Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige

In many human societies, high male social status associates with higher fertility, but the means by which status increases lifetime fitness have not been systematically investigated. We analyse the pathways by which male status begets reproductive success in a small-scale, Amerindian society. Men who are more likely to win a dyadic physical confrontation, i.e. dominant men, have higher intra-marital fertility for their age, and men with more community-wide influence, i.e. prestigious men, exhibit both higher intra-marital fertility and lower offspring mortality. Both forms of status elicit support from allies and deference from competitors, but high status men are not provisioned more than their peers. Prestigious but not dominant men marry wives who first give birth at earlier ages, which multivariate analysis suggests is the strongest pathway between status and fitness in this population. Furthermore, men are motivated to pursue status because of fitness gains both within and outside of marital unions: dominant and prestigious men have more in-pair surviving offspring as well as more extra-marital affairs.

[1]  M. Alvard,et al.  GOOD LAMALERA WHALE HUNTERS ACCRUE REPRODUCTIVE BENEFITS , 2004 .

[2]  M. Gurven,et al.  A Bioeconomic Approach to Marriage and the Sexual Division of Labor , 2009, Human nature.

[3]  M. Tovée,et al.  Visual cues to female physical attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Fieder,et al.  The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society , 2007 .

[5]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Dominance rank and mating success in male primates , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  K. Hill,et al.  Hunting Ability and Reproductive Success Among Male Ache Foragers: Preliminary Results , 1985, Current Anthropology.

[7]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Nancy Howell Demography of the Dobe! Kung , 1979 .

[9]  John Q. Patton Meat sharing for coalitional support , 2005 .

[10]  M. Gurven,et al.  Mortality experience of Tsimane Amerindians of Bolivia: Regional variation and temporal trends , 2007, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[11]  M. Gurven,et al.  Hunting, social status and biological fitness , 2006, Social biology.

[12]  Judith Latta Hand,et al.  Resolution of Social Conflicts: Dominance, Egalitarianism, Spheres of Dominance, and Game Theory , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  F. Marlowe Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers , 2004, Human nature.

[14]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Do high-status people really have fewer children? , 2006, Human nature.

[15]  K. Kintigh,et al.  Can Anthropologists Distinguish Good and Poor Hunters? Implications for Hunting Hypotheses, Sharing Conventions, and Cultural Transmission , 2009, Current Anthropology.

[16]  E. Smith Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? , 2004, Human nature.

[17]  M. Gurven,et al.  The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. , 2008, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[18]  L Cosmides,et al.  On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[19]  Herawati Sudoyo,et al.  Male dominance rarely skews the frequency distribution of Y chromosome haplotypes in human populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  Sheryl B. Ball,et al.  The economic value of status , 1998 .

[22]  A. Mark BETTER TO GIVE THAN TO RECEIVE , 2007, Science.

[23]  M. Gurven,et al.  Why Do Men Hunt? , 2009, Current Anthropology.

[24]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  George C. Williams,et al.  Sex and evolution. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[26]  Suling Zhu,et al.  The genetic legacy of the Mongols. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  Thomas V Pollet,et al.  Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[28]  D. E. Stuart,et al.  Food Sharing Among Ache Foragers: Tests of Explanatory Hypotheses [and Comments and Reply] , 1985, Current Anthropology.

[29]  E. Smith,et al.  The benefits of costly signaling: Meriam turtle hunters , 2003 .

[30]  L. Betzig Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History , 1986 .

[31]  Paul L. Hooper,et al.  Domestication Alone Does Not Lead to Inequality , 2010, Current Anthropology.

[32]  M. Mulder On Cultural and Reproductive Success: Kipsigis Evidence , 1987 .

[33]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  The Effect of Social Status on the Honesty of Others , 1971 .

[34]  Napoleon A. Chagnon,et al.  Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective , 1979 .

[35]  J. Henrich,et al.  The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[36]  B. Scelza Fathers' Presence Speeds the Social and Reproductive Careers of Sons , 2010, Current Anthropology.

[37]  James F. O'Connell,et al.  Hunting and Nuclear Families: Some Lessons from the Hadza about Men's Work , 2001 .

[38]  J. Jokela,et al.  Marrying women 15 years younger maximized men's evolutionary fitness in historical Sami , 2008, Biology Letters.

[39]  F. Marlowe The patriarch hypothesis , 2000, Human nature.

[40]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Waist-to-hip ratio versus body mass index as predictors of fitness in women , 2005, Human nature.

[41]  F. D. Waal Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes , 1982 .

[42]  Napoleon A. Chagnon,et al.  Yanomamo: The Fierce People , 1968 .

[43]  N. Chagnon,et al.  Life Histories, Blood Revenge, and Warfare in a Tribal Population , 1988, Science.

[44]  R. Hopcroft Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States , 2006 .

[45]  M. F. Small,et al.  Human reproductive behavior: A darwinian perspective , 1991 .

[46]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[47]  James F. O'Connell,et al.  Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt , 2010, Current Anthropology.

[48]  M. Gurven,et al.  “ It ’ s a Wonderful Life ” : signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay , 2000 .

[49]  A. Dickson On Evolution , 1884, Science.

[50]  Jeffrey K. Snyder,et al.  The dominance dilemma: Do women really prefer dominant mates? , 2008 .

[51]  Frisancho Ar,et al.  Selection on maternal and neonate size at birth , 1993 .

[52]  K. Hawkes,et al.  Hunting and Nuclear Families , 2001, Current Anthropology.