The impact of emerging institutional norms on adoption timing decisions: evidence from C-TPAT—A government antiterrorism initiative

Drawing upon an institutional theoretic perspective, this study explores the performance outcomes associated with adoption timing and level of investment in a government antiterrorism initiative—the Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C‐TPAT). Using a large‐scale sample of C‐TPAT certified importers, this study found that performance outcomes for high levels of investment in adoption processes differ depending upon the strength of institutional forces. Specifically, early adopters of C‐TPAT processes in a weak institutional context that reported high levels of investment performed no better than firms who invested nominally in the processes, while late adopters in a strong institutional context that reported high investment levels outperformed those that invested nominally. This finding can be explained by viewing C‐TPAT as an ‘emerging’ institution, where forces are coalescing. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Briance Mascarenhas.  Research notes and communications first‐mover effects in multiple dynamic markets , 1992 .

[2]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Patrick L. Anderson.  The Value of Private Businesses in the United States , 2009 .

[4]  Charles E. Bamford,et al.  Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations , 1998 .

[5]  Saul Estrin,et al.  Institutions, resources and entry strategies in emerging economies , 2009 .

[6]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[7]  Neng Liang,et al.  Importer Behavior: the neglected Counterpart of International Exchange , 1997 .

[8]  James C. Anderson,et al.  The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis , 1984 .

[9]  P. Matthyssens,et al.  Global Purchasing Strategy: Conceptualization and Measurement , 2006 .

[10]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  ISO 9000 practices and financial performance: A technology coherence perspective , 2008 .

[11]  Steve Werner.  Recent Developments in International Management Research: A Review of 20 Top Management Journals , 2002 .

[12]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[13]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF THE LIABILITY OF FOREIGNNESS: A GLOBAL STUDY OF SURVIVAL IN FINANCIAL SERVICES , 1997 .

[14]  Klaus E. Meyer,et al.  Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe , 2001, Multinational Enterprises and Emerging Economies.

[15]  Andrew King,et al.  Follow the small? Information-revealing adoption bandwagons when observers expect larger firms to benefit more from adoption , 2007 .

[16]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[17]  D. Flora,et al.  An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[18]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[19]  Yi Jiang,et al.  An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies , 2008 .

[20]  B. Muthén,et al.  A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables , 1985 .

[21]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  International Joint Ventures and the Value of Growth Options , 2008 .

[22]  Paul Matthyssens,et al.  Purchasing internationalisation on both sides of the Atlantic , 2005 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[24]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[25]  Nicole Darnall,et al.  Predicting the Cost of Environmental Management System Adoption: The Role of Capabilities, Resources and Ownership Structure , 2006 .

[26]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[27]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix , 1994 .

[28]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[29]  R. Calantone,et al.  Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance , 2003 .

[30]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method , 1999 .

[31]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Antecedents of Organizational Slack , 1988 .

[32]  Raimund Hasse,et al.  Systems Theory, Societal Contexts, and Organizational Heterogeneity , 2008 .

[33]  Srilata Zaheer.  Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness , 1995 .

[34]  Richard Makadok.  Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? , 1998 .

[35]  S. Shortell,et al.  Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system , 2001 .

[36]  M. Knudsen,et al.  Analyzing internationalization configurations of SME's: The purchaser's perspective , 2007 .