Environmental and economic multi-objective optimization of comprehensive energy industry: A case study

Abstract Coal will continue to dominate the energy structure for a long time, however, the severe environmental issues require that coal should be cleanly and efficiently utilized. This work proposes to carry out integrated research on the optimization model of the coal and new energy-based industrial structure at the enterprise level. To meet the low-carbon requirements, a multi-objective superstructure optimization model of the coal and new energy-based energy structure under a variety of constraints is constructed, while the carbon emissions and total profits are selected as the objectives simultaneously. Then a case study is conducted with the industrial structure of a representative energy company as the study object. Via self-developed mixed programming to achieve the optimal solution of Pareto-frontier, this study analyzed the energy industry adjustment and layout optimization under three different scenarios. The turning point with the emission reduction rate of 2 % is recommended as the optimal choice under the baseline scenario, and new energy power generation has become a new growth point of the group's profits after adjusting the investment structure. Comparisons between the coal and new energy power generation prices will seriously affect the optimization and prediction results of the low-carbon scenario. The annual profit in 2020 will decrease significantly under the epidemic situation, but the change rules of emissions and profits are basically consistent with the baseline scenario. The research methods and quantitative results could be generalized for relevant comprehensive energy companies to adjust their strategic layout and make plans.

[1]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management - A case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran , 2017 .

[2]  Graham Ault,et al.  Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the state-of-the-art , 2010 .

[3]  Yong Hao,et al.  A solar thermochemical fuel production system integrated with fossil fuel heat recuperation , 2016 .

[4]  Taher Niknam,et al.  A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow , 2011 .

[5]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  Predicting and optimization of energy consumption using system dynamics-fuzzy multiple objective programming in world heritage areas , 2013 .

[6]  Hongbo Ren,et al.  A MILP model for integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems , 2010 .

[7]  K. Chau,et al.  Energy-Life cycle assessment on applying solar technologies for greenhouse strawberry production , 2019 .

[8]  K. Chau,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm , 2021 .

[9]  Jiankun He,et al.  China's INDC and non-fossil energy development , 2015 .

[10]  Hongsheng Wang,et al.  Feasibility of high efficient solar hydrogen generation system integrating photovoltaic cell/photon-enhanced thermionic emission and high-temperature electrolysis cell , 2020 .

[11]  K. Chau,et al.  Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks , 2021 .

[12]  P. Laha,et al.  Low carbon electricity system for India in 2030 based on multi-objective multi-criteria assessment , 2021 .

[13]  S. Evans,et al.  Employment impacts of renewable energy policies in China: A decomposition analysis based on a CGE modeling framework , 2018 .

[14]  Yongming Han,et al.  Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving , 2017 .

[15]  Alban Kuriqi,et al.  Optimisation of cascade reservoir operation considering environmental flows for different environmental management classes , 2020 .

[16]  Hongguang Jin,et al.  Isothermal versus two-temperature solar thermochemical fuel synthesis: A comparative study , 2018, Applied Energy.

[17]  Hongsheng Wang,et al.  A strategy for optimizing efficiencies of solar thermochemical fuel production based on nonstoichiometric oxides , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[18]  Hongsheng Wang,et al.  Perspective of CIGS-BIPV’s Product Competitiveness in China , 2020 .

[19]  Hui Kong,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a solar thermochemical cycle-based direct coal liquefaction system for oil production , 2019, Energy.

[20]  Xu Liu,et al.  A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030 , 2019, Applied Energy.

[21]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[22]  Tianzhu Zhang,et al.  Multi-objective modeling and optimization for cleaner production processes , 2006 .

[23]  A. Motevali,et al.  Exergoenvironmental-Life cycle cost analysis for conventional, low external input and organic systems of rice paddy production , 2020 .

[24]  António N. Pinheiro,et al.  Water-energy-ecosystem nexus: Balancing competing interests at a run-of-river hydropower plant coupling a hydrologic–ecohydraulic approach , 2020 .

[25]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Automatic synthesis of optimum heat exchanger network configurations , 1986 .