The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.

OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) on the quality of life (QOL) of adults and to test the hypothesis that a BAHA improves QOL because otorrhea and/or skin irritations decrease. DESIGN Prospective postal-based questionnaire study using validated health-related QOL instruments, combined with hearing-aid-related questions. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study included 56 consecutive adult patients with acquired conductive or mixed hearing loss who were scheduled for BAHA implantation at the University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. All 56 patients completed the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and the Hearing Handicap and Disability Inventory (HHDI); 36 patients had been using an air-conduction hearing aid (ACHA) and 20 patients a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid (CBHA). Questionnaires were filled out before surgery and after 6 months of experience with the BAHA. RESULTS In the SF-36 group, there was significant improvement in the scores of the mental health domain (P =.02). When the SF-36 patients were classified according to previous hearing aid, there was no statistically significant change in the scores in any of the domains. In the EQ-5D group and in its ACHA and CBHA subgroups, there were no important differences in the results before and after the patients received their BAHAs. In the HHDI group, the handicap and disability scales showed significant improvement (P<.01) irrespective of the type of previously worn hearing aid. CONCLUSIONS Overall, generic health-related QOL was not influenced significantly by the use of a BAHA according to the SF-36 and the EQ-5D. The more disease-specific scales (HHDI) did show improved QOL with a BAHA.

[1]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Patients' attitudes to the bone-anchored hearing aid. Results of a questionnaire study. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  J. Charnley Long-Term Clinical Results , 1979 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  D. Proops,et al.  The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results , 1996, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[5]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy , 1996, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  D. Brunenberg,et al.  Societal effects of hearing aid fitting among the moderately hearing impaired: Efectos sociales de la adaptación de auxiliares auditivos en pacientes con impedimentos auditivos moderados , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[7]  J. Ware,et al.  International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project , 1992, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  A. Snik,et al.  Patients' opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids. , 1995, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[9]  N K Aaronson,et al.  An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. , 1997, Medical care.

[10]  A. Snik,et al.  Intraindividual comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid and air-conduction hearing aids. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[11]  J. Kelly,et al.  Clinical results with a percutaneous bone‐anchored hearing aid , 1989, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  H. Francis,et al.  Impact of Cochlear Implants on the Functional Health Status of Older Adults , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  Paul Kind,et al.  Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey , 1998, BMJ.

[14]  G. Salomon,et al.  Age-related hearing difficulties. I. Hearing impairment, disability, and handicap--a controlled study. , 1988, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[15]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[16]  P. Bonding,et al.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Osseointegration and audiological effect. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[17]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[18]  A. Reid,et al.  The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues. , 2002, The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement.

[19]  B. Weinstein,et al.  The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[20]  M. Abdalla,et al.  The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? , 1993, BMJ.

[21]  R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[22]  S. Gatehouse,et al.  Estimation of the Benefit of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids , 1994, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[23]  Peder Carlsson,et al.  Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[24]  A Tjellström,et al.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[25]  D. Meikle,et al.  Bone‐Anchored Hearing Aid Quality of Life Assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[26]  Bob W. Gayler,et al.  Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. , 1990 .

[27]  R. V. D. van den Brink,et al.  Attitude and help-seeking for hearing impairment. , 1996, British journal of audiology.

[28]  P U Carlsson,et al.  The Bone‐Anchored Hearing Aid: Reference Quantities and Functional Gain , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[29]  I. M. Ventry,et al.  Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[30]  F. Bess The Role of Generic Health‐Related Quality of Life Measures in Establishing Audiological Rehabilitation Outcomes , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[31]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[32]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[33]  D. Proops The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: surgical methods and complications , 1996, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.