Lack of effectiveness of cellulose sulfate gel for the prevention of vaginal HIV transmission.

BACKGROUND Women make up more than 50% of adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, female-initiated HIV prevention methods are urgently needed. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cellulose sulfate, an HIV-entry inhibitor formulated as a vaginal gel, involving women at high risk for HIV infection at three African and two Indian sites. The primary end point was newly acquired infection with HIV type 1 or 2. The secondary end point was newly acquired gonococcal or chlamydial infection. The primary analysis was based on a log-rank test of no difference in the distribution of time to HIV infection, stratified according to site. RESULTS A total of 1398 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive cellulose sulfate gel (706 participants) or placebo (692 participants) and had follow-up HIV test data. There were 41 newly acquired HIV infections, 25 in the cellulose sulfate group and 16 in the placebo group, with an estimated hazard ratio of infection for the cellulose sulfate group of 1.61 (P=0.13). This result, which is not significant, is in contrast to the interim finding that led to the trial being stopped prematurely (hazard ratio, 2.02 [corrected]; P=0.05 [corrected]) and the suggestive result of a preplanned secondary (adherence-based) analysis (hazard ratio, 2.02; P=0.05). No significant effect of cellulose sulfate as compared with placebo was found on the risk of gonorrheal infection (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.62) or chlamydial infection (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.08). CONCLUSIONS Cellulose sulfate did not prevent HIV infection and may have increased the risk of HIV acquisition. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153777; and Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN95638385.)

[1]  C. Mauck,et al.  Noncomparative Contraceptive Efficacy of Cellulose Sulfate Gel , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  N. Jewell,et al.  Diaphragm and lubricant gel for prevention of HIV acquisition in southern African women: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[3]  L. van Damme,et al.  Expanded Phase I safety and acceptability study of 6% cellulose sulfate vaginal gel , 2005, AIDS.

[4]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[5]  G. Doncel,et al.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of a potential universal placebo designed for use in vaginal microbicide clinical trials. , 2005, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[6]  G. Vanham,et al.  Carbohydrate-Binding Agents Efficiently Prevent Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-3-Grabbing Nonintegrin (DC-SIGN)-Directed HIV-1 Transmission to T Lymphocytes , 2007, Molecular Pharmacology.

[7]  Z. Rosenberg,et al.  Microbicides urgently needed: statement by IPM CEO, Zeda Rosenberg, on new AIDS statistics. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) releases the 2004 AIDS epidemic update. , 2004 .

[8]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[9]  A. Neurath,et al.  Role of seminal plasma in the anti-HIV-1 activity of candidate microbicides , 2006, BMC infectious diseases.

[10]  D. Weiner,et al.  Single and multiple exposure tolerance study of polystyrene sulfonate gel: a phase I safety and colposcopy study. , 2001, Contraception.

[11]  C. Mauck,et al.  Safety and acceptability of 6% cellulose sulfate vaginal gel applied four times per day for 14 days. , 2007, Contraception.

[12]  J. Stockman Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial , 2008 .

[13]  B. Thiers Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial , 2008 .

[14]  C. Mauck,et al.  Cellulose sulfate: tolerance and acceptability of penile application. , 2001, Contraception.

[15]  D. Weiner,et al.  Fourteen-day safety and acceptability study of 6% cellulose sulfate gel: a randomized double-blind Phase I safety study. , 2006, Contraception.

[16]  Louise Knight,et al.  Effect of herpes simplex suppression on incidence of HIV among women in Tanzania. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Steinbrook One step forward, two steps back--will there ever be an AIDS vaccine? , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Justman,et al.  Safety and acceptability of cellulose sulfate as a vaginal microbicide in HIV-infected women , 2006, AIDS.

[19]  D. Weiner,et al.  Single and multiple exposure tolerance study of cellulose sulfate gel: a Phase I safety and colposcopy study. , 2001, Contraception.

[20]  Emmanuel Lagarde,et al.  Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trial of Male Circumcision for Reduction of HIV Infection Risk: The ANRS 1265 Trial , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[21]  L. van Damme,et al.  Safety Trial of the Vaginal Microbicide Cellulose Sulfate Gel in HIV-Positive Men , 2007, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[22]  S. Lagakos,et al.  Methodological challenges in biomedical HIV prevention trials. , 2008 .

[23]  J. Ndinya-Achola Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, Williams CF, Campbell RT, Ndinya-Achola JO.Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2007 Feb 24;369(9562):643-56. , 2007 .