Empowerment in project teams: a multilevel examination of the job performance implications

An integrative multilevel model of empowerment and job performance behaviours is advanced, building on social cognitive theory (SCT). Empowerment climate is hypothesized as influencing individual and team performance behaviours directly and partially through individual and team (psychological) empowerment. Using survey responses from 380 individuals, nested in 115 project management teams, we tested the direct, indirect and cross‐level relationships delineated in the multilevel model, using a combination of OLS regression models and hierarchical linear modelling (HLM). Empowerment climate positively related not only directly to both task and contextual performance behaviours but partially through both individual and team empowerment. At the team level, empowerment climate also positively related directly to taskwork and teamwork behaviours and partially through team empowerment. The results suggest that empowerment climate and psychological empowerment play complementary roles in engendering individual and team performance behaviours and are therefore not mutually exclusive. The findings are also evident of convergence in management practices across cultures as well as different work contexts and further provide concrete targets of manipulation by organizations and leaders desirous of empowering individuals and teams in the project context.

[1]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent , 2004 .

[2]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[3]  David. Proverbs,et al.  Towards developing competency-based measures for construction project managers: Should contextual behaviours be distinguished from task behaviours? , 2008 .

[4]  S. Rowlinson,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework of empowerment and job performance in project teams , 2007 .

[5]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Linkages of project environment to performance: lessons for team leadership , 2004 .

[6]  Piotr Wilk,et al.  Impact of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Job Strain in Nursing Work Settings: Expanding Kanter’s Model , 2001, The Journal of nursing administration.

[7]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[8]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Job Performance , 2010 .

[9]  Florence T. T. Phua.  Improving Construction Cooperation: New Theoretical Insights Into How and Why , 2005 .

[10]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Participative Decision Making and Employee Performance in Different Cultures: The Moderating Effects of Allocentrism/Idiocentrism and Efficacy , 2002 .

[11]  T. Wall,et al.  Empowerment, Performance, and Operational Uncertainty: A Theoretical Integration , 2002 .

[12]  Zoe S. Dimitriades,et al.  Individual, Job, Organizational and Contextual Correlates of Employment Empowerment: Some Greek Evidence , 2004 .

[13]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects , 2004 .

[14]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Empowering project teams: toward an integrative conceptualization of empowerment , 2007 .

[15]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice , 1998 .

[16]  D. Rousseau.  Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction, and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems theory , 1977 .

[17]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Mark L. Mitchell,et al.  Research Design Explained , 1987 .

[19]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[20]  H. Laschinger,et al.  A theoretical approach to studying work empowerment in nursing: a review of studies testing Kanter's theory of structural power in organizations. , 1996, Nursing administration quarterly.

[21]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Empowerment within the UK construction sector , 2002 .

[22]  J. Breaugh.  Important considerations in using statistical procedures to control for nuisance variables in non-experimental studies , 2008 .

[23]  A. Bakker,et al.  Suppressor Variables in Path Models , 2001 .

[24]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[25]  Marc Siegall,et al.  Contextual factors of psychological empowerment , 2000 .

[26]  Aarti Sood,et al.  Empowerment effects across cultures , 2007 .

[27]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[28]  Michael Livingston,et al.  Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research—It's Just Regression! , 2009 .

[29]  Kathleen C. Gerbasi,et al.  Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale , 1972 .

[30]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. , 1986 .

[32]  T. Wall,et al.  Empowerment and Performance , 2005 .

[33]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[34]  L. H. Peters,et al.  Situational Constraints and Work Outcomes: The Influences Of a Frequently Overlooked Construct , 1980 .

[35]  Richard Whitfield,et al.  Implementation of empowerment in Chinese high power-distance organizations , 2008 .

[36]  N. Allen,et al.  Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: evidence from computer simulations. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[38]  James W. Bishop,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT WITH JOB SATISFACTION, EMPLOYEE COOPERATION, AND INTENTION TO QUIT IN U.S. INVESTED ENTERPRISE IN CHINA , 2003 .

