Students' tool-use within a web enhanced course: Explanatory mechanisms of students' tool-use pattern

Abstract The popularity of content management systems (CMSs) in today’s higher education is driven by the assumption that providing a rich toolset and leaving the use of this toolset under learner control will stimulate self-regulated and deeper learning. Current evidence on students’ tool-use within CMS supported courses however tackles this assumption and indicates that CMSs may empower students’ learning only under particular learner-related conditions. The current study addresses this concern and investigates how students’ tool-use within a CMS supported course can be explained in terms of (a) students’ conceptions on the tool functionalities, (b) self-efficacy beliefs for self-regulated learning and (c) goal orientation. Data were collected within a first year undergraduate course ‘Learning and Instruction’. Students’ ( n  = 182) tool-use within the course was logged throughout the course episode and the influencing variables were measured through questionnaires. K-means cluster analyses revealed four clusters that reflected differences in students’ tool-choice and tool-use throughout the course. Multinominal regression analyses revealed that these tool-use differences could be explained in terms of students’ goal orientation. The study provides thus perspectives in order to capture students’ academic motivation through unobtrusive, behavioral, measures. Furthermore, questions are raised regarding the parallel between students’ tool-use pattern and study strategy use.

[1]  Krista R. Muis,et al.  Examining the stability of achievement goal orientation , 2009 .

[2]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Distributed collaboration activities in a blended learning scenario and the effects on learning performance , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink.  The Dilemma of Performance-Approach Goals: The Use of Multiple Goal Contexts to Promote Students' Motivation and Learning. , 2005 .

[4]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  A METACOGNITIVE VIEW OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING , 1996 .

[5]  F. Hesse,et al.  When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students’ conceptions of educational technology , 2004 .

[6]  Genevieve Marie Johnson,et al.  Student Alienation, Academic Achievement, and WebCT Use , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Zheng Wang,et al.  A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Mining LMS data to develop an "early warning system" for educators: A proof of concept , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Jan Elen,et al.  Adopting webcasts over time: the influence of perceptions and attitudes , 2011, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.

[10]  A. Elliot.  Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals , 1999 .

[11]  R. Azevedo.  Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[12]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Content Management Systems: Enriched learning opportunities for all? , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Students’ perspectives on learning environments , 2004 .

[14]  Judith M. Harackiewicz,et al.  Regulation of Achievement Goals: The Role of Competence Feedback. , 2005 .

[15]  G. Salomon.  Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. , 1984 .

[16]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[17]  Margaret L. Rice,et al.  A Comparison of Student Outcomes & Satisfaction between Traditional & Web Based Course Offerings , 2002 .

[18]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[19]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The relationships between learner variables, tool-usage behaviour and performance , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Steven R. Malikowski,et al.  A Model for Research into Course Management Systems: Bridging Technology and Learning Theory , 2007 .

[22]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects , 1982 .

[23]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models , 2013 .

[24]  Kristy J. Lauver,et al.  Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Jennifer A. Lyke,et al.  Cognition in Context: Students’ Perceptions of Classroom Goal Structures and Reported Cognitive Strategy Use in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[26]  Branka Spehar,et al.  Resource use and academic performance among first year psychology students , 2007 .

[27]  Dave Goforth,et al.  Learner Control = Decision Making + Information: A Model and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[28]  A. Kitsantas,et al.  Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments , 2002 .

[29]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  A. Elliot,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION , 1997 .

[32]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Influences on achievement : Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement , 1996 .

[33]  Pam Marek,et al.  Pedagogical Aids in Textbooks: Do College Students' Perceptions Justify Their Prevalence? , 1999 .

[34]  Anastasia Kitsantas,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Self-Efficacy for Learning Form (SELF) Scores of College Students , 2007 .

[35]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Stability and change in achievement goals. , 2007 .

[36]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Student Behavior and Interaction Patterns With an LMS as Motivation Predictors in E-Learning Settings , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[37]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  Student Use of Scaffolding Software: Relationships with Motivation and Conceptual Understanding , 2008 .

[38]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Interactive learning environments to support independent learning: The impact of discernability of embedded support devices , 1997, Comput. Educ..

[39]  E. Stahl,et al.  Help-seeking in Interactive Learning Environments: Effectiveness of Help and Learner-related Factors in a Dyadic Setting , 2004, ICLS.

[40]  Douglas Steinley,et al.  Local optima in K-means clustering: what you don't know may hurt you. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[41]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[42]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Instructional conceptions: Analysis from an instructional design perspective , 2004 .

[43]  H. Coates,et al.  A Critical Examination Of The Effects Of Learning Management Systems On University Teaching And Learning , 2005 .

[44]  Youyan Nie,et al.  Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. , 2008 .

[45]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Innovative instructional intervention and the need for a better insight into instructional conceptions , 2010 .

[46]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Tool-use in a blended undergraduate course: In Search of user profiles , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Richard S. Newman,et al.  Students' help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals. , 1998 .

[48]  Sherria L. Hoskins,et al.  Motivation and ability: which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[49]  R. Arteaga Sánchez,et al.  Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  C. Fox,et al.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2001 .

[51]  Nor Azan Mat Zin,et al.  Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology the Success of Learning Management System among Distance Learners in Malaysian Universities Student, School of Information Technology , 2022 .

[52]  O. Behling,et al.  Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments: Problems and Solutions , 2000 .

[53]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[54]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[55]  K. Kemper,et al.  Curriculum Resource Use and Relationships With Educational Outcomes in an Online Curriculum , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[56]  D. Perkins.  The Fingertip Effect: How Information-Processing Technology Shapes Thinking , 1985 .

[57]  Mariane Frenay,et al.  Task Value, Self-Efficacy and Goal Orientations: Impact on self-regulated learning, choice and performance among university students , 2007 .

[58]  T. Andre.  Does Answering Higher-Level Questions While Reading Facilitate Productive Learning? , 1979 .

[59]  M. Lepper.  Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. , 1985 .

[60]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The Role of Goal Orientation and Self-Efficacy in Learning from Web-Based Worked Examples , 2009 .