Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The implant makes it possible to replace a missing tooth in a very esthetic way with a very comfortable result because the tooth is fixed and independent of its neighbors, like a natural tooth. Titanium alloy grade 5 or Ti-6AI-4V, has excellent properties mechanical and an interesting modulus of elasticity. It is known to be biocompatible and remains the material of choice for the medical sector: orthopedic, dental implants and maxillofacial surgery. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence on the biomechanical behavior of dental implants with a variable velocity at the implant/bone contact area and to compare the differences EQV stress between spherical and conical impactor. METHODS We chose a dental implant located in the lower jaw, in the region of the second premolar. The assembly consists of six parts: Feldsphatic porcelain crown, cobalt-chrome alloy framework, titanium alloy implant abutment and the jaw is composed of cancellous bone and cortical bone. The width and height of cortical bone model were 15.8 mm and 23.5 mm, respectively. The thickness of its upper part was 2 mm. The implant and its components were modeled using SolidWorks 2016 software and then exported to Abaqus program 6.13 using the finite element method. The geometry of the solid implant is presented in form of cylinder screw of length 8 mm and diameter 4.8 mm. The sizes of the abutment are: length l = 7.2 mm, lower diameter d1= 2.6 mm and great diameter d2 = 3.6 mm. RESULTS Maximum von Mises stress generated by spherical impactor are lower than those obtained by conical impactor. For big velocity of the impactor, the stresses may be critical since the mechanical properties of the implant material and the cortical and cancellous bone could not withstand stress magnitudes recorded in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS A conical projectile leads to an equivalent stress greater than that generated by a spherical projectile. Whatever the projectile shape, the stress intensity increases in the different components of the dental prosthesis with increasing the impact velocity.

[1]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants. , 2011, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  Peter Ngan,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  G. Katti,et al.  Evaluation of design parameters of eight dental implant designs: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2012, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[4]  Atilim Eser,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: A 3-D FEM study , 2012, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  P H Jacobsen,et al.  Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[6]  C. Hammerle,et al.  The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses. , 2007, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[7]  N. Djebbar,et al.  Numerical Analysis of the Shock Efforts on the Stress Level in the Dental Prosthesis Elements , 2018 .

[8]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry , 1985 .

[9]  Qing Li,et al.  Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[11]  N. Djebbar,et al.  The Effect of the Projectile Shape on the Stress Biomechanical Behavior of Dental Implant: Three-dimensional Analysis , 2019 .

[12]  F. Kloss,et al.  Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration , 2016, BioMed research international.

[13]  Heng-Li Huang,et al.  Relationship of three-dimensional bone-to-implant contact to primary implant stability and peri-implant bone strain in immediate loading: microcomputed tomographic and in vitro analyses. , 2013, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  Jui-Ting Hsu,et al.  Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  J. H. Rubo,et al.  Stress Distribution in Single Dental Implant System: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Based on an In Vitro Experimental Model , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  Dong-Won Lee,et al.  Effect of thread size on the implant neck area: preliminary results at 1 year of function. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  Fehmi Erzincanlı,et al.  Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[18]  Sinan Müftü,et al.  Load transfer along the bone-dental implant interface. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  François Bermond,et al.  Human face response at an angle to the fore-aft vertical plane impact , 1999 .

[20]  Feng Deng,et al.  Difference of natural teeth and implant-supported restoration: A comparison of bone remodeling simulations , 2015 .

[21]  Cyrus Ahmadi Toussi,et al.  Effect of using different metal and ceramic materials as restorations on stress distribution around dental implants: a comparative finite element study , 2018, Materials Research Express.

[22]  M Sesha Reddy,et al.  Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review , 2019, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[23]  M. Ash,et al.  Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion , 1992 .

[25]  S. Hansson,et al.  The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  F. Lobbezoo,et al.  Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[27]  Chun-Li Lin,et al.  Multi-factorial analysis of variables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  I N Aparna,et al.  Implant crest module: a review of biomechanical considerations. , 2012, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[29]  K. Akca,et al.  Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[30]  N. Wakabayashi,et al.  Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  B. Serier,et al.  Stress distribution in dental implant with elastomeric stress barrier , 2011 .

[32]  Matthias Karl,et al.  Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[33]  H. Van Oosterwyck,et al.  Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[34]  H. Talebi,et al.  Developing a New Dental Implant Design and Comparing its Biomechanical Features with Four Designs , 2010, Dental research journal.

[35]  Oğuz Eraslan,et al.  The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[36]  A. A. Del Bel Cury,et al.  Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign. , 2017, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[37]  C. Goodacre,et al.  Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.