Vrije Universiteit Brussel Noninvasive Imaging of the Immune Checkpoint LAG-3 Using Nanobodies, from Development to Pre-Clinical Use Lecocq,

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is a promising cancer therapy, which has progressed rapidly from a preclinical concept to clinical implementation. Commonly considered targets in ICI are CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, and LAG-3, and the list grows. As ICI is generally only beneficial for a subset of patients, there is a need to select patients that are eligible for therapy as well as to monitor therapy response. There is growing interest to do this noninvasively, by molecular imaging with target-specific tracers. To this day, noninvasive imaging has focused on CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, while there is no noninvasive tool available to accurately assess LAG-3 expression in vivo. In this proof-of-concept study, we developed nanobodies, the smallest functional fragments from camelid heavy chain-only antibodies, to noninvasively evaluate mouse LAG-3 expression using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging. The in vitro characterization of 114 nanobodies led to the selection of nine nanobodies binding to mouse LAG3. The injection of 99mTechnetium-labeled nanobodies in healthy mice showed specific uptake in immune peripheral organs like the spleen and lymph nodes, which was not observed in LAG-3 gene knock-out mice. Moreover, nanobody uptake could be visualized using SPECT/CT and correlated to the presence of LAG-3 as assessed in flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. SPECT/CT scans of tumor bearing mice further confirmed the diagnostic potential of the nanobodies. These findings substantiate the approach to use nanobodies as a tool to image inhibitory immune checkpoints in the tumor environment.

[1]  N. Devoogdt,et al.  Theranostics in immuno-oncology using nanobody derivatives , 2019, Theranostics.

[2]  A. Murphy,et al.  Preclinical Development of the Anti-LAG-3 Antibody REGN3767: Characterization and Activity in Combination with the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Cemiplimab in Human PD-1xLAG-3–Knockin Mice , 2019, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[3]  N. Villa‐Ruano,et al.  LAG-3 antagonists by cancer treatment: a patent review , 2019, Expert opinion on therapeutic patents.

[4]  G. Kochan,et al.  Functional systemic CD4 immunity is required for clinical responses to PD‐L1/PD‐1 blockade therapy , 2019, EMBO molecular medicine.

[5]  Q. Pu,et al.  Characterization of a novel anti-human lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) antibody for cancer immunotherapy , 2019, mAbs.

[6]  N. Devoogdt,et al.  Evaluating a Single Domain Antibody Targeting Human PD-L1 as a Nuclear Imaging and Therapeutic Agent , 2019, Cancers.

[7]  R. Herbst,et al.  Expression Analysis and Significance of PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3 in Human Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Spatially Resolved and Multiparametric Single-Cell Analysis , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  N. Devoogdt,et al.  Targeted Nanobody-Based Molecular Tracers for Nuclear Imaging and Image-Guided Surgery , 2019, Antibodies.

[9]  G. Zhu,et al.  Fibrinogen-like Protein 1 Is a Major Immune Inhibitory Ligand of LAG-3 , 2019, Cell.

[10]  Jie Tian,et al.  Advances in molecular imaging of immune checkpoint targets in malignancies: current and future prospect , 2018, European Radiology.

[11]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer , 2018, Nature Communications.

[12]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[14]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled dimeric sdAbs constructs targeting human CD20. , 2018, New biotechnology.

[15]  J. Allison,et al.  Fundamental Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy. , 2018, Cancer discovery.

[16]  Y. De Vlaeminck,et al.  Turn Back the TIMe: Targeting Tumor Infiltrating Myeloid Cells to Revert Cancer Progression , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[17]  N. Devoogdt,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of the PD-1:PD-L1 immune checkpoint: Embracing nuclear medicine for the benefit of personalized immunotherapy , 2018, Theranostics.

[18]  Lestat R. Ali,et al.  Anti–CTLA-4 therapy requires an Fc domain for efficacy , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Dan Li,et al.  Immuno-PET Imaging of 89Zr Labeled Anti-PD-L1 Domain Antibody. , 2018, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[20]  K. Bloom,et al.  Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Testing: A Review of Analytical Assays and Clinical Implementation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Initial efficacy of anti-lymphocyte activation gene-3 (anti–LAG-3; BMS-986016) in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in pts with melanoma (MEL) previously treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. , 2017 .

[22]  Marleen Keyaerts,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of murine PD-L1 levels in syngeneic tumor models by nuclear imaging with nanobody tracers , 2017, Oncotarget.

[23]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Lymphocyte‐activation gene‐3, an important immune checkpoint in cancer , 2016, Cancer science.

[24]  Ana C Anderson,et al.  Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: Co-inhibitory Receptors with Specialized Functions in Immune Regulation. , 2016, Immunity.

[25]  C. Vanhove,et al.  Phase I Study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Classifying Cancers Based on T-cell Infiltration and PD-L1. , 2015, Cancer research.

[27]  E. Jaffee,et al.  Galectin-3 Shapes Antitumor Immune Responses by Suppressing CD8+ T Cells via LAG-3 and Inhibiting Expansion of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells , 2015, Cancer Immunology Research.

[28]  Zhiyuan Hu,et al.  LSECtin expressed on melanoma cells promotes tumor progression by inhibiting antitumor T-cell responses. , 2014, Cancer research.

[29]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  Imaging and radioimmunotherapy of multiple myeloma with anti-idiotypic Nanobodies , 2014, Leukemia.

[30]  David C. Smith,et al.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Jakub Toczek,et al.  Nanobodies Targeting Mouse/Human VCAM1 for the Nuclear Imaging of Atherosclerotic Lesions , 2012, Circulation research.

[32]  Nick Devoogdt,et al.  Preclinical screening of anti‐HER2 nanobodies for molecular imaging of breast cancer , 2011, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[33]  D. Getnet,et al.  LAG-3 regulates CD8+ T cell accumulation and effector function in murine self- and tumor-tolerance systems. , 2007, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  J. Aerts,et al.  Lentiviral vectors for cancer immunotherapy: transforming infectious particles into therapeutics , 2007, Gene Therapy.

[35]  M. Dullaers,et al.  Lentivirally transduced dendritic cells as a tool for cancer immunotherapy , 2003, The journal of gene medicine.

[36]  A. Trickett,et al.  T cell stimulation and expansion using anti-CD3/CD28 beads. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[37]  Lingzhou Zhao,et al.  Early phase I study of a 99m Tc labeled anti-PD-L1 single domain antibody in SPECT/CT assessment of programmed death ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer , 2019 .

[38]  E. Lipson,et al.  Lymphocyte Activation Gene 3 (LAG-3) , 2017 .

[39]  He Huang,et al.  Expression of single-domain antibody in different systems , 2017, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[40]  N. Devoogdt,et al.  Site-specific labeling of his-tagged Nanobodies with ⁹⁹mTc: a practical guide. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.