Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials
暂无分享,去创建一个
Morten H. Christiansen | Christopher M. Conway | Morten H Christiansen | Christopher M Conway | Luca Onnis | Luca Onnis
[1] Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al. Attention and probabilistic sequence learning , 1998 .
[2] D. Caplan,et al. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.
[3] Kristine H. Onishi,et al. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience , 2003, Cognition.
[4] C. Petten,et al. A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation , 2007, Brain Research.
[5] Peter Hagoort,et al. Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. , 1994 .
[6] Benjamin Martin Bly,et al. Event-related potential markers of expectation violation in an artificial grammar learning task , 2007, Neuroreport.
[7] Benjamin A Clegg,et al. Sequence learning , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] Christopher M. Conway,et al. Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.
[9] M Eimer,et al. Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[10] Martin Eimer,et al. Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: Electrophysiological indicators , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[11] M. Kutas,et al. Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[12] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[13] Marco Baroni,et al. Generalizable distributional regularities aid fluent language processing , 2008 .
[14] Jutta L. Mueller,et al. The Role of Pause Cues in Language Learning: The Emergence of Event-related Potentials Related to Sequence Processing , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[15] M. Kutas,et al. An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. , 1997, Psychophysiology.
[16] A. Reber. Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .
[17] Peter Ford Dominey,et al. ERP analysis of cognitive sequencing: a left anterior negativity related to structural transformation processing , 2000, Neuroreport.
[18] Todd M. Bailey,et al. The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[19] Axel Cleeremans,et al. Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[20] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.
[21] Dawn G. Blasko,et al. ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[22] Marshall R. Mayberry,et al. Situated sentence processing: The coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model , 2010, Brain and Language.
[23] Thomas F. Mnte,et al. Brain Activity Associated with Syntactic Incongruencies in Words and Pseudo-Words , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] Karsten Steinhauer,et al. Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] Virginia Valian,et al. Anchor points in language learning: The role of marker frequency ☆ , 1988 .
[26] John F. Connolly,et al. CHAPTER 9 – Event-Related Potentials in the Study of Language , 2008 .
[27] John R. Vokey,et al. Salience of Item Knowledge in Learning Artificial Grammars , 1992 .
[28] C. Fiebach,et al. Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions , 2002 .
[29] Yuki Kamide,et al. Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[30] John C. Trueswell,et al. Chapter 7 – Sentence Comprehension , 1995 .
[31] Nick Chater,et al. Reduction of Uncertainty in Human Sequential Learning: Evidence from Artificial Grammar Learning , 2003 .
[32] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Sequential Expectations: The Role of Prediction-Based Learning in Language , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[33] Peter Hagoort,et al. Word-category violations in patients with Broca’s aphasia: An ERP study , 2005, Brain and Language.
[34] S. Coulson,et al. Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[35] C. Phillips,et al. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[36] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Isn't It Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[37] Thomas F Münte,et al. Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[38] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] C. Felser,et al. Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German , 2003, Brain and Language.
[40] E. Newport,et al. Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[41] M. Goldsmith,et al. Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .
[42] A. Friederici,et al. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.
[43] Thomas R. G. Green,et al. The necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages , 1979 .
[44] Peter Hagoort,et al. How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing , 2003, NeuroImage.
[45] Elissa L Newport,et al. Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] A Hahne,et al. What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[47] M. Pickering,et al. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] Christopher M. Conway,et al. Contribution of implicit sequence learning to spoken language processing: some preliminary findings with hearing adults. , 2007, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.
[49] J. Saffran. Statistical Language Learning , 2003 .
[50] R. Aslin,et al. Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[51] M. Nissen,et al. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.
[52] S. Edelman,et al. Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues , 2008, Cognition.
[53] C. Phillips,et al. The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations , 2007, Brain Research.
[54] R. C. Oldfield. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[55] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[56] Stefan Koelsch,et al. Musical training modulates the development of syntax processing in children , 2009, NeuroImage.
[57] S L Wolf,et al. An Alternative Perspective , 1999, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.
[58] G. Dell,et al. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[59] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.
[60] E. Newport,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .
[61] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Hierarchical and Linear Sequence Processing: An Electrophysiological Exploration of Two Different Grammar Types , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[62] Tim Curran,et al. Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .
[63] E. Pothos. Theories of artificial grammar learning. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.
[64] Kara D. Federmeier. Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[65] R. Gómez. Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.
[66] David Swinney,et al. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing , 1994 .
[67] A. Friederici,et al. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[68] P. Holcomb,et al. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .
[69] D. Poeppel,et al. The linguistic processes underlying the P600 , 2010 .
[70] M. Kutas,et al. Getting it: human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.
[71] B. Scholl,et al. The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .
[72] M. Bar. The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[73] J. Elman,et al. Networks are not ‘hidden rules’ , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[74] Scott Sinnett,et al. Speech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention , 2005, Cognition.
[75] James L. McClelland,et al. Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[76] Angela D. Friederici,et al. When word category information encounters morphosyntax: An ERP study , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.
[77] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Sequential learning in non-human primates , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[78] Marina Nespor,et al. Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.
[79] Jenny R Saffran,et al. Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning , 2001, Cognition.
[80] M. Ferguson,et al. How social perception can automatically influence behavior , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[81] M. Kutas,et al. Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[82] D. Caplan,et al. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[83] Frank Rösler,et al. Response Anticipation Processes in the Learning of a Sensorimotor Sequence: Evidence from the Latera , 2001 .
[84] L. Osterhout,et al. Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .
[85] Peter Ford Dominey,et al. Training with cognitive sequences improves syntactic comprehension in agrammatic aphasics , 2003, Neuroreport.
[86] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Learning : rule extraction and representation , 1999 .
[87] L R Squire,et al. The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[88] A. Friederici. The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.
[89] Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.
[90] P. Perruchet,et al. Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[91] Spatz Wb. Unipolar brush cells in marmoset cerebellum and cochlear nuclei express calbindin. , 2000 .
[92] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism , 2010, Cognition.
[93] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[94] D. Swinney,et al. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[95] D. Tucker. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[96] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. When Less is Less and When Less is More: Starting Small with Staged Input , 2003 .
[97] F Rösler,et al. Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. , 2000, Acta psychologica.
[98] Peter Neri,et al. Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.
[99] D. Tucker,et al. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[100] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[101] Peter M. Vishton,et al. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.
[102] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Statistical Learning Within and Between Modalities Pitting Abstract Against Stimulus-Specific Representations , 2022 .
[103] Van Berkum,et al. Understanding Sentences in Context What Brain Waves Can Tell Us , 2008 .
[104] Peter Hagoort,et al. Reflections on the neurobiology of syntax , 2009 .
[105] L. Osterhout,et al. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .
[106] Tomifusa Kuboki,et al. Explicit knowledge and intention to learn in sequence learning: an event-related potential study , 2005, Neuroreport.
[107] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[108] Patricia J. Brooks,et al. Acquisition of Gender-like Noun Subclasses in an Artificial Language: The Contribution of Phonological Markers to Learning , 1993 .
[109] Arnaud Delorme,et al. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[110] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. A Connectionist Single-Mechanism Account of Rule-Like Behavior in Infancy , 2000 .
[111] M. Linden,et al. Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning. , 1997 .
[112] Janet L. McDonald,et al. Properties of Phonological Markers That Affect the Acquisition of Gender-Like Subclasses☆☆☆★ , 1998 .
[113] L. Osterhout,et al. Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study , 2003 .
[114] L. L. Elliott,et al. Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) Test. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[115] H. Neville,et al. Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[116] Colin M. Brown,et al. The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .
[117] J. Saffran. Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .
[118] E. Kaan,et al. Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[119] R. Gómez,et al. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[120] Aniruddh D. Patel,et al. Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[121] Z. Dienes,et al. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants and neural networks , 1999 .
[122] Simon Kirby,et al. Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax , 2009 .
[123] Y. Niv,et al. Dialogues on prediction errors , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[124] A. Friederici,et al. Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[125] Ellen F. Lau,et al. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.
[126] Peter Ford Dominey,et al. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE: Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs instances in a cognitive sequencing task , 2000 .
[127] N. Chater,et al. Transfer in artificial grammar learning : A reevaluation , 1996 .
[128] D. Shanks,et al. Two mechanisms in implicit artificial grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997). , 1999 .
[129] R. C. Oldfield. THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .
[130] Manuel Carreiras,et al. Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[131] Michael A. Stadler,et al. Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. , 1992 .
[132] Axel Mecklinger,et al. Error and Deviance Processing in Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[133] Frank Rösler,et al. 5. Representation and Learning of Structure in Perceptuo-Motor Event-Sequences , 1999 .
[134] M. Kutas,et al. Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .
[135] Jutta L. Mueller,et al. Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[136] M. Garrett,et al. Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[137] T. Gunter,et al. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony , 2010, Brain Research.
[138] E. Gibson,et al. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .
[139] Kaan Edith. Fundamental Syntactic Phenomena and Their Putative Relation to the Brain , 2009 .
[140] Peder J. Johnson,et al. Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .
[141] G. Mulder,et al. When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.
[142] Axel Cleeremans,et al. Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[143] R. Aslin,et al. Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[144] R. Gómez,et al. Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.
[145] S. Coulson,et al. Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[146] P. Hagoort,et al. A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .
[147] C. Petten,et al. Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[148] Patricia K. Kuhl,et al. Grammatical Processing without Semantics? An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Preschoolers using Jabberwocky Sentences , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[149] Sarah C. Creel,et al. Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[150] J. Bruce Tomblin,et al. Procedural Learning in Adolescents With and Without Specific Language Impairment , 2007 .
[151] E. Newport,et al. Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .