Convex ENO High Order Multi-dimensional Schemes without Field by Field Decomposition or Staggered Grids

Second order accurate (first order at extrema) cell averaged based approximations extending the Lax?Friedrichs central scheme, using component-wise rather than field-by-field limiting, have been found to give surprisingly good results for a wide class of problems involving shocks (see H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor,J. Comput. Phys.87, 408, 1990). The advantages of component-wise limiting compared to its counterpart, field-by-field limiting, are apparent: (1) No complete set of eigenvectors is needed and hence weakly hyperbolic systems can be solved. (2) Component-wise limiting is faster than field-by-field limiting. (3) The programming is much simpler, especially for complicated coupled systems of many equations. However, these methods are based on cell-averages in a staggered grid and are thus a bit complicated to extend to multiple dimensions. Moreover the staggering causes slight difficulties at the boundaries. In this work we modify and extend this component-wise central differencing based procedure in two directions: (1) Point values, rather than cell averages are used, thus removing the need for staggered grids, and also making the extension to multi-dimensions quite simple. We use TVD Runge?Kutta time discretizations to update the solution. (2) A new type of decision process, which follows the general ENO philosophy is introduced and used. This procedure enables us to extend our method to a third order component-wise central ENO scheme, which apparently works well and is quite simple to implement in multi-dimensions. Additionally, our numerical viscosity is governed by the local magnitude of the maximum eigenvalue of the Jacobian, thus reducing the smearing in the numerical results. We found a speed up of a factor of 2 in each space dimension, on a SGIO2workstation, over methods based on field-by-field decomposition limiting. The new decision process leads to new, “convex” ENO schemes which, we believe, are of interest in a more general setting. Our numerical results show the value of these new methods.

[1]  S. Osher,et al.  Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, 111 , 1987 .

[2]  Jian-Guo Liu,et al.  The Reconstruction of Upwind Fluxes for Conservation Laws , 1998 .

[3]  B. Engquist,et al.  Multi-phase computations in geometrical optics , 1996 .

[4]  E. Tadmor,et al.  Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws , 1990 .

[5]  Eitan Tadmor,et al.  Nonoscillatory Central Schemes for Multidimensional Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  P. Sweby High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1984 .

[7]  Z. Xin,et al.  The relaxation schemes for systems of conservation laws in arbitrary space dimensions , 1995 .

[8]  S. Osher,et al.  High-Resolution Nonoscillatory Central Schemes with Nonstaggered Grids for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1998 .

[9]  E. Tadmor,et al.  Third order nonoscillatory central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws , 1998 .

[10]  S. Osher,et al.  Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,II , 1989 .

[11]  S. Osher,et al.  Uniformly High-Order Accurate Nonoscillatory Schemes. I , 1987 .

[12]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes , 1995 .

[13]  Stanley Osher,et al.  Nonoscillatory high order accurate self-similar maximum principle satisfying shock capturing schemes I , 1996 .

[14]  Chi-Wang Shu Numerical experiments on the accuracy of ENO and modified ENO schemes , 1990 .

[15]  S. Osher Riemann Solvers, the Entropy Condition, and Difference , 1984 .

[16]  P. Woodward,et al.  The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks , 1984 .

[17]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  A Well-Behaved TVD Limiter for High-Resolution Calculations of Unsteady Flow , 1997 .