High Prevalence of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae Detected in the Human Gut Using an Improved DNA Detection Protocol

Background The low and variable prevalence of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae DNA in human stool contrasts with the paramount role of these methanogenic Archaea in digestion processes. We hypothesized that this contrast is a consequence of the inefficiencies of current protocols for archaeon DNA extraction. We developed a new protocol for the extraction and PCR-based detection of M. smithii and M. stadtmanae DNA in human stool. Methodology/Principal Findings Stool specimens collected from 700 individuals were filtered, mechanically lysed twice, and incubated overnight with proteinase K prior to DNA extraction using a commercial DNA extraction kit. Total DNA was used as a template for quantitative real-time PCR targeting M. smithii and M. stadtmanae 16S rRNA and rpoB genes. Amplification of 16S rRNA and rpoB yielded positive detection of M. smithii in 95.7% and M. stadtmanae in 29.4% of specimens. Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene PCR products from 30 randomly selected specimens (15 for M. smithii and 15 for M. stadtmanae) yielded a sequence similarity of 99–100% using the reference M. smithii ATCC 35061 and M. stadtmanae DSM 3091 sequences. Conclusions/Significance In contrast to previous reports, these data indicate a high prevalence of the methanogens M. smithii and M. stadtmanae in the human gut, with the former being an almost ubiquitous inhabitant of the intestinal microbiome.

[1]  J. Gordon,et al.  A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host-archaeal-bacterial mutualism. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Kuskowski,et al.  Stability of human methanogenic flora over 35 years and a review of insights obtained from breath methane measurements. , 2006, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[3]  Yu A. Ovchinnikov,et al.  The primary structure of E. coli RNA polymerase, Nucleotide sequence of the rpoC gene and amino acid sequence of the beta'-subunit , 1982, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  A. Murray,et al.  Carriage, quantification, and predominance of methanogens and sulfate‐reducing bacteria in faecal samples , 2006, Letters in applied microbiology.

[5]  P. Evans,et al.  Analysis of Methanogen Diversity in the Rumen Using Temporal Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis: Identification of Uncultured Methanogens , 2007, Microbial Ecology.

[6]  W. Zillig,et al.  Organization and nucleotide sequence of the genes encoding the large subunits A, B and C of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase of the archaebacterium Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  H. Harada,et al.  Evaluation of enzymatic cell treatments for application of CARD-FISH to methanogens. , 2008, Journal of microbiological methods.

[8]  H. Klenk,et al.  DNA-dependent RNA polymerase subunit B as a tool for phylogenetic reconstructions: Branching topology of the archaeal domain , 1994, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[9]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[10]  A. Macario,et al.  Isolation of Methanobrevibacter smithii from human feces , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  T. Miller,et al.  Enumeration of Methanobrevibacter smithii in human feces , 1982, Archives of Microbiology.

[12]  T. Miller,et al.  Methanogens and anaerobes in a colon segment isolated from the normal fecal stream , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  F. Shanahan,et al.  Human methanogen diversity and incidence in healthy and diseased colonic groups using mcrA gene analysis , 2008, BMC Microbiology.

[14]  S. Ricke,et al.  Detection of methane and quantification of methanogenic archaea in faeces from young broiler chickens using real‐time PCR , 2007, Letters in applied microbiology.

[15]  D. Raoult,et al.  Complete rpoB gene sequencing as a suitable supplement to DNA-DNA hybridization for bacterial species and genus delineation. , 2008, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[16]  M. Alric,et al.  A putative new order of methanogenic Archaea inhabiting the human gut, as revealed by molecular analyses of the mcrA gene. , 2008, Research in microbiology.

[17]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  Use of syringe methods for anaerobiosis. , 1972, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  L. Daniels,et al.  Methanogenic bacteria in human vaginal samples , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[19]  N. Mcneil.  The contribution of the large intestine to energy supplies in man. , 1984, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[20]  H. Richet,et al.  Determination of HPV type 16 and 18 viral load in cervical smears of women referred to colposcopy , 2006, Journal of medical virology.

[21]  L. Daniels,et al.  Methanogenic bacteria from human dental plaque , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[22]  R. Wilson,et al.  Genomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Daniel B. DiGiulio,et al.  Development of the Human Infant Intestinal Microbiota , 2007, PLoS biology.

[24]  F. Kitame,et al.  Isolation of an antigenically unique methanogen from human feces , 1986, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[25]  D. Raoult,et al.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in the stools of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. , 2009, Microbiology.

[26]  W. F. Fricke,et al.  The Genome Sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae Reveals Why This Human Intestinal Archaeon Is Restricted to Methanol and H2 for Methane Formation and ATP Synthesis , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  U. Deppenmeier.  The unique biochemistry of methanogenesis. , 2002, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[28]  E. Purdom,et al.  Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora , 2005, Science.