Can we improve the dose distribution for single or multi-lumen breast balloons used for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation?

Purpose The aim of the study was to verify dose distribution parameters for multi-lumen, and artificially created single-lumen balloon applicator used for the same patient with two optimization algorithms: inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) and dose point optimization with distance option. Material and methods Group of 24 patients with multi-lumen balloon applied were investigated. Each patient received 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy (2 fractions daily). For every patient, four treatment plans were prepared. Firstly, for five-lumen balloon optimized with IPSA algorithm and optimization parameters adjusted for each case. Secondly, for the same applicator optimized with dose point optimization and distant option. Two other plans were prepared for single-lumen applicator, created by removing four peripheral lumens, optimized with both algorithms. Results The highest D95 parameter was obtained for plans optimized with IPSA algorithm, mean value 99.3 percent of prescribed dose, and it was significantly higher than plans optimized with dose point algorithm (mean = 83.50%, p < 0.0001), IPSA single-lumen balloon plan (mean = 83.50%, p = 0.0037) and optimized to dose point single-lumen balloon (mean = 85.51%, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences concerning maximum doses distributed to skin surface for neither application nor optimization method. Volumes receiving 200% of prescribed dose in PTV were higher for multi-lumen balloon dose point optimized plans (mean = 8.78%), than for other plans (IPSA multi-lumen balloon plan: mean = 7.37%, p < 0.0001, single-lumen IPSA: mean = 7.20%, p < 0.0001, single-lumen dose point: mean = 7.19%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Basing on performed survey, better dose distribution parameters are obtained for patients with multi-lumen balloon applied and optimized using IPSA algorithm with individualized optimization parameters.

[1]  N. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Contura Multi-Lumen Balloon breast brachytherapy catheter: comparative dosimetric findings of a phase 4 trial. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  C. Coles,et al.  Optimization and comparison of balloon-based partial breast brachytherapy using a single source, a standard plan line source, and both forward and inverse planned multilumen techniques. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[3]  Sheree Brown,et al.  Three-year clinical outcome using the Contura multilumen balloon breast brachytherapy catheter to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): improving radiation standards for the optimal application of APBI. , 2012, Brachytherapy.

[4]  T. Julian,et al.  Optimal application of the Contura multilumen balloon breast brachytherapy catheter vacuum port to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2011, Brachytherapy.

[5]  H. Kuerer,et al.  Five-year analysis of treatment efficacy and cosmesis by the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M. Roşu,et al.  A comparison of skin and chest wall dose delivered with multicatheter, Contura multilumen balloon, and MammoSite breast brachytherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  G. Chronowski A comparison of skin and chest wall dose delivered with multicatheter, Contura multilumen balloon, and MammoSite breast brachytherapy: Cuttino LW, Todor D, Rosu M, et al (Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:34-38, 2011§ , 2011 .

[8]  C. Lawton Patient selection for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery: Recommendations of the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) breast cancer working group based on clinical evidence (2009) , 2011 .

[9]  T. Julian,et al.  Improvements in critical dosimetric endpoints using the Contura multilumen balloon breast brachytherapy catheter to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation: preliminary dosimetric findings of a phase iv trial. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  L. Hughes,et al.  A dosimetric comparison of the Contura multilumen balloon breast brachytherapy catheter vs. the single-lumen MammoSite balloon device in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation at a single institution. , 2011, Brachytherapy.

[11]  Christian M Langton,et al.  Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[12]  F. Vicini,et al.  Phase I/II study evaluating early tolerance in breast cancer patients undergoing accelerated partial breast irradiation treated with the mammosite balloon breast brachytherapy catheter using a 2-day dose schedule. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  K. Haile,et al.  Initial Surgical Experience Evaluating Early Tolerance and Toxicities in Patients Undergoing Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using the Contura® Multi Lumen Balloon Breast Brachytherapy Catheter , 2009, The American surgeon.

[14]  K. Tokita,et al.  A Contura catheter offers dosimetric advantages over a MammoSite catheter that increase the applicability of accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2009, Brachytherapy.

[15]  T. Pawlicki,et al.  Clinical implementation of a new HDR brachytherapy device for partial breast irradiation. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast carcinoma: a systematic review. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  D. Wazer,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation: an analysis of variables associated with late toxicity and long-term cosmetic outcome after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  V. Kini Balloon breast brachytherapy - review of current data. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[19]  F. Vicini,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of three different techniques. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[20]  J. White MammoSite and accelerated partial breast irradiation: Rethinking one-size-fits-all breast irradiation after lumpectomy. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[21]  R. Kreienberg,et al.  Partial Breast Irradiation after Breast-Conserving Surgery , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[22]  M. Rivard,et al.  MammoSite and interstitial brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation , 2004, Cancer.

[23]  D. Wazer,et al.  Factors determining outcome for breast-conserving irradiation with margin-directed dose escalation to the tumor bed. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  I. Gage,et al.  Long-term outcome following breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  A. Luini,et al.  Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.