Reducing communication requirements for electric vehicle charging using vehicle-originating-signals

We propose a method for reducing the communication requirements for electric vehicle (EV) charging control based on Vehicle-Originating-Signals (VOS). The original VOS approach requires a message exchange between every EV and the aggregator for every time step. This can cause the load on communication systems to increase, especially as the number of EVs increases and the control intervals become more granular. We explore (i) the reduction of EV-originating messages, (ii) the reduction of aggregator-originating messages, and (iii) the challenges in combining both reduction methods. EVs reduce the number of messages by including possible future values in a single message. The aggregator reduces the number of messages by sending single broadcast signals. Combining both methods requires a retransmission protocol. For the evaluation, we compare the original and the improved VOS approaches on a load leveling scenario based on electricity demand, solar generation, and car mobility data from Munich, Germany. The results show that it is possible to reduce the overall message requirements with a minor effect on performance. With savings of over 70% in number of messages, these improvements contribute towards more network-friendly solutions for smart EV charging.

[1]  Ufuk Topcu,et al.  Optimal decentralized protocol for electric vehicle charging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  J. Driesen,et al.  The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Ling Guan,et al.  Optimal Scheduling for Charging and Discharging of Electric Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Siobhán Clarke,et al.  Set point control for charging of electric vehicles on the distribution network , 2014, ISGT 2014.

[5]  J. Storer An Introduction to Data Structures and Algorithms , 2002, Birkhäuser Boston.

[6]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for decentralized electric vehicle charging control , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  Ahmed Yousuf Saber,et al.  Intelligent unit commitment with vehicle-to-grid —A cost-emission optimization , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  Effects of large scale EV and PV integration on power supply systems in the context of Singapore , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[9]  Christoph Goebel,et al.  Using ICT-Controlled Plug-in Electric Vehicles to Supply Grid Regulation in California at Different Renewable Integration Levels , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Hans-Arno Jacobsen,et al.  Benchmarking a car-originated-signal approach for real-time electric vehicle charging control , 2014, ISGT 2014.

[11]  Damian Flynn,et al.  Local Versus Centralized Charging Strategies for Electric Vehicles in Low Voltage Distribution Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Stephan Koch,et al.  Provision of Load Frequency Control by PHEVs, Controllable Loads, and a Cogeneration Unit , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.