Multi-step planning calculations with the GOTHIC code used for the design of complex experiments in the PANDA facility

Abstract The evaluation of the hydrogen risk and mitigation measures is increasingly based on the three-dimensional analyses of the distribution of gases and steam in the containment. Currently, simulations are thus carried out with advanced computational tools, including CFD codes, which require extensive validation using detailed measurements in large-scale facilities. However, since these facilities were designed for specific geometries and accident conditions, global scaling criteria are of limited use for designing new experiments addressing 3-D phenomena in different geometries and for different scenarios. Therefore, planning calculations are required to ensure that the tests are representative of expected plant conditions during hypothetical accidental transients. In this paper, a multi-step methodology (from plant to rig) for designing two types of tests in the PANDA facility within the OECD/NEA HYMERES project is illustrated. The first type of experiments addressed the interaction of flows and temperature fields produced by two PARs (Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners) at different elevations in some region of a generic containment in presence of wall condensation. The second type of experiments addressed natural circulation and gas distribution in a generic two-room geometry. The main results of the two series of experiments that were designed using the outcome of this work have been reported in two papers.

[1]  Y. Hassan,et al.  Large eddy simulations of erosion of a stratified layer by a buoyant jet , 2017 .

[2]  Stephan Kelm,et al.  A comparative assessment of different experiments on buoyancy driven mixing processes by means of CFD , 2016 .

[3]  Domenico Paladino,et al.  Toward a CFD-grade database addressing LWR containment phenomena , 2012 .

[4]  Sanjeev Gupta,et al.  Simulation benchmark based on THAI-experiment on dissolution of a steam stratification by natural convection , 2016 .

[5]  P. Royl,et al.  Multi-dimensional simulation of hydrogen distribution and turbulent combustion in severe accidents , 2001 .

[6]  Davide Papini,et al.  Hydrogen distribution and Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner (PAR) mitigation in a PWR-KWU containment type , 2017 .

[7]  Gonzalo Jimenez,et al.  Proposed methodology for Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner sizing and location for a BWR Mark-III reactor containment building , 2016 .

[8]  Y. Sibamoto,et al.  Stratification breakup by a diffuse buoyant jet: The MISTRA HM1-1 and 1-1bis experiments and their CFD analysis , 2018 .

[9]  Kweon-Ha Park,et al.  Hydrogen concentration variation and examination of PAR installation in reactor containment building during hydrogen release from different direction failure places , 2014 .

[10]  Stephan Kelm,et al.  Outcomes from the EURATOM–ROSATOM ERCOSAM SAMARA projects on containment thermal-hydraulics for severe accident management , 2016 .

[11]  P. Royl,et al.  Benchmark on Hydrogen Distribution in a Containment Based on the OECD-NEA THAI HM-2 Experiment , 2011 .

[12]  P. Royl,et al.  Analysis of steam and hydrogen distributions with PAR mitigation in NPP containments , 2000 .

[13]  Jürgen Eyink,et al.  Computational validation of the EPR™ combustible gas control system , 2012 .

[14]  Christopher Boyd Perspectives on CFD analysis in nuclear reactor regulation , 2016 .

[15]  Gonzalo Jimenez,et al.  Analysis of a gas stratification break-up by a vertical jet using the GOTHIC code , 2016 .

[16]  Davide Papini,et al.  Evaluation of the PAR Mitigation System in Swiss PWR Containment Using the GOTHIC Code , 2017 .

[17]  César Queral,et al.  Analysis of the equipment and instrumentation qualification criteria using 3D containment models , 2017 .