Who Would You Like to Work With?

People and organizations are increasingly using online platforms to assemble teams. In response, HCI researchers have theorized frameworks and created systems to support team assembly. However, little is known about how users search for and choose teammates on these platforms. We conducted a field study where 530 participants used a team formation system to assemble project teams. We describe how users' traits and social networks influence their teammate searches, teammate choices, and team composition. Our results show that (a) what users initially search for differs from what they finally choose: initially they search for experts and sociable users, but they are ultimately more likely to choose their prior social connections as their teammates; (b) users' decisions lead to non-diverse and segregated teams, where most of the expertise and social capital are concentrated in a few teams. We discuss the implications of these results for designing team formation systems than promote users' agency.

[1]  Ge Gao,et al.  How and to whom people share: the role of culture in self-disclosure in online communities , 2012, CSCW.

[2]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  How Team Interlock Ecosystems Shape the Assembly of Scientific Teams: A Hypergraph Approach , 2018, Communication methods and measures.

[3]  Per Ola Kristensson,et al.  I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions , 2012, CHI 2012.

[4]  Ido Guy,et al.  Best faces forward: a large-scale study of people search in the enterprise , 2012, CHI.

[5]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[6]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Diversity among enterprise online communities: collaborating, teaming, and innovating through social media , 2012, CHI.

[7]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  GitHub Projects. Quality Analysis of Open-Source Software , 2014, SocInfo.

[8]  M. Lobo,et al.  Competent jerks, lovable fools, and the formation of social networks. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[9]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Measuring Team Cohesion , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Team Dating Leads to Better Online Ad Hoc Collaborations , 2017, CSCW.

[11]  Andrea G. Parker,et al.  A Sociotechnical Study of a Community-based Rewards Program , 2017, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Online Dating as Pandora's Box: Methodological Issues for the CSCW Community , 2015, CSCW Companion.

[13]  Hao Wang,et al.  Who should I add as a "friend"?: a study of friend recommendations using proximity and homophily , 2013, MSM '13.

[14]  N. Lin Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[15]  G. Labianca,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Group Social Capital , 2006 .

[16]  Rakesh Agrawal,et al.  Grouping students in educational settings , 2014, KDD.

[17]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Development and Validation of the Political Skill Inventory , 2005 .

[18]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues , 2000 .

[19]  Ashay Saxena,et al.  Factors affecting team performance in globally distributed setting , 2014, SIGSIM-CPR '14.

[20]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[21]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  You Want Me to Work with Who?: Stakeholder Perceptions of Automated Team Formation in Project-based Courses , 2017, CHI.

[22]  Joseph T. Banas,et al.  Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .

[23]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Automated team selection and compliance checking in business processes , 2015, ICSSP.

[24]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  How to Hackathon: Socio-technical Tradeoffs in Brief, Intensive Collocation , 2016, CSCW.

[25]  David Engel,et al.  What Makes a Strong Team?: Using Collective Intelligence to Predict Team Performance in League of Legends , 2017, CSCW.

[26]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria , 2010 .

[27]  S. Zaccaro Nonequivalent Associations Between Forms of Cohesiveness and Group-Related Outcomes: Evidence for Multidimensionality , 1991 .

[28]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites , 2009, CHI.

[29]  Matthew S. Smith,et al.  Social capital in online communities , 2008, PIKM '08.

[30]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[32]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[33]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[34]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Teaming at the Limit: Enhancing Team Effectiveness with Enterprise Social Media Affordances , 2017 .

[35]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  Crowd Size, Diversity and Performance , 2015, CHI.

[36]  Tanja Manser,et al.  Reflection in the heat of the moment: The role of in-action team reflexivity in health care emergency teams , 2018, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[37]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Some assembly required: leveraging Web science to understand and enable team assembly , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  P. Osterman Skill, Training, and Work Organization in American Establishments , 1995 .

[39]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models , 2014 .

[40]  Salima Benbernou,et al.  Discovering Best Teams for Data Leak-Aware Crowdsourcing in Social Networks , 2016, TWEB.

[41]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. , 2006, Psychological assessment.

[43]  Stefan Scherer,et al.  Getting to know you: a multimodal investigation of team behavior and resilience to stress , 2016, ICMI.

[44]  Anuj Karpatne,et al.  Introduction to Data Mining (2nd Edition) , 2018 .

[45]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams: how do perceptions of IT's performance get formed? , 2004, DATB.

[46]  M. Mumford,et al.  Personality, Adaptability, and Performance: Performance on Well-Defined Problem Sovling Tasks , 1993 .

[47]  L. Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams Research , 2015 .

[48]  Andreas Mladenow,et al.  Online cofounder search in tech startups , 2016, iiWAS.

[49]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[50]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  In Search of the Dream Team: Temporally Constrained Multi-Armed Bandits for Identifying Effective Team Structures , 2018, CHI.

[51]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Premkumar T. Devanbu,et al.  Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams , 2015, CHI.

[53]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Enterprise Social Link Recommendation , 2015, CIKM.

[54]  Y. Connie Yuan,et al.  Homophily of Network Ties and Bonding and Bridging Social Capital in Computer-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[55]  G ParkerAndrea,et al.  A Sociotechnical Study of a Community-based Rewards Program , 2017 .

[56]  Ge Gao,et al.  Closure vs. structural holes: how social network information and culture affect choice of collaborators , 2013, CSCW.

[57]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Enhancing Evaluation of Potential Dates Online Through Paired Collaborative Activities , 2015, CSCW.

[58]  James Noble,et al.  The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[59]  M. Neale,et al.  What Differences Make a Difference? , 2005, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[60]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[61]  Gary Garrison,et al.  Globally distributed teams: the effect of diversity on trust, cohesion and individual performance , 2010, DATB.

[62]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Supporting Virtual Team Formation through Community-Wide Deliberation , 2017, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[63]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[64]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Huddler: Convening Stable and Familiar Crowd Teams Despite Unpredictable Availability , 2016, CSCW.

[65]  Maarten de Rijke,et al.  People searching for people: analysis of a people search engine log , 2011, SIGIR '11.

[66]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[67]  Oznur Alkan,et al.  Opportunity Team Builder for Sales Teams , 2018, IUI.

[68]  Anthony Ventresque,et al.  T-RecS: team recommendation system through expertise and cohesiveness , 2011, WWW.

[69]  M. Wesson,et al.  Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Lindred L. Greer,et al.  Power in teams: Effects of team power structures on team conflict and team outcomes , 2014 .

[71]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[72]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  The rise of social bots , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[73]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Workgroup Members , 2022 .

[74]  R. Burt Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[75]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams , 2014, UIST.

[76]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[77]  Leandro Balby Marinho,et al.  Profiling Successful Team Behaviors in League of Legends , 2017, WebMedia.

[78]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing , 2017 .

[80]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  StakeNet: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects , 2010, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering.

[81]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Step by step: Capturing the dynamics of work team process through relational event sequences , 2018 .

[82]  Mo Wang,et al.  When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team , 2016 .

[83]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  Interdisciplinary Matchmaking: Choosing Collaborators by Skill, Acquaintance and Trust , 2010, Computational Social Network Analysis.

[84]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  FriendSensing: recommending friends using mobile phones , 2009, RecSys '09.

[85]  Peter van Rosmalen,et al.  Team formation instruments to enhance learner interactions in open learning environments , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[86]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Power in unity: forming teams in large-scale community systems , 2010, CIKM.