Ittelson Visual space perception , 1961 .

[19]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  L. Kaufman,et al.  The moon illusion. , 1962, Scientific American.

[21]  W C GOGEL,et al.  The visual perception of size and distance. , 1962, [Report]. Civil Aeromedical Research Institute.

[22]  James G. Taylor The behavioral basis of perception , 1962 .

[23]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[24]  L. Kaufman,et al.  The Moon Illusion, II , 1962, Science.

[25]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[26]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The perception of visual angle , 1964 .

[27]  W. Gogel,et al.  EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  D. McCready,et al.  Size-distance perception and accommodation-convergence micropsia--a critique. , 1965, Vision research.

[29]  L. Ganz Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. , 1966, Psychological review.

[30]  H. Ono,et al.  Distal and proximal size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  W R Biersdorf,et al.  Convergence and apparent distance as correlates of size judgments at near distances. , 1966, The Journal of general psychology.

[32]  L. Ganz Is the figural aftereffect an aftereffect? A review of its intensity, onset, decay, and transfer characteristics. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[34]  W. Richards Apparent modifiability of receptive fields during accommodation and convergence and a model for size constancy , 1967 .

[35]  L. Festinger,et al.  Efference and the conscious experience of perception , 1967 .

[36]  R. Over Explanations of geometrical illusions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  C. W. White,et al.  Eye movements and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion , 1968 .

[38]  John C. Baird,et al.  Toward a theory of frontal-size judgments , 1968 .

[39]  F. Restle,et al.  An adaptation-level theory account of a relative-size illusion , 1968 .

[40]  W C Gogel,et al.  The sensing of retinal size. , 1969, Vision research.

[41]  H. Ono,et al.  Apparent distance as a function of familiar size. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.

[43]  M. Coltheart The influence of haptic size information upon visual judgments of absolute distance , 1969 .

[44]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Emmert's laws. Size constancy vs. optical geometry. , 1970, The American journal of psychology.

[45]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[46]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  John C. Baird,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – ANALYSIS OF VISUAL SPACE , 1970 .

[48]  F Restle Moon illusion explained on the basis of relative size. , 1970, Science.

[49]  F. Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  D W Massaro,et al.  Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  G. H. Fisher Geometrical illusions and figural after-effects: the mechanism and its location. , 1971, Vision research.

[52]  James J. Gibson,et al.  The Information Available in Pictures , 1971 .

[53]  W. Richards Size-Distance Transformations , 1971 .

[54]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction , 1971 .

[55]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The effect of verbal size information upon visual judgments of absolute distance , 1971 .

[56]  R. Day Visual Spatial Illusions: A General Explanation , 1972, Science.

[57]  A. Pressey The assimilation theory of geometric illusions: An additional postulate , 1972 .

[58]  W. Epstein,et al.  The Process of ‘Taking-into-Account’ in Visual Perception , 1973, Perception.

[59]  E. H. Walker A mathematical theory of optical illusions and figural aftereffects , 1973 .

[60]  M. Hagen,et al.  Picture perception: toward a theoretical model. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Oculomotor adjustments and size-distance perception , 1974 .

[62]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Size-distance paradox with accommodative micropsia , 1974 .

[63]  S. Anstis,et al.  Size adaptation to visual texture and print: evidence for spatial-frequency analysis. , 1974, The American journal of psychology.

[64]  Carl Auerbach,et al.  A common auditory-visual space” Evidence for its reality , 1974 .

[65]  John C. Baird,et al.  Psychophysical analysis of visual space , 1974 .

[66]  J. P. Harris,et al.  Illusion-Destruction by Appropriate Scaling , 1975 .

[67]  The Contribution of Relational Factors to Line-Length Matches , 1976, Perception.

[68]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimensionstop vs. continuant , 1976 .

[69]  T. Oyama Feature Analysers, Optical Illusions, and Figural Aftereffects , 1977, Perception.

[70]  John F. Sherry,et al.  The accuracy of two-dimensional saccades in the absence of continuing retinal stimulation , 1977, Vision Research.

[71]  F. Attneave,et al.  Accuracy of extrapolating a pointer into perceived and imagined space. , 1978, The American journal of psychology.

[72]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  Stanley Coren,et al.  Perceptual Phenomena. (Book Reviews: Seeing Is Deceiving. The Psychology of Visual Illusions) , 1978 .

[74]  I. Rock,et al.  Pictorial Depth and Related Constancy Effects as a Function of Recognition , 1978, Perception.

[75]  T Jaeger,et al.  Ebbinghaus illusions: Size contrast or contour interaction phenomena? , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  H. Ono,et al.  Four methods of locating the egocenter: A comparison of their predictive validities and reliabilities , 1979 .

[77]  H Ono Axiomatic summary and deductions from Hering’s principles of visual direction , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[78]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[79]  D. Weintraub,et al.  Ebbinghaus illusion: context, contour, and age influence the judged size of a circle amidst circles. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[81]  R. Remington Attention and saccadic eye movements. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[82]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Familiar size and linear perspective as distance cues in stereoscopic depth constancy , 1980 .

[83]  S. Pinker Mental imagery and the third dimension. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[84]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[85]  H. Ono,et al.  On Wells’s (1792) law of visual direction , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[86]  R Pasnak,et al.  The Effect of Familiar Size at Familiar Distances , 1982, Perception.

[87]  H. Ono,et al.  The cyclopean eye vs. the sighting-dominant eye as the center of visual direction , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[88]  J. Baird The moon illusion: II. A reference theory. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[89]  M. Hershenson Moon illusion and spiral aftereffect: illusions due to the loom-zoom system? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[90]  Assumed distance as a determinant of apparent size , 1982 .

[91]  I. Rock The Logic of Perception , 1983 .

[92]  M. Wagner,et al.  The metric of visual space , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.