New Cadanav methodology for quantitative rock fall hazard assessment and zoning at the local scale

Rock fall hazard zoning is a challenging yet necessary task to be accomplished for planning an appropriate land use in mountainous areas. Methodologies currently adopted for elaborating zoning maps do not provide satisfactory results though, due to uncertainties and related assumptions characterising hazard assessment. The new Cadanav methodology, presented in this paper, aims at improving quantitative hazard assessment and zoning at the local scale, by reducing uncertainties mainly related to the technique for combining rock fall intensity and frequency of occurrence. Starting from available information on rock fall failure frequency and trajectory simulation results, the procedure merges in a strict way temporal frequency, probability of reach and energy data and evaluates the hazard degree by means of “hazard curves”. These curves are described at each point of the slope by a series of energy–return period couples representing the hazardous conditions which may possibly affect that location. The new Cadanav methodology is here detailed and compared to its original version. Hazard zoning results are illustrated along two different 2D slope profiles, for linear homogeneous cliff configurations, and according to the Swiss intensity–frequency diagram for rock fall hazard zoning. However, the procedure can be easily used with any other intensity–frequency diagram prescribed in national guidelines and, additionally, extended to problems involving 3D topographies.

[1]  M. Jaboyedoff,et al.  An attempt to refine rockfall hazard zoning based on the kinetic energy, frequency and fragmentation degree , 2005 .

[2]  Giovanni B. Crosta,et al.  A methodology for physically based rockfall hazard assessment , 2003 .

[3]  S. Evans,et al.  Magnitude and frequency of rock falls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of southwestern British Columbia , 1999 .

[4]  Didier Hantz,et al.  An historical, geomechanical and probabilistic approach to rock-fall hazard assessment , 2003 .

[5]  Luuk Dorren,et al.  Rockfall characterisation and structural protection – a review , 2011 .

[6]  C. F. Lee,et al.  Rockfall Hazard Analysis for Hong Kong Based on Rockfall Inventory , 2003 .

[7]  Christophe Bonnard,et al.  Landslide risk management in Switzerland , 2005 .

[8]  H. Raetzo,et al.  Hazard assessment in Switzerland – Codes of Practice for mass movements , 2002 .

[9]  V. Labiouse,et al.  Rockfall Hazard Zoning for Land Use Planning , 2014 .

[10]  J. Corominas,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the residual risk in a rockfall protected area , 2005 .

[11]  Agnès Helmstetter,et al.  Probabilistic approach to rock fall hazard assessment: potential of historical data analysis , 2002 .

[12]  R. Poisel,et al.  IS THERE A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD FOR HAZARD ZONING IN POPULATED AREAS , 2008 .

[13]  Robin Fell,et al.  A framework for landslide risk assessment and management , 2005 .

[14]  Vincent Labiouse,et al.  Considerations on Swiss methodologies for rock fall hazard mapping based on trajectory modelling , 2009 .

[15]  O. Hungr,et al.  Landslide Risk Management , 2005 .

[16]  Edmund Krauter,et al.  Rock Fall Simulation - A State of The Art Tool for Risk Assessment and Dimensioning of Rockfall Barriers , 2001 .

[17]  C. Derek Martin,et al.  RockFall analyst: A GIS extension for three-dimensional and spatially distributed rockfall hazard modeling , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  John A. Hudson,et al.  A comprehensive method of rock mass characterization for indicating natural slope instability , 1996, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[19]  W. Z. Savage,et al.  Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning , 2008 .

[20]  Herbert H. Einstein,et al.  Rock slopes from mechanics to decision making , 2010 .

[21]  Didier Hantz,et al.  Quantitative assessment of diffuse rock fall hazard along a cliff foot , 2011 .