Digital divide in ASEAN member states: analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs

PurposeThis study addresses the critical factors that contribute to the success of e-government programs in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states (AMS). We investigate the factors that play key roles in e-government adoption and implementation in AMS that stem from multiple dimensions.Design/methodology/approachOur qualitative study on eight ASEAN countries with different political situations and economic developments suggests that in general, institutions (formal and informal institutions), resources, leadership, organizational design and culture values determine the success of e-government.FindingsThe provision of adequate information and communication technology infrastructure alone is insufficient to ensure the success of e-government.Research limitations/implicationsOur findings lead to a conceptual framework of factors that drive the success of e-government projects that advances the literature on e-government, particularly the research about e-government in the context of developing countries.Originality/valueAn empirical evidence and in-depth understanding suggest that different factors are associated with detrimental impacts on e-government implementation.

[1]  R. Gómez,et al.  ICT Evaluation: Are We Asking the Right Questions? , 2012 .

[2]  Dawit Demissie,et al.  An analysis of African e-Government service websites , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Valentina Ndou,et al.  E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[5]  Bradley E. Wright,et al.  Pulling the Levers: Transformational Leadership, Public Service Motivation, and Mission Valence , 2012 .

[6]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Lloyd George Waller,et al.  Barriers to transforming government in Jamaica , 2015 .

[8]  Ping Gao,et al.  Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study , 2017, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[9]  Z. Bian,et al.  Quantifying the emission’s impact of coal mining activities on the environment and human health in process , 2013 .

[10]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[11]  M. Jae Moon,et al.  The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and e-Government Studies in Public Administration , 2014 .

[12]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Silvia Bolgherini,et al.  The Technology Trap and the Role of Political and Cultural Variables: A Critical Analysis of the E-Government Policies , 2007 .

[15]  Tino Schuppan,et al.  E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Hussein Al-Yaseen,et al.  Evaluation of Awareness and Acceptability of Using e-Government Services in Developing Countries : the Case of Jordan , 2010 .

[17]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[18]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  E-government evaluation: Citizen's perspective in developing countries , 2009 .

[19]  Adam Fadlalla,et al.  A context-based integrative framework for e-government initiatives , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Miriam Lips,et al.  Information-Intensive Government and the Layering and Sorting of Citizenship , 2007 .

[21]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  The Dysfunctions of Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in the Meta-governance of Partnership , 2007 .

[22]  Meng Xu,et al.  Investigating the Determinants of Decision-Making on Adoption of Public Cloud Computing in E-government , 2016, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[23]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Wonhyuk Cho,et al.  E-government 4.0 in Thailand: The role of central agencies , 2018, Inf. Polity.

[25]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Managerial Innovation: Conceptions, Processes and Antecedents , 2012, Management and Organization Review.

[26]  Janja Nograsek,et al.  Change Management as a Critical Success Factor in e-Government Implementation , 2011 .

[27]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Diffusion of e-government: A literature review and directions for future directions , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Hal Hill,et al.  Does East Asia Have a Working Financial Safety Net , 2014 .

[29]  Bo Fan,et al.  The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  J. Gerring.  Case Study Research: Case Study Research , 2006 .

[31]  A. Manoharan,et al.  Conceptualizing E-Government from Local Government Perspectives , 2018 .

[32]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Implementing E-government in Lagos State: Understanding the impact of cultural perceptions and working practices , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  F. Zhao,et al.  e-Government Development and Government Effectiveness: A Reciprocal Relationship , 2018 .

[34]  Susan Meyers Chandler,et al.  Knowledge vacuum: An organizational learning dynamic of how e-government innovations fail , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  Aurélien Buffat.  Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government , 2015 .

[36]  Jeannine E. Relly,et al.  Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  Maddalena Sorrentino,et al.  Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of E-Government in peripheral areas? Evidence from Italy , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Calvin Zhou-Peng Liao,et al.  Proactive e-Governance: Flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan , 2015, Government Information Quarterly.

[40]  James Melitski,et al.  Capacity and E-Government Performance: An Analysis Based on Early Adopters of Internet Technologies in New Jersey , 2003 .

[41]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[42]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  e-Government readiness: Does national culture matter? , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  S. Goldfinch,et al.  Pessimism, Computer Failure, and Information Systems Development in the Public Sector , 2007 .

[44]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  Transforming local e-government services: the use of application service providers , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  A. Spink,et al.  Transformation of a health care information system: a self-assessment survey , 1999 .

[46]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  Sebastian Stier,et al.  Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: Comparing democracies and autocracies , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  Osman M. Karatepe,et al.  The effect of management commitment to service quality on employees’ affective and performance outcomes , 2003 .

