Differential motion processing between species facing Ternus–Pikler display: Non-retinotopic humans versus retinotopic pigeons

Retinotopic encoding is preserved in primate visual cortex. However, several physiological and psychophysical studies have revealed that visual processes can be disengaged from retinotopic coordinates. We examined whether this non-retinotopic processing is common to humans and pigeons, two visually dominant vertebrate species with similar retinotopic organizations in their brains. We used a variant of Ternus-Pikler stimulus as a litmus test for non-retinotopic processing. Six humans and four pigeons were required to discriminate the rotational direction of a target disk placed among linearly arranged non-rotating disks. When all disks flickered in synchrony (a blank screen was inserted between the stimulus presentations) and moved in tandem back and forth, target localization was hampered in humans but not pigeons (Experiment 1). The duration of the blank screen (Experiment 2) and the connection between the disks (Experiment 3) did not affect the pigeons' performance. These results suggest that non-retinotopic processing in human vision is not a feature of pigeon vision, which is instead strictly retinotopic in case of motion. This may reflect the different mechanisms for stimulus selection in both species, in which local motion signals were pooled at later stages of visual processing in humans, but the signals were selected at early stages in pigeons.

[1]  F. Bremmer,et al.  Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons , 1997, Nature.

[2]  J. Hendricks,et al.  Flicker thresholds as determined by a modified conditioned suppression procedure. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  Robert G. Cook,et al.  Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination , 1996 .

[4]  Juan Carlos Letelier,et al.  Attentional Capture? Synchronized Feedback Signals from the Isthmi Boost Retinal Signals to Higher Visual Areas , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. W. Nye The monocular eye movements of the pigeon. , 1969, Vision research.

[6]  A. Blaisdell,et al.  Temporal properties of visual search in pigeon target localization. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[8]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Visual Crowding at a Distance during Predictive Remapping , 2013, Current Biology.

[9]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[10]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Eye movements and the perception of a clear and stable visual world. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  A. Dale,et al.  From retinotopy to recognition: fMRI in human visual cortex , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  K. Fujita,et al.  Do pigeons (Columba livia) perceive object unity? , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[13]  K. Fujita,et al.  Perceptual organization of motions in pigeons (Columba livia)1 , 2004 .

[14]  R. Cook Acquisition and transfer of visual texture discriminations by pigeons. , 1992 .

[15]  B M Dow,et al.  The mapping of visual space onto foveal striate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Cook Dimensional organization and texture discrimination in pigeons , 1992 .

[17]  K. Fujita,et al.  Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  S. Martinez-Conde,et al.  Fixational eye movements across vertebrates: comparative dynamics, physiology, and perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Retinal afferents to the tectum opticum and the nucleus opticus principalis thalami in the pigeon , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  B. Frost The Optokinetic Basis of Head-bobbing in the Pigeon , 1978 .

[21]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Yasuo Nagasaka,et al.  Perceptual Grouping in Pigeons , 2005, Perception.

[23]  D. L. Adams,et al.  A Precise Retinotopic Map of Primate Striate Cortex Generated from the Representation of Angioscotomas , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Blough,et al.  Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion , 1991 .

[25]  S. McFadden,et al.  A further look at the binocular visual field of the pigeon (Columba livia) , 1985, Vision Research.

[26]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the retina on the optic tectum of the pigeon. , 1954, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[27]  H. Karten,et al.  The Origins of Neocortex: Connections and Lamination as Distinct Events in Evolution , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Wasserman,et al.  The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  H. Karten,et al.  Spatial organization of the pigeon tectorotundal pathway: An interdigitating topographic arrangement , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010 , 2011, Vision Research.

[31]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  "Non-retinotopic processing" in Ternus motion displays modeled by spatiotemporal filters. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[32]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[33]  W. Cowan,et al.  The retinal representation upon the optic tectum and isthmo-optic nucleus in the pigeon. , 1966, Journal of anatomy.

[34]  M. Spetch,et al.  Perception of coherent motion in random dot displays by pigeons and humans , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  E. Switkes,et al.  Deoxyglucose analysis of retinotopic organization in primate striate cortex. , 1982, Science.