[39]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[40]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2003/29 PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: REVIEWING THE EMPOWERMENT EFFECTS ON CRITICAL WORK OUTCOMES , 2003 .

[41]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[42]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[43]  Graham Winch,et al.  Re-engineering construction: the role of research and implementation , 2003 .

[44]  S. Parker,et al.  Work Design and Individual Work Performance: Research Findings and an Agenda for Future Inquiry , 2005 .

[45]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  A Cautionary Tale of Two Statistics: Partial Correlation and Standardized Partial Regression , 2003, The Journal of psychology.

[46]  G. Spreitzer.  An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[47]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  An Overview of Behavioral Issues in Project Management , 2007 .

[48]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Redefining performance measures for construction project managers: an empirical evaluation , 2003 .

[49]  L. J. Williams,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors , 1991 .

[50]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[51]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[52]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[53]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[54]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[55]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[56]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[57]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[58]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 12. , 2003 .

[60]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[61]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[62]  B. Thompson,et al.  Use of Structure Coefficients in Published Multiple Regression Articles: β is not Enough , 2001 .

[63]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS : (and sex, drugs and rock'n' roll) , 2005 .

[64]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[65]  Kenneth H. Blanchard,et al.  The 3 Keys to Empowerment: Release the Power Within People for Astonishing Results , 1999 .

[66]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[67]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[68]  James R. Van Scotter,et al.  Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. , 1996 .

[69]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  G. H. Litwin,et al.  Motivation and Organizational Climate , 1968 .

[71]  Samuel Aryee,et al.  Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes , 2006 .

[72]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[73]  Therese. Joiner,et al.  Decision making delegation: implications for Chinese managers' performance and satisfaction , 2007 .

[74]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[75]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  George B. Graen,et al.  Individual Self-Management: Analysis of Professionals' Self-Managing Activities in Functional and Cross-Functional Work Teams , 1998 .

[77]  Sanjay T. Menon,et al.  Employee Empowerment: An Integrative Psychological Approach , 2001 .

[78]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Empowerment Cognitions and Empowerment Acts , 2000 .

[79]  Peter K. Mills,et al.  Reassessing the Limits of Structural Empowerment: Organizational Constitution and Trust as Controls , 2003 .

[80]  M. Frese,et al.  Performance Concepts and Performance Theory , 2005 .

[81]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[82]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[83]  William N. Cooke.  Employee Participation Programs, Group-Based Incentives, and Company Performance: A Union-Nonunion Comparison , 1994 .

[84]  Colleen J. Heffernan.  Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory ,Bandura AlbertEnglewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1986, xiii +617 pp. Hardback. US$39.50. , 1988 .

[85]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Psychological management of individual performance. , 2005 .

[86]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[87]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Project affinity: the role of emotional attachment in construction projects , 2005 .

[88]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[89]  Aaron M. Anvuur.  Cooperation in construction projects: concept, antecedents and strategies , 2008 .

[90]  Eric Trist,et al.  Organizational Choice. Capabilities of Groups at the Coal Face under Changing Technologies. The Loss, Re-Discovery and Transformation of a Work Tradition , 1964 .

[91]  A. Dainty,et al.  Human Resource Management in Construction Projects: Strategic and Operational Approaches , 2003 .

[92]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Toward a Systems Theory of Motivated Behavior in Work Teams , 2006 .

[93]  Anita M. M. Liu,et al.  A power‐based leadership approach to project management , 2006 .

[94]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[95]  Russ Forrester,et al.  Empowerment: Rejuvenating a potent idea , 2000 .

[96]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[97]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  Management’s Perception of Key Behavioral Indicators for Construction , 2005 .

[98]  Stephen W. Nason,et al.  A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness Satisfaction, and Strain , 1997 .

[99]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Psychological Management of Individual Performance: Sonnentag/Psychological Management , 2005 .

[100]  W. Borman,et al.  Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing , 2000 .

[101]  Richard Fellows,et al.  Enhancing commitment through work empowerment , 2007 .

[102]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement , 1999 .

[103]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[104]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[105]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[106]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[107]  M. Hulme.  Climate and culture , 2006 .