Structural Decomposition Analysis of Raw Material Consumption

The aim of this article is to quantify the drivers for the changes in raw material consumption (domestic material consumption expressed in the form of all materials extracted and used in the production phase) in terms of technology, which refers to the concept of sustainable production; the product structure of final demand, which refers to the concept of sustainable consumption; and the volume of final demand, which is related to economic growth. We also aim to determine to what extent the technological development and a shift in product structure of the final demand compensate for the growth in final consumption volume. Therefore, we apply structural decomposition analysis (SDA) to the change in raw material consumption (RMC) of the Czech Republic between 2000 and 2007. To present the study in a broader context, we also show other material flow indicators for the Czech Republic for 2000 and 2007. Our findings of SDA show that final demand structure has a very limited effect on the change in material flows. The rapid change in final demand volume was not compensated for crude oil, metal ores, construction materials, food crops, and timber. For the material category of non‐iron metal ores, even the change in technology contributes to an increase in material flows. The largest relative increases are reported for non‐iron metal ores (38%) and construction materials (30%). The main changes in material flows related to the Czech Republic are driven by exports and enabled by imports, the main source of these increased material flows. This emphasizes the increasing role of international trade.

[1]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[2]  Jordi Roca,et al.  Energy and CO2 emissions in Spain : Methodology of analysis and some results for 1980-1990 , 1995 .

[3]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A Material History of Australia , 2009 .

[4]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Structural decomposition of energy use in Brazil from 1970 to 1996 , 2009 .

[5]  M. Common,et al.  Accounting for changes in Australian carbon dioxide emissions , 1992 .

[6]  Rutger Hoekstra,et al.  Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy , 2002 .

[7]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  The Raw Material Equivalents of International Trade , 2009 .

[8]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Consumption in the European Union:High‐Resolution Input‐Output Tables with Detailed Environmental Extensions , 2006 .

[9]  Adam Rose,et al.  Sources of change in energy use in the U.S. economy, 1972–1982: A structural decomposition analysis , 1991 .

[10]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  Technological and Demand Change in Energy Use: An Input—Output Analysis , 1987 .

[11]  R. Hoekstra.  Economic Growth, Material Flows and the Environment , 2005 .

[12]  G. Peters.  From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories , 2008 .

[13]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Material implication of Chile's economic growth: Combining material flow accounting (MFA) and structural decomposition analysis (SDA) , 2008 .

[14]  J. Sun.  Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model , 1998 .

[15]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments , 2004 .

[16]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[17]  W. Leontief.  Interrelation of Prices, Output, Savings, and Investment , 1937 .

[18]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[19]  Seung-Jun Kwak,et al.  Industrial CO2 emissions from energy use in Korea: A structural decomposition analysis , 2009 .

[20]  Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek,et al.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? : MIPS-das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften , 1994 .

[21]  Jan Kovanda,et al.  Assessing Socioeconomic Metabolism Through Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment , 2009 .

[22]  J. Robertson.  Factor four: Doubling wealth, halving resource use , 1997 .

[23]  J. oliver-solà.  Prosperity without Growth? – The transition to a sustainable economy , 2010 .

[24]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[25]  C. Weber.  Measuring structural change and energy use: Decomposition of the US economy from 1997 to 2002 , 2009 .

[26]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural decomposition techniques : sense and sensitivity , 1998 .

[27]  Kirsten Schliephake,et al.  Making resources work more efficiently – the importance of supply chain partnerships , 2009 .

[28]  Xiannuan Lin,et al.  Input–Output Anatomy of China's Energy Use Changes in the 1980s , 1995 .

[29]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  W. Leontief.  Structural Matrices of National Economies , 1949 .

[31]  Surendra N. Kulshreshtha,et al.  An interindustry analysis of structural change and energy use linkages in the Saskatchewan economy , 1986 .

[32]  Tomáš Hák,et al.  Material Flow Indicators in the Czech Republic in Light of the Accession to the European Union , 2010 .

[33]  F. Schmidt‐bleek.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch , 1994 .

[34]  E. Hertwich.  Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: a critical review. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.