Prediction of the failure point settlement in rockfill dams based on spatial-temporal data and multiple-monitoring-point models

Abstract The integrity of monitoring data is important in the study of the deformation law of rockfill dams. Environment, construction, aging, and other factors result in dam monitoring sensors malfunction at the initial stage of operation. Data collection discontinue leads to insufficient monitoring data. The huge amount of missing data is lager than traditional model training samples and increases the difficulty of data recovery in failure points. In this study, the multiple-monitoring-point (MMP) model is established to extend the number of training set samples. MMP model integrates spatiotemporal information to make predictions of long-term missing data in malfunctioning settlement sensors according to the corresponding relationship among the coordinate position, environment values, and settlement. Additionally, this paper presents the study of monitoring point selection and the clustering time period division in the MMP model. The spatiotemporal data clustering analysis is used as the measurement method to determine the settlement similarity to screen the appropriate data. Experiments on large-scale real dam deformation data demonstrate that the MMP model is suitable for the long-term data prediction of failures in rockfill dam settlement monitoring. After the spatiotemporal panel data clustering analysis, the model prediction accuracy is significantly improved. This model provides a new method for dam settlement prediction and analysis.

[1]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  Real-time unified single- and multi-channel structural damage detection using recursive singular spectrum analysis , 2019 .

[3]  Juan Ren,et al.  Multivariable panel data ordinal clustering and its application in competitive strategy identification of appliance-wiring listed companies , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering.

[4]  Zhenxiang Jiang,et al.  Method of Fusion Diagnosis for Dam Service Status Based on Joint Distribution Function of Multiple Points , 2016 .

[5]  D. Hu,et al.  Dam Safety Analysis Based on Stepwise Regression Model , 2011 .

[6]  Nikola Milivojevic,et al.  Adaptive system for dam behavior modeling based on linear regression and genetic algorithms , 2013, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[7]  Hadi Salehi,et al.  Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[8]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Settlement analysis of the Shuibuya concrete-face rockfill dam , 2011 .

[9]  Luc Chouinard,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Monitoring Data for Concrete Arch Dams , 1995 .

[10]  Statistical Model for Dam-Settlement Prediction and Structural-Health Assessment , 2018, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.

[11]  C. Gu,et al.  Variable-intercept panel model for deformation zoning of a super-high arch dam , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[12]  Yingchi Mao,et al.  DNN-MVL: DNN-Multi-View-Learning-Based Recover Block Missing Data in a Dam Safety Monitoring System , 2019, Sensors.

[13]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Performance improvement method of support vector machine‐based model monitoring dam safety , 2016 .

[14]  Meng Yang,et al.  A novel model of dam displacement based on panel data , 2018 .

[15]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  An empirical comparison of machine learning techniques for dam behaviour modelling , 2015 .

[16]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Data-Based Models for the Prediction of Dam Behaviour: A Review and Some Methodological Considerations , 2017 .

[17]  G. Oltean,et al.  Multisensorial data fusion and correlation for dams structural health monitoring: (Multi Scale, Uncertainty-Sensitive Heterogeneous Data Integration) , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR).

[18]  Shih-Wei Lin,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for parameter determination and feature selection of support vector machines , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Tianyi Hu,et al.  A spatio-temporal clustering and diagnosis method for concrete arch dams using deformation monitoring data , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[20]  P. Léger,et al.  Hydrostatic, Temperature, Time-Displacement Model for Concrete Dams , 2007 .

[21]  He Jin-ping,et al.  Fusion Model of Multi Monitoring Points on Dam Based on Bayes Theory , 2011 .

[22]  Robin Fell,et al.  Rockfill Modulus and Settlement of Concrete Face Rockfill Dams , 2003 .

[23]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[24]  Zikrija Avdagic,et al.  Multilevel prediction of missing time series dam displacements data based on artificial neural networks voting evaluation , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[25]  Linghe Kong,et al.  Optimizing the Spatio-temporal Distribution of Cyber-Physical Systems for Environment Abstraction , 2010, 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[26]  Michael Oberguggenberger,et al.  Assessment of long‐term coordinate time series using hydrostatic‐season‐time model for rock‐fill embankment dam , 2017 .

[27]  Zaher Mundher Yaseen,et al.  Shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beam using hybrid intelligence models: A new approach , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[28]  Jinping He,et al.  A statistical model of deformation during the construction of a concrete face rockfill dam , 2018 .

[29]  Shuli Fan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the concrete gravity dam damage under earthquake excitation using electro-mechanical impedance measurements , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[30]  C. Gu,et al.  Concrete Dam Displacement Prediction Based on an ISODATA-GMM Clustering and Random Coefficient Model , 2019, Water.