[49]  Gregory A. Porumbescu,et al.  Engendering inclusive e-government use through citizen IT training programs , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  Alexander P. Pons,et al.  E-Government for Arab Countries , 2004 .

[51]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Challenges of interorganizational collaboration for information technology adoption: Insights from a governmental financial decision-making process in Egypt , 2009, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[52]  Jittima Wongwuttiwat,et al.  The digital Thailand strategy and the ASEAN community , 2018, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[53]  Bhaskar Chakrabarti,et al.  Making e-government work: Adopting the network approach , 2014, Government Information Quarterly.

[54]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[56]  Manuel Pérez Cota,et al.  From the quality of traditional services to the quality of local e-Government online services: A literature review , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Stakeholder theory for the E-government context: Framing a value-oriented normative core , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[58]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  Seung-Yong Rho,et al.  E-Government for Better Performance: Promises, Realities, and Challenges , 2007 .

[60]  Michael L. Best,et al.  Impact and Sustainability of E-Government Services in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from Tamil Nadu, India , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[61]  A. Lang,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Program Implementation: The Development of E-Relocation Notification in the Swiss Canton of Zurich , 2020, International Journal of Public Administration.

[62]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  A. Karch,et al.  Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research , 2007, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[64]  Fang Zhao,et al.  An Empirical Study of E-Government Service Adoption: Culture and Behavioral Intention , 2013 .

[65]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[66]  Keld Pedersen,et al.  Realizing e-government benefits with minimal capabilities , 2017 .

[67]  Fotis Kitsios,et al.  New service development in e‐government: identifying critical success factors , 2010 .

[68]  S. Kim,et al.  The Impact of Management Capacity on Government Innovation in Korea: An Empirical Study , 2009 .

[69]  Yudi Fernando,et al.  Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[70]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[71]  S. Dawes.  The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance , 2008 .

[72]  Myungsin Chae,et al.  Varying criticality of key success factors of national e-Strategy along the status of economic development of nations , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[73]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Exploring the role of a government authority in managing transformation in service re-engineering - Experiences from Dubai police , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[74]  Amy M. Hageman,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on Corruption in Transition Economies , 2017 .

[75]  Hyun Jung Yun,et al.  Building on Success: The Diffusion of e-Government in the American States , 2010 .

[76]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Determinants of computing in very small businesses , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[77]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States , 2008 .

[78]  Jack S. Levy,et al.  Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference , 2008 .

[79]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[80]  Mila Gascó,et al.  Exploring the E-Government Gap in South America , 2005 .

[81]  Tjerk Budding,et al.  Assessing electronic service delivery in municipalities: determinants and financial consequences of e-government implementation , 2018 .

[82]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Institutions and Economic Performance , 1993 .

[83]  Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk,et al.  The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[84]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation , 1990 .

[85]  Hossein Sharifi,et al.  An Adaptive Approach for Implementing e-Government in I. R. Iran , 2004 .

[86]  Steve Drew,et al.  The Impact of Trust on E-Government Services Acceptance: A Study of Users' Perceptions by Applying UTAUT Model , 2012, Int. J. Technol. Diffusion.

[87]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[88]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[89]  Subhajit Basu,et al.  E‐government and developing countries: an overview , 2004 .

[90]  Fang Zhao,et al.  E-government development and the digital economy: a reciprocal relationship , 2015, Internet Res..

[91]  David C. Yen,et al.  E-government: An analysis for implementation: Framework for understanding cultural and social impact , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[92]  Clay G. Wescott,et al.  E‐Government in the Asia‐pacific region , 2001 .

[93]  Jin Chen,et al.  E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[94]  Myeonggil Choi,et al.  Effects of innovation-supportive culture and organizational citizenship behavior on e-government information system security stemming from mimetic isomorphism , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[95]  Kurt Thurmaier,et al.  Advancing E‐Government: Financing Challenges and Opportunities , 2008 .

[96]  Jongsu Lee,et al.  E-government adoption in ASEAN: the case of Cambodia , 2009, Internet Res..

[97]  Prabin Kumar Panigrahi,et al.  Developing a roadmap for planning and implementation of interoperability capability in e-government , 2015 .

[98]  Jae Jeung Rho,et al.  Two-dimensional approach to governmental excellence for human development in developing countries: Combining policies and institutions with e-government , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[99]  Leonardo Lima Gomes,et al.  Government Supports in Public–Private Partnership Contracts: Metro Line 4 of the São Paulo Subway System , 2012 .

[100]  Maxat Kassen.  Promoting public cooperation in government: key drivers, regulation, and barriers of the e-collaboration movement in Kazakhstan , 2019 .