ShapeMed-Knee: A Dataset and Neural Shape Model Benchmark for Modeling 3D Femurs

Analyzing anatomic shapes of tissues and organs is pivotal for accurate disease diagnostics and clinical decision-making. One prominent disease that depends on anatomic shape analysis is osteoarthritis, which affects 30 million Americans. To advance osteoarthritis diagnostics and prognostics, we introduce ShapeMed-Knee, a 3D shape dataset with 9,376 high-resolution, medical imaging-based 3D shapes of both femur bone and cartilage. Besides data, ShapeMed-Knee includes two benchmarks for assessing reconstruction accuracy and five clinical prediction tasks that assess the utility of learned shape representations. Leveraging ShapeMed-Knee, we develop and evaluate a novel hybrid explicit-implicit neural shape model which achieves up to 40% better reconstruction accuracy than a statistical shape model and implicit neural shape model. Our hybrid models achieve state-of-the-art performance for preserving cartilage biomarkers; they are also the first models to successfully predict localized structural features of osteoarthritis, outperforming shape models and convolutional neural networks applied to raw magnetic resonance images and segmentations. The ShapeMed-Knee dataset provides medical evaluations to reconstruct multiple anatomic surfaces and embed meaningful disease-specific information. ShapeMed-Knee reduces barriers to applying 3D modeling in medicine, and our benchmarks highlight that advancements in 3D modeling can enhance the diagnosis and risk stratification for complex diseases. The dataset, code, and benchmarks will be made freely accessible.

[1]  Alan Brett,et al.  3-dimensional bone shape and knee osteoarthritis: what have we learned? , 2024, Osteoarthritis Imaging.

[2]  Bjoern H Menze,et al.  Learning continuous shape priors from sparse data with neural implicit functions , 2024, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Loriann M. Hynes,et al.  Investigating the reliability and validity of subacromial space measurements using ultrasound and MRI , 2023, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[4]  A. Guermazi,et al.  Artificial intelligence in osteoarthritis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2023, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  Bjoern H Menze,et al.  MedShapeNet - A Large-Scale Dataset of 3D Medical Shapes for Computer Vision , 2023, ArXiv.

[6]  W. B. Edwards,et al.  Sex disparities in tibia-fibula geometry and density are associated with elevated bone strain in females: A cross-validation study. , 2023, Bone.

[7]  Kevin H. Leung,et al.  Prediction of total knee replacement using deep learning analysis of knee MRI , 2023, Scientific reports.

[8]  S. Delp,et al.  Predicting Chronic Knee Pain Using An Automated Mri-Based Bone And Cartilage Statistical Shape Model: Data From The Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2023, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

[9]  Felix Heide,et al.  Diffusion-SDF: Conditional Generative Modeling of Signed Distance Functions , 2022, 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[10]  Mohammad Zalbagi Darestani,et al.  MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare , 2022, ArXiv.

[11]  David B. Lindell,et al.  Scale-Agnostic Super-Resolution in MRI using Feature-Based Coordinate Networks , 2022, ArXiv.

[12]  Huy Hoang Nguyen,et al.  The KNee OsteoArthritis Prediction (KNOAP2020) challenge: An image analysis challenge to predict incident symptomatic radiographic knee osteoarthritis from MRI and X-ray images , 2022, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  Bjoern H Menze,et al.  Landmark-Free Statistical Shape Modeling Via Neural Flow Deformations , 2022, MICCAI.

[14]  L. Sharma,et al.  Comparison of Evaluation Metrics of Deep Learning for Imbalanced Imaging Data in Osteoarthritis Studies , 2022, medRxiv.

[15]  H. Bao,et al.  Vox-Surf: Voxel-Based Implicit Surface Representation , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Vedrana Andersen Dahl,et al.  Deep Active Latent Surfaces for Medical Geometries , 2022, ArXiv.

[17]  A. Gatti,et al.  Investigating acute changes in osteoarthritic cartilage by integrating biomechanics and statistical shape models of bone: data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2022, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[18]  P. Hansen,et al.  External validation of an artificial intelligence tool for radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity classification. , 2022, European journal of radiology.

[19]  G. Gold,et al.  Automatic estimation of knee effusion from limited MRI data , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Michael F. Vignos,et al.  Influence of Articular Geometry and Tibial Tubercle Location on Patellofemoral Kinematics and Contact Mechanics. , 2022, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[21]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  A statistical shape model for radiation-free assessment and classification of craniosynostosis , 2022, ArXiv.

[22]  B. Ommer,et al.  High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models , 2021, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[23]  Shalini De Mello,et al.  Efficient Geometry-aware 3D Generative Adversarial Networks , 2021, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[24]  S. Raschka,et al.  Deep neural networks for rank-consistent ordinal regression based on conditional probabilities , 2021, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[25]  M. Hunt,et al.  The Influence of Running on Lower Limb Cartilage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2021, Sports Medicine.

[26]  A. Gatti,et al.  Automatic knee cartilage and bone segmentation using multi-stage convolutional neural networks: data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2021, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[27]  J. Shan,et al.  Knee Osteoarthritis Classification Using 3D CNN and MRI , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[28]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Deep learning for large scale MRI-based morphological phenotyping of osteoarthritis , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[29]  R. Ramamoorthi,et al.  Modulated Periodic Activations for Generalizable Local Functional Representations , 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[30]  Christoph M. Augustin,et al.  Linking statistical shape models and simulated function in the healthy adult human heart , 2021, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Albert Swiecicki,et al.  Deep learning-based algorithm for assessment of knee osteoarthritis severity in radiographs matches performance of radiologists , 2021, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[32]  Christoph von Tycowicz,et al.  Geodesic B-Score for Improved Assessment of Knee Osteoarthritis , 2021, IPMI.

[33]  B. Dube,et al.  Machine-learning, MRI bone shape and important clinical outcomes in osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

[34]  Christian F. Baumgartner,et al.  Accuracy and longitudinal reproducibility of quantitative femorotibial cartilage measures derived from automated U-Net-based segmentation of two different MRI contrasts: data from the osteoarthritis initiative healthy reference cohort , 2020, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[35]  Krzysztof J. Geras,et al.  Prediction of Total Knee Replacement and Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis by Using Deep Learning on Knee Radiographs: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2020, Radiology.

[36]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functions , 2020, NeurIPS.

[37]  Giannis Giakas,et al.  Machine learning in knee osteoarthritis: A review , 2020, Osteoarthritis and cartilage open.

[38]  Mehmet Akcakaya,et al.  The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset , 2020, Radiology. Artificial intelligence.

[39]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Curriculum DeepSDF , 2020, ECCV.

[40]  Marc Pollefeys,et al.  Convolutional Occupancy Networks , 2020, ECCV.

[41]  S. Delp,et al.  Automated Classification of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Using Deep Neural Networks. , 2020, Radiology. Artificial intelligence.

[42]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Intra-articular sprifermin reduces cartilage loss in addition to increasing cartilage gain independent of location in the femorotibial joint: post-hoc analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial , 2020, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[43]  P. Sharkey,et al.  The Significance of Osteoarthritis-associated Bone Marrow Lesions in the Knee. , 2019, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[44]  Bane Sullivan,et al.  PyVista: 3D plotting and mesh analysis through a streamlined interface for the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[45]  Michael J Rainbow,et al.  The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics. , 2019, Medical engineering & physics.

[46]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia , 2019, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[47]  Stefan Zachow,et al.  Automated segmentation of knee bone and cartilage combining statistical shape knowledge and convolutional neural networks: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[48]  Richard A. Newcombe,et al.  DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[49]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Robust Watertight Manifold Surface Generation Method for ShapeNet Models , 2018, ArXiv.

[50]  Ziv Yaniv,et al.  SimpleITK Image-Analysis Notebooks: a Collaborative Environment for Education and Reproducible Research , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[51]  Frank Hutter,et al.  Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization , 2017, ICLR.

[52]  Simo Saarakkala,et al.  Automatic Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis from Plain Radiographs: A Deep Learning-Based Approach , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[53]  Duhwan Mun,et al.  Three-dimensional solid reconstruction of a human bone from CT images using interpolation with triangular Bézier patches , 2017, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology.

[54]  C. Helmick,et al.  Alternative Methods for Defining Osteoarthritis and the Impact on Estimating Prevalence in a US Population‐Based Survey , 2016, Arthritis care & research.

[55]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository , 2015, ArXiv.

[56]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Defining the presence of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a comparison between the Kellgren and Lawrence system and OARSI atlas criteria , 2015, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[57]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[58]  L. McLean,et al.  Validity and sensitivity to change of three scales for the radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis using images from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST). , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[59]  F Eckstein,et al.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis. , 2014, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[60]  J. Polimeni,et al.  FOCUSR: Feature Oriented Correspondence Using Spectral Regularization--A Method for Precise Surface Matching , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[61]  Ali Guermazi,et al.  Why radiography should no longer be considered a surrogate outcome measure for longitudinal assessment of cartilage in knee osteoarthritis , 2011, Arthritis research & therapy.

[62]  R. Boudreau,et al.  Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[63]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative Cartilage Imaging in Knee Osteoarthritis , 2010, Arthritis.

[64]  Hai Fang,et al.  Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[65]  A. James Stewart,et al.  Prediction of the Repair Surface over Cartilage Defects: A Comparison of Three Methods in a Sheep Model , 2009, MICCAI.

[66]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  A Technique for Regional Analysis of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Based on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[67]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[68]  Jean-Marc Chassery,et al.  Approximated Centroidal Voronoi Diagrams for Uniform Polygonal Mesh Coarsening , 2004, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[69]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[70]  Roy D. Altman,et al.  Workshop for Consensus on Osteoarthritis Imaging: MRI of the knee , 2006 .