On size, distance, and visual angle perception
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Koffka. Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .
[2] Alfred H. Holway,et al. Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .
[3] E. Brunswik,et al. Distal focussing of perception: Size-constancy in a representative sample of situations. , 1944 .
[4] Robert E. Bannon,et al. SPATIAL SENSE AND MOVEMENTS OF THE EYE , 1948 .
[5] R. B. Joynson. The Problem of Size and Distance , 1949 .
[6] Accuracy of Visual Estimation of Azimuth Position , 1950 .
[7] A. H. Hastorf,et al. The influence of suggestion on the relationship between stimulus size and perceived distance. , 1950, The Journal of psychology.
[8] H SCHLOSBERG,et al. A note on depth perception, size constancy, and related topics. , 1950, Psychological review.
[9] J. Gibson. The perception of the visual world , 1951 .
[10] A. S. Gilinsky. Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.
[11] J. Gibson,et al. The visual field and the visual world: a reply to Professor Boring. , 1952, Psychological review.
[12] E. Boring,et al. Visual perception as invariance. , 1952, Psychological review.
[13] W. H. Ittelson,et al. The size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1953, Psychological review.
[14] R C BOLLES,et al. Importance of object recognition in size constancy. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.
[15] R. B. Joynson. An Experimental Synthesis of the Associations and Gestalt Accounts of the Perception of Size: Part I , 1958 .
[16] C. O. Roelofs,et al. Considerations on the visual egocentre , 1959 .
[17] Jacob Nachmias,et al. The Effect of Oculomotor Adjustments on Apparent Size , 1959 .
[18] W. H. Ittelson. Visual space perception , 1961 .
[19] W. Epstein,et al. The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.
[20] L. Kaufman,et al. The moon illusion. , 1962, Scientific American.
[21] W C GOGEL,et al. The visual perception of size and distance. , 1962, [Report]. Civil Aeromedical Research Institute.
[22] James G. Taylor. The behavioral basis of perception , 1962 .
[23] Hermann von Helmholtz,et al. Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .
[24] L. Kaufman,et al. The Moon Illusion, II , 1962, Science.
[25] R. Gregory,et al. Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.
[26] Irvin Rock,et al. The perception of visual angle , 1964 .
[27] W. Gogel,et al. EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.
[28] D. McCready,et al. Size-distance perception and accommodation-convergence micropsia--a critique. , 1965, Vision research.
[29] L. Ganz. Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. , 1966, Psychological review.
[30] H. Ono,et al. Distal and proximal size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.
[31] W R Biersdorf,et al. Convergence and apparent distance as correlates of size judgments at near distances. , 1966, The Journal of general psychology.
[32] L. Ganz. Is the figural aftereffect an aftereffect? A review of its intensity, onset, decay, and transfer characteristics. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.
[33] A. L. I︠A︡rbus. Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .
[34] W. Richards. Apparent modifiability of receptive fields during accommodation and convergence and a model for size constancy , 1967 .
[35] L. Festinger,et al. Efference and the conscious experience of perception , 1967 .
[36] R. Over. Explanations of geometrical illusions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.
[37] C. W. White,et al. Eye movements and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion , 1968 .
[38] John C. Baird,et al. Toward a theory of frontal-size judgments , 1968 .
[39] F. Restle,et al. An adaptation-level theory account of a relative-size illusion , 1968 .
[40] W C Gogel,et al. The sensing of retinal size. , 1969, Vision research.
[41] H. Ono,et al. Apparent distance as a function of familiar size. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[42] C. Blakemore,et al. Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.
[43] M. Coltheart. The influence of haptic size information upon visual judgments of absolute distance , 1969 .
[44] G. T. Gardner,et al. Emmert's laws. Size constancy vs. optical geometry. , 1970, The American journal of psychology.
[45] R. Gregory. The intelligent eye , 1970 .
[46] C. Blakemore,et al. The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.
[47] John C. Baird,et al. CHAPTER 1 – ANALYSIS OF VISUAL SPACE , 1970 .
[48] F Restle. Moon illusion explained on the basis of relative size. , 1970, Science.
[49] F. Campbell,et al. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.
[50] D W Massaro,et al. Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.
[51] G. H. Fisher. Geometrical illusions and figural after-effects: the mechanism and its location. , 1971, Vision research.
[52] James J. Gibson,et al. The Information Available in Pictures , 1971 .
[53] W. Richards. Size-Distance Transformations , 1971 .
[54] Walter C. Gogel,et al. The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction , 1971 .
[55] Max Coltheart,et al. The effect of verbal size information upon visual judgments of absolute distance , 1971 .
[56] R. Day. Visual Spatial Illusions: A General Explanation , 1972, Science.
[57] A. Pressey. The assimilation theory of geometric illusions: An additional postulate , 1972 .
[58] W. Epstein,et al. The Process of ‘Taking-into-Account’ in Visual Perception , 1973, Perception.
[59] E. H. Walker. A mathematical theory of optical illusions and figural aftereffects , 1973 .
[60] M. Hagen,et al. Picture perception: toward a theoretical model. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.
[61] Hiroshi Ono,et al. Oculomotor adjustments and size-distance perception , 1974 .
[62] Hiroshi Ono,et al. Size-distance paradox with accommodative micropsia , 1974 .
[63] S. Anstis,et al. Size adaptation to visual texture and print: evidence for spatial-frequency analysis. , 1974, The American journal of psychology.
[64] Carl Auerbach,et al. A common auditory-visual space” Evidence for its reality , 1974 .
[65] John C. Baird,et al. Psychophysical analysis of visual space , 1974 .
[66] J. P. Harris,et al. Illusion-Destruction by Appropriate Scaling , 1975 .
[67] The Contribution of Relational Factors to Line-Length Matches , 1976, Perception.
[68] Randy L. Diehl,et al. Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimensionstop vs. continuant , 1976 .
[69] T. Oyama. Feature Analysers, Optical Illusions, and Figural Aftereffects , 1977, Perception.
[70] John F. Sherry,et al. The accuracy of two-dimensional saccades in the absence of continuing retinal stimulation , 1977, Vision Research.
[71] F. Attneave,et al. Accuracy of extrapolating a pointer into perceived and imagined space. , 1978, The American journal of psychology.
[72] S M Kosslyn,et al. Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[73] Stanley Coren,et al. Perceptual Phenomena. (Book Reviews: Seeing Is Deceiving. The Psychology of Visual Illusions) , 1978 .
[74] I. Rock,et al. Pictorial Depth and Related Constancy Effects as a Function of Recognition , 1978, Perception.
[75] T Jaeger,et al. Ebbinghaus illusions: Size contrast or contour interaction phenomena? , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.
[76] H. Ono,et al. Four methods of locating the egocenter: A comparison of their predictive validities and reliabilities , 1979 .
[77] H Ono. Axiomatic summary and deductions from Hering’s principles of visual direction , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[78] J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .
[79] D. Weintraub,et al. Ebbinghaus illusion: context, contour, and age influence the judged size of a circle amidst circles. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[80] G. Shulman,et al. Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[81] R. Remington. Attention and saccadic eye movements. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[82] Hans Wallach,et al. Familiar size and linear perspective as distance cues in stereoscopic depth constancy , 1980 .
[83] S. Pinker. Mental imagery and the third dimension. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[84] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[85] H. Ono,et al. On Wells’s (1792) law of visual direction , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[86] R Pasnak,et al. The Effect of Familiar Size at Familiar Distances , 1982, Perception.
[87] H. Ono,et al. The cyclopean eye vs. the sighting-dominant eye as the center of visual direction , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.
[88] J. Baird. The moon illusion: II. A reference theory. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[89] M. Hershenson. Moon illusion and spiral aftereffect: illusions due to the loom-zoom system? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[90] Assumed distance as a determinant of apparent size , 1982 .
[91] I. Rock. The Logic of Perception , 1983 .
[92] M. Wagner,et al. The metric of visual space , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.