Data-Driven Approach to Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Learning Algorithms

Condition assessment and prediction of existing infrastructure systems is a major objective in civil engineering. Structural health monitoring (SHM) achieves this goal by continuous data acquisition from an array of sensors deployed on the structure of interest. SHM constructs ubiquitous damage features from the acquired data, ensuring maximum sensitivity to the onset of damage and robustness to noise and variability in environmental and operational conditions. Traditionally, SHM has used a model-based approach, wherein a high-fidelity model of a structure is constructed and studied in detail to aid engineers in detecting the onset of damage based on deviations from an undamaged model of the system. However, given the complexity of structures and the inability to perfectly model all aspects of a system, a data-driven approach becomes an attractive alternative. In data-driven approaches, a surrogate model, constructed using acquired data from a system, is substituted for a real model. Although such models do not necessarily capture all the physics of a system, they are efficient for damage detection purposes. Statistical learning algorithms aid in the construction of such surrogate models, and their use has now been extensively documented in the literature. This chapter provides a brief review of applications of statistical learning algorithms, both supervised and unsupervised, in SHM for real-time condition assessment of civil infrastructure systems.

[1]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[2]  Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos,et al.  Structural damage detection and classification based on machine learning algorithms , 2016 .

[3]  D. Nix,et al.  Damage Identification with Linear Discriminant Operators , 1999 .

[4]  V. Sugumaran,et al.  A comparative study of Naïve Bayes classifier and Bayes net classifier for fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using wavelet analysis , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Haoxiang He,et al.  Structural damage detection with wavelet support vector machine: introduction and applications , 2007 .

[6]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Electro-Mechanical Impedance-Based Wireless Structural Health Monitoring Using PCA-Data Compression and k-means Clustering Algorithms , 2008 .

[7]  Charles R Farrar,et al.  Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases , 2005 .

[9]  Keith Worden,et al.  Damage identification using support vector machines , 2001 .

[10]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .

[11]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Blind identification of damage in time-varying systems using independent component analysis with wavelet transform , 2014 .

[12]  Mohamed Othman,et al.  A Naïve-Bayes classifier for damage detection in engineering materials , 2007 .

[13]  Mehmet Imregun,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MEASURED FRF DATA REDUCED VIA PRINCIPAL COMPONENT PROJECTION , 2001 .

[14]  Ambuj K. Singh,et al.  Real-time nondestructive structural health monitoring using support vector machines and wavelets , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[15]  Gyuhae Park,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring With Autoregressive Support Vector Machines , 2009 .

[16]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Damage Detection in Steel Pipes Using a Semi-Supervised Statistical Learning Algorithm , 2016 .

[17]  C. D. Zhang,et al.  Comparative studies on damage identification with Tikhonov regularization and sparse regularization , 2016 .

[18]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Structural damage detection by fuzzy clustering , 2008 .

[19]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Damage diagnosis using a kernel-based method , 2007 .

[21]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Damage classification in structural health monitoring using principal component analysis and self‐organizing maps , 2013 .

[22]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[23]  Christophe Letot,et al.  Early detection of bearing damage by means of decision trees , 2008 .

[24]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Output-only modal identification with limited sensors using sparse component analysis , 2013 .

[25]  Gábor Lugosi,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Learning Theory , 2004, Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning.

[26]  K. Krishnan Nair,et al.  Time Series Based Structural Damage Detection Algorithm Using Gaussian Mixtures , 2007 .

[27]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  Structural Damage Detection using Independent Component Analysis , 2004 .

[28]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[29]  K. Worden,et al.  The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Yuchen Pan Linear Regression Based Damage Detection Algorithm Using Data from a Densely Clustered Sensing System , 2012 .

[31]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Modeling and harnessing sparse and low‐rank data structure: a new paradigm for structural dynamics, identification, damage detection, and health monitoring , 2017 .

[32]  Shamim N. Pakzad,et al.  Structural damage detection and localisation using multivariate regression models and two-sample control statistics , 2015 .

[33]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Damage detection of structures using support vector machines under various boundary conditions , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[34]  Srinivasan Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Modeling Aspects in Finite Elements , 2009 .

[35]  Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos,et al.  Principal component analysis vs. independent component analysis for damage detection , 2013 .

[36]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[37]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification , 2014 .

[38]  R. J. Barthorpe,et al.  On model- and data-based approaches to structural health monitoring , 2010 .