Integrating approaches to relevance

[1]  S. Mizzaro.  Measuring the Agreement Among Relevance Judges , 1999, MIRA.

[2]  Ellen M. Voorhees.  Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Micheline Hancock-Beaulieu,et al.  Interactive searching and interface issues in the Okapi best match probabilistic retrieval system , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[4]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation , 1968, Inf. Storage Retr..

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[7]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  The influence of relevance levels on the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[9]  Carol L. Barry,et al.  Order Effects: A Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance. , 1988 .

[10]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Abduction, explanation and relevance feedback , 1999 .

[11]  Marius Tico,et al.  A Test Collection for the Evaluation of Content-Based Image Retrieval Algorithms—A User and Task-Based Approach , 2001, Information Retrieval.

[12]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged on users' judgments of relevance , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multiple Search Sessions Model of End-User Behavior: An Exploratory Study , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Ellen M. Voorhees,et al.  Evaluation by highly relevant documents , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[15]  Jonathan L. Herlocker,et al.  Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems , 2004, TOIS.

[16]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[17]  Amanda Spink.  Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval , 1997 .

[18]  R. V. Katter.  The influence of scale form on relevance judgments , 1968, Inf. Storage Retr..

[19]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Howard Greisdorf,et al.  Relevance thresholds: a multi-stage predictive model of how users evaluate information , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  David Bawden,et al.  Review: Information science, integration in perspective , 1997 .

[22]  IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg,et al.  Incremental relevance feedback , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[23]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  Liberal relevance criteria of TREC -: counting on negligible documents? , 2002, SIGIR '02.

[24]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information processing in the context of medical care , 1995, SIGIR '95.

[25]  Mary Elizabeth Stevens,et al.  Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation. , 1967 .

[26]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Ranking expansion terms using partial and ostensive evidence , 2002 .

[27]  Iain Campbell,et al.  Interactive Evaluation of the Ostensive Model Using a New Test Collection of Images with Multiple Relevance Assessments , 2000, Information Retrieval.

[28]  Isola Ajiferuke,et al.  A total relevance and document interaction effects model for the evaluation of information retrieval processes , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[29]  Amanda Spink,et al.  From Highly Relevant to Not Relevant: Examining Different Regions of Relevance , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Jane Reid,et al.  A Task-Oriented Non-Interactive Evaluation Methodology for Information Retrieval Systems , 2000, Information Retrieval.

[31]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  How users assess Web pages for information seeking , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  DICHOTOMOUS RELEVANCE JUDGMENTS AND THE EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS. , 1987 .

[33]  Gabriella Kazai,et al.  The overlap problem in content-oriented XML retrieval evaluation , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[34]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Stefano Mizzaro.  Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .

[36]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  User's perception of relevance of spoken documents , 2000 .

[37]  Joseph Janes.  The Binary Nature of Continuous Relevance Judgments: A Study of Users' Perceptions. , 1991 .

[38]  Carol L. Barry,et al.  Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[39]  Andrew Turpin,et al.  Why batch and user evaluations do not give the same results , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[40]  Edie M. Rasmussen,et al.  Users' relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[41]  Stephen P. Harter.  Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 1996 .

[42]  Gabriella Kazai,et al.  Tolerance to irrelevance: a user-effort oriented evaluation of retrieval systems without predefined retrieval unit , 2004 .

[43]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: A longitudinal case study , 2000, RIAO.