Noise and the absolute thresholds of cone and rod vision

Literature data on light detection by cone and rod vision at absolute threshold are analysed in order (1) to decide whether the threshold performance of dark-adapted cone vision can, like that of rod vision, be consistently explained as limited by noise from a "dark light"; (2) to obtain comparable estimates of the dark noise and dark light of (foveal) cones and (peripheral) rods. The dark noise was estimated by a maximum-likelihood procedure from frequency-of-seeing data and compared with the dark light derived from increment-threshold functions. In both cone and rod vision, the estimated dark noise coincides with Poisson fluctuations of the estimated dark light if 17% (best estimate) of lambda max-quanta incident at the cornea produce excitations. At that fraction of quanta exciting, dark lights are equivalent to 112 isomerisations per sec in each foveal cone and 0.011 isomerisations per sec in each rod. It is concluded that (1) the threshold performance of dark-adapted cone as well as rod vision can be consistently described as noise-limited, but not by postulating a multi-quantum coincidence requirement for single receptors; (2) the underlying intrinsic activity in both the cone and the rod system is light-like as regards correspondence between noise effect and background adaptation effect. One possibility is that this activity is largely composed of events identical to the single-photon response, originating in the visual pigment, in cones as well as in rods.

[1]  L. Sharpe,et al.  Temporal summation in the achromat , 1988, Vision Research.

[2]  H. Barlow Chapter 16 – THE PHYSICAL LIMITS OF VISUAL DISCRIMINATION , 1964 .

[3]  D. Baylor,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  F. Marriott The foveal absolute visual threshold for short flashes and small fields , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  H. Barlow,et al.  Responses to single quanta of light in retinal ganglion cells of the cat. , 1971, Vision research.

[6]  R. M. Herrick Foveal luminance discrimination as a function of the duration of the decrement or increment in luminance. , 1956 .

[7]  K. Donner The absolute sensitivity of vision: can a frog become a perfect detector of light-induced and dark rod events? , 1989 .

[8]  B. Sakitt Counting every quantum , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  S. Hecht,et al.  ENERGY, QUANTA, AND VISION , 1942, The Journal of general physiology.

[10]  C. M. Cicerone,et al.  The density of cones in the fovea centralis of the human dichromat , 1989, Vision Research.

[11]  T. Lamb,et al.  Analysis of electrical noise in turtle cones , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  F. C. Rodger,et al.  The relationship of visual threshold to retinal position and area , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  T E Cohn,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis. Application to the study of quantum fluctuation effects in optic nerve of Rana pipiens , 1975, The Journal of general physiology.

[14]  J. Bowmaker,et al.  Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  K. Donner,et al.  The frequency of isomerization‐like ‘dark’ events in rhodopsin and porphyropsin rods of the bull‐frog retina. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Relation between directional sensitivity and spectral response curves in human cone vision. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Quantum efficiency of dark-adapted human vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  D. Baylor,et al.  Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Scotopic acuity and absolute threshold in brief flashes , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  H. V. Velden Over het aantal lichtquanta dat nodig is voor een lichtprikkel bij het menselijk oog , 1944 .

[21]  Henrik Sjögren,et al.  ZUR KENNTNIS DER KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS SICCA II , 1935 .

[22]  Recovery from the Increase of the Stiles–Crawford Effect after Bleaching , 1966, Nature.

[23]  B. Boycott,et al.  Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina , 1989, Nature.

[24]  David R. Williams,et al.  Punctate sensitivity of the blue-sensitive mechanism , 1981, Vision Research.

[25]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Impulse functions for human rod vision , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  C. M. Cicerone,et al.  The relative numbers of long-wavelength-sensitive to middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis , 1989, Vision Research.

[27]  M A BOUMAN,et al.  The two-quanta explanation of the dependence of the threshold values and visual acuity on the visual angle and the time of observation. , 1947, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[28]  B. Hillmann Relationship between stimulus size and threshold intensity in the fovea measured at four exposure times. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[29]  G. Brindley The relation of frequency of detection to intensity of stimulus for a system of many independent detectors each of which is stimulated by a m‐quantum coincidence , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  D. Baylor,et al.  The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  H. Kolb,et al.  Anatomical pathways for color vision in the human retina , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  H. Barlow Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  The two-quanta hypothesis as a general explanation for the behavior of threshold values and visual acuity for the several receptors of the human eye. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[34]  E. Baumgardt,et al.  Duration and size as determinants of peripheral retinal response. , 1961, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  J. Mollon,et al.  Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[36]  B. Sakitt Configuration dependence of scotopic spatial summation , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  H. Barlow Retinal noise and absolute threshold. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[38]  A. Stockman,et al.  The incremental threshold of the rod visual system and Weber's law. , 1989, Science.

[39]  D. Copenhagen,et al.  Ganglion cell performance at absolute threshold in toad retina: effects of dark events in rods. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Psychophysical experiments on spatial summation at threshold level of the human peripheral retina , 1977, Vision Research.

[42]  Christine A. Curcio,et al.  The spatial resolution capacity of human foveal retina , 1989, Vision Research.

[43]  J. Lythgoe,et al.  The visual pigments of rods and cones in the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Foveal cone thresholds , 1989, Vision Research.

[45]  D. Baylor,et al.  Visual transduction in cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  R. Weale,et al.  Nervous mechanisms and dark‐adaptation , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  Mesure Pyrométrique du Seuil Visuel Absolu , 1960 .

[48]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea , 1991, Vision Research.

[49]  E. Baumgardt Threshold Quantal Problems , 1972 .

[50]  W. Stiles,et al.  Saturation of the Rod Mechanism of the Retina at High Levels of Stimulation , 1954 .

[51]  Stiles Ws Investigations of the scotopic and trichromatic mechanisms of vision by the two-colour threshold technique. , 1949 .

[52]  W A Rushton,et al.  Dark adaptation and increment threshold in a rod monochromat. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  Quantum efficiency and false positive rate , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  The variations in visual threshold measurement , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  J L Zacks,et al.  Temporal Summation Phenomena at Threshold: Their Relation to Visual Mechanisms , 1970, Science.

[56]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[57]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[58]  G S Brindley The Order of Coincidence Required for Visual Threshold , 1954 .

[59]  J. J. Vos,et al.  Light profiles of the foveal image of a point source , 1976, Vision Research.

[60]  A. Snyder,et al.  The Stiles-Crawford effect--explanation and consequences. , 1973, Vision research.

[61]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[62]  H. Barlow,et al.  Purkinje Shift and Retinal Noise , 1957, Nature.

[63]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Foveal cone detection statistics in color-normals and dichromats , 1991, Vision Research.