The late parietal event-related potential component is hierarchically sensitive to chunk tightness during chunk decomposition

[1]  Bahador Makkiabadi,et al.  Computer-aided classifying and characterizing of methamphetamine use disorder using resting-state EEG , 2019, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[2]  T. Demiralp,et al.  Measurement of cognitive dynamics during video watching through event-related potentials (ERPs) and oscillations (EROs) , 2019, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[3]  Hong Li,et al.  Identification and transformation difficulty in problem solving: Electrophysiological evidence from chunk decomposition , 2019, Biological Psychology.

[4]  Pei Sun,et al.  Neural correlates of novelty and appropriateness processing in externally induced constraint relaxation , 2018, NeuroImage.

[5]  Yasar Dasdemir,et al.  Analysis of functional brain connections for positive–negative emotions using phase locking value , 2017, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[6]  Jing Luo,et al.  Probing the Cognitive Mechanism of Mental Representational Change During Chunk Decomposition: A Parametric fMRI Study. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions , 2016, Thinking & reasoning.

[8]  Yi Lei,et al.  The influence of element type and crossed relation on the difficulty of chunk decomposition , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Jin Fan,et al.  The neural basis of novelty and appropriateness in processing of creative chunk decomposition , 2015, NeuroImage.

[10]  John Kounios,et al.  The Aha! Moment , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  Jing Luo,et al.  The role of chunk tightness and chunk familiarity in problem solving: Evidence from ERPs and fMRI , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Michael Öllinger,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms of insight: the role of heuristics and representational change in solving the eight-coin problem. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Jarrod Moss,et al.  Is Insight Always the Same? A Protocol Analysis of Insight in Compound Remote Associate Problems , 2012, J. Probl. Solving.

[14]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  The Effects of Number and Level of Restructuring in Insight Problem Solving , 2009, J. Probl. Solving.

[15]  Jing Luo,et al.  How perceptual processes help to generate new meaning: An EEG study of chunk decomposition in Chinese characters , 2009, Brain Research.

[16]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Neural generators of ERPs linked with Necker cube reversals. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Kazuhisa Niki,et al.  Perceptual contributions to problem solving: Chunk decomposition of Chinese characters , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[18]  P. Fox,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: A meta‐analysis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Parietal Lobe Contribution to Mental Rotation Demonstrated with rTMS , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Yiping Chen,et al.  Effects of Word Form on Brain Processing of Written Chinese , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  An eye movement study of insight problem solving , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[22]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  P. Fox,et al.  The Neural System Underlying Chinese Logograph Reading , 2001, NeuroImage.

[24]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[25]  A. Graybiel.  The Basal Ganglia and Chunking of Action Repertoires , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[26]  R Kakigi,et al.  [Event-related brain potentials]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[27]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[28]  J. Metcalfe.  Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. , 1986 .

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[30]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[31]  Pamala R. Peay.  Eye movement study , 1976 .

[32]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  Wied Ruijssenaars,et al.  Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning , 2012 .

[34]  Trina C. Kershaw,et al.  Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  I. M. Harris,et al.  Selective right parietal lobe activation during mental rotation: a parametric PET study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. , 1995 .

[37]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[38]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[39]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[40]  A. Luchins.  Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .