Measurement and comparison of diffuse solar irradiance models on inclined surfaces in Valladolid (Spain)

Abstract This paper presents the performance of 10 arithmetic models used to estimate diffuse solar irradiance on inclined surfaces in a comparative study with actual data readings made available on an hourly and a daily basis. The data readings have been taken from a south facing surface inclined at 42° in an area at some distance from the provincial capital in the Spanish province of Valladolid. In order to confirm the results, three statistical parameters have been used in the study; root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE) and Stone’s t -statistic. The results obtained favour the Muneer model, followed by the Reindl model, for hourly as well as for daily values. The Temps–Coulson model gives rise to great discrepancies with respect to the values measured. The results for the Perez model are not good due to the use of parameters that are not specifically calculated for the area in this study, which underlines the need to take an area’s features into account so that predictions for diffuse irradiance measured on inclined surfaces may be as accurate as possible.

[1]  J. Michalsky,et al.  A simple procedure for correcting shadowband data for all sky conditions , 1990 .

[2]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  On shadowband correction methods for diffuse irradiance measurements , 1995 .

[3]  J. Bugler.  The determination of hourly insolation on an inclined plane using a diffuse irradiance model based on hourly measured global horizontal insolation , 1977 .

[4]  C. Gueymard.  An anisotropic solar irradiance model for tilted surfaces and its comparison with selected engineering algorithms , 1987 .

[5]  J. Hay.  Calculation of monthly mean solar radiation for horizontal and inclined surfaces , 1979 .

[6]  William A. Peterson,et al.  Corrections for diffuse irradiance measured with shadowbands , 1980 .

[7]  T. M. Klucher.  Evaluation of models to predict insolation on tilted surfaces , 1978 .

[8]  B. E. Psiloglou,et al.  Comparison between measurements and models for daily solar irradiation on tilted surfaces in Athens, Greece , 1997 .

[9]  Tariq Muneer,et al.  Solar radiation model for Europe , 1990 .

[10]  MODELING IRRADIANCE ON TILTED PLANES: A SIMPLER VERSION OF THE PEREZ MODEL; US-WIDE CLIMATIC/ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION , 1988 .

[11]  R. Seals,et al.  The development and verification of the Perez diffuse radiation model , 1988 .

[12]  P. Ineichen,et al.  A new simplified version of the perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces , 1987 .

[13]  R. J. Stone.  Improved statistical procedure for the evaluation of solar radiation estimation models , 1993 .

[14]  Richard Perez,et al.  An anisotropic hourly diffuse radiation model for sloping surfaces: Description, performance validation, site dependency evaluation , 1986 .

[15]  Cort J. Willmott,et al.  On the climatic optimization of the tilt and azimuth of flat-plate solar collectors , 1982 .

[16]  Inge Dirmhirn,et al.  Strengths and limitations of the Liu and Jordan model to determine diffuse from global irradiance , 1983 .

[17]  Ralph C. Temps,et al.  Solar radiation incident upon slopes of different orientations , 1977 .

[18]  W. Beckman,et al.  Evaluation of hourly tilted surface radiation models , 1990 .

[19]  M. Iqbal.  An introduction to solar radiation , 1983 .

[20]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance , 1990 .

[21]  C. Gueymard.  Mathermatically integrable parameterization of clear-sky beam and global irradiances and its use in daily irradiation applications , 1993 .

[22]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  The long-term average performance of flat-plate solar-energy collectors , 1963 .

[23]  B. Psiloglou,et al.  Measurements and models for total solar irradiance on inclined surface in Athens, Greece , 1994 .

[24]  W. Beckman,et al.  Diffuse fraction correlations , 1990